胸腰椎手术强化手术恢复方案对阿片类药物使用、住院时间和再入院的影响:51,236例的评估

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Christopher R Good, Shay Bess, Lindsay D Orosz, Stephen S Scibelli, Breton Line, Gina Remington, Cecile Roman, Daniel Luckett, Ehsan Jazini
{"title":"胸腰椎手术强化手术恢复方案对阿片类药物使用、住院时间和再入院的影响:51,236例的评估","authors":"Christopher R Good, Shay Bess, Lindsay D Orosz, Stephen S Scibelli, Breton Line, Gina Remington, Cecile Roman, Daniel Luckett, Ehsan Jazini","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.04.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Evidence-based enhanced surgical recovery (ESR) programs integrate a multidimensional approach to optimize patients during the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases of surgery. Smaller studies suggest several benefits of spine surgery ESR; this study evaluates the effects of ESR for thoracolumbar (TL) fusion surgery on a national scale.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Determine if ESR is associated with a reduction in daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME), length of hospital stay (LOS), and 30-day readmission (READMIT) rates compared to non-ESR controls.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Multicenter, retrospective, case-control study of a prospectively adopted healthcare system ESR program from October 2018 to December 2021.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Consecutive adult patients undergoing TL fusion with known ESR participation status and without a primary diagnosis of tumor, infection, or trauma were included.</p><p><strong>Outcomes measures: </strong>Primary outcomes include daily MME, LOS, and 30-day READMIT rates. Outcomes were analyzed for single-level, multi-level, and all TL fusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from TL fusion procedures performed within a large healthcare system were extracted from hospital-based electronic medical records derived from 1352 surgeons within 138 facilities. Patients were divided as ESR (cases) or non-ESR (controls) based upon enrollment into an ESR program defined by (1) preoperative patient education, (2) multimodal analgesia, (3) intraoperative fluid optimization, (4) opioid-sparing anesthesia, and (5) early postoperative nutrition and ambulation. Outcomes were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 51,236 TL fusion cases (45% male, mean age of 63 years), 24,391 participated in an ESR program and 26,845 did not. For single-level TL fusions, ESR was associated with decreased MME (β= -8.76, p<.001), LOS (β= -8.85, p<.001), and READMIT (OR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.67-0.88) compared to controls. For multi-level TL fusions, ESR was associated with decreased MME (β= -7.32, p<.001) and LOS (β= -12.14, p<.001) compared to controls. For all TL fusions, ESR was associated with decreased MME (β= -7.94, p<.001), LOS (β= -10.54, p<.001), and READMIT (OR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.98) compared to non-ESR controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This national healthcare system analysis of over 50,000 TL spine fusion cases by 1,352 surgeons at 138 centers across the US confirms that ESR adoption is associated with decreased daily MME, LOS, and READMIT compared to non-ESR controls. Surgeons should consider adoption of ESR programs to improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of enhanced surgical recovery program for thoracolumbar spine surgery on opioid use, length of hospital stay, and hospital readmissions: evaluation of 51,236 cases.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher R Good, Shay Bess, Lindsay D Orosz, Stephen S Scibelli, Breton Line, Gina Remington, Cecile Roman, Daniel Luckett, Ehsan Jazini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.04.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Evidence-based enhanced surgical recovery (ESR) programs integrate a multidimensional approach to optimize patients during the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases of surgery. Smaller studies suggest several benefits of spine surgery ESR; this study evaluates the effects of ESR for thoracolumbar (TL) fusion surgery on a national scale.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Determine if ESR is associated with a reduction in daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME), length of hospital stay (LOS), and 30-day readmission (READMIT) rates compared to non-ESR controls.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Multicenter, retrospective, case-control study of a prospectively adopted healthcare system ESR program from October 2018 to December 2021.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Consecutive adult patients undergoing TL fusion with known ESR participation status and without a primary diagnosis of tumor, infection, or trauma were included.</p><p><strong>Outcomes measures: </strong>Primary outcomes include daily MME, LOS, and 30-day READMIT rates. Outcomes were analyzed for single-level, multi-level, and all TL fusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from TL fusion procedures performed within a large healthcare system were extracted from hospital-based electronic medical records derived from 1352 surgeons within 138 facilities. Patients were divided as ESR (cases) or non-ESR (controls) based upon enrollment into an ESR program defined by (1) preoperative patient education, (2) multimodal analgesia, (3) intraoperative fluid optimization, (4) opioid-sparing anesthesia, and (5) early postoperative nutrition and ambulation. Outcomes were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 51,236 TL fusion cases (45% male, mean age of 63 years), 24,391 participated in an ESR program and 26,845 did not. For single-level TL fusions, ESR was associated with decreased MME (β= -8.76, p<.001), LOS (β= -8.85, p<.001), and READMIT (OR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.67-0.88) compared to controls. For multi-level TL fusions, ESR was associated with decreased MME (β= -7.32, p<.001) and LOS (β= -12.14, p<.001) compared to controls. For all TL fusions, ESR was associated with decreased MME (β= -7.94, p<.001), LOS (β= -10.54, p<.001), and READMIT (OR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.98) compared to non-ESR controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This national healthcare system analysis of over 50,000 TL spine fusion cases by 1,352 surgeons at 138 centers across the US confirms that ESR adoption is associated with decreased daily MME, LOS, and READMIT compared to non-ESR controls. Surgeons should consider adoption of ESR programs to improve patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.04.011\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.04.011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景背景:基于证据的增强手术恢复(ESR)项目整合了一种多维方法,以优化手术前、手术中和手术后阶段的患者。较小规模的研究表明脊柱手术ESR有几个好处;本研究在全国范围内评估ESR在胸腰椎(TL)融合手术中的效果。目的:确定与非ESR对照组相比,ESR是否与每日吗啡毫克当量(MME)、住院时间(LOS)和30天再入院率(READMIT)的减少有关。研究设计:对2018年10月至2021年12月前瞻性采用的医疗系统ESR项目进行多中心、回顾性、病例对照研究。患者样本:连续接受TL融合且已知ESR参与状态且未初步诊断为肿瘤、感染或创伤的成年患者被纳入。结局指标:主要结局包括每日MME、LOS和30天再入院率。分析单水平、多水平和所有TL融合的结果。方法:在大型医疗保健系统内进行的TL融合手术的数据提取自来自138家机构的1352名外科医生的医院电子病历。根据纳入ESR计划(1)术前患者教育、(2)多模式镇痛、(3)术中液体优化、(4)不使用阿片类药物麻醉、(5)术后早期营养和下床活动),将患者分为ESR(病例)和非ESR(对照组)。比较两组间的结果。结果:在51,236例TL融合病例中(45%为男性,平均年龄63岁),24,391例参加了ESR计划,26,845例没有。对于单节段TL融合,ESR与MME降低相关(β= -8.76)。结论:美国138个中心1352名外科医生对超过50000例TL脊柱融合病例进行的全国医疗系统分析证实,与非ESR对照组相比,采用ESR与每日MME、LOS和READMIT降低相关。外科医生应考虑采用ESR方案来改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of enhanced surgical recovery program for thoracolumbar spine surgery on opioid use, length of hospital stay, and hospital readmissions: evaluation of 51,236 cases.

Background context: Evidence-based enhanced surgical recovery (ESR) programs integrate a multidimensional approach to optimize patients during the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases of surgery. Smaller studies suggest several benefits of spine surgery ESR; this study evaluates the effects of ESR for thoracolumbar (TL) fusion surgery on a national scale.

Purpose: Determine if ESR is associated with a reduction in daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME), length of hospital stay (LOS), and 30-day readmission (READMIT) rates compared to non-ESR controls.

Study design: Multicenter, retrospective, case-control study of a prospectively adopted healthcare system ESR program from October 2018 to December 2021.

Patient sample: Consecutive adult patients undergoing TL fusion with known ESR participation status and without a primary diagnosis of tumor, infection, or trauma were included.

Outcomes measures: Primary outcomes include daily MME, LOS, and 30-day READMIT rates. Outcomes were analyzed for single-level, multi-level, and all TL fusions.

Methods: Data from TL fusion procedures performed within a large healthcare system were extracted from hospital-based electronic medical records derived from 1352 surgeons within 138 facilities. Patients were divided as ESR (cases) or non-ESR (controls) based upon enrollment into an ESR program defined by (1) preoperative patient education, (2) multimodal analgesia, (3) intraoperative fluid optimization, (4) opioid-sparing anesthesia, and (5) early postoperative nutrition and ambulation. Outcomes were compared between groups.

Results: Of 51,236 TL fusion cases (45% male, mean age of 63 years), 24,391 participated in an ESR program and 26,845 did not. For single-level TL fusions, ESR was associated with decreased MME (β= -8.76, p<.001), LOS (β= -8.85, p<.001), and READMIT (OR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.67-0.88) compared to controls. For multi-level TL fusions, ESR was associated with decreased MME (β= -7.32, p<.001) and LOS (β= -12.14, p<.001) compared to controls. For all TL fusions, ESR was associated with decreased MME (β= -7.94, p<.001), LOS (β= -10.54, p<.001), and READMIT (OR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.98) compared to non-ESR controls.

Conclusions: This national healthcare system analysis of over 50,000 TL spine fusion cases by 1,352 surgeons at 138 centers across the US confirms that ESR adoption is associated with decreased daily MME, LOS, and READMIT compared to non-ESR controls. Surgeons should consider adoption of ESR programs to improve patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信