“知情健康选择”中学干预对肯尼亚中学生批判性思考健康选择能力的影响:一项集群随机试验的1年随访

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-08810-0
Faith Chesire, Margaret Kaseje, Violet Gisore, Michael Mugisha, Ronald Ssenyonga, Matt Oxman, Allen Nsangi, Daniel Semakula, Christopher James Rose, Laetitia Nyirazinyoye, Simon Lewin, Nelson K Sewankambo, Sarah Rosenbaum, Jenny Moberg, Andrew D Oxman
{"title":"“知情健康选择”中学干预对肯尼亚中学生批判性思考健康选择能力的影响:一项集群随机试验的1年随访","authors":"Faith Chesire, Margaret Kaseje, Violet Gisore, Michael Mugisha, Ronald Ssenyonga, Matt Oxman, Allen Nsangi, Daniel Semakula, Christopher James Rose, Laetitia Nyirazinyoye, Simon Lewin, Nelson K Sewankambo, Sarah Rosenbaum, Jenny Moberg, Andrew D Oxman","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-08810-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Informed Health Choices (IHC) secondary school intervention aimed to teach students to assess claims about treatments. This follow-up of a cluster randomized trial assessed the retention of knowledge and the application of the nine prioritized IHC key concepts 1 year after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a random assignment of 80 secondary schools in Western Kenya into either the intervention (n = 40) or control (n = 40) group. Both groups adhered to the standard curriculum. Teachers from the intervention group were invited to participate in a 2-day training workshop and were granted access to \"Be Smart About Your Health\" digital resources, comprising 10 lessons. These lessons, focused on nine prioritized IHC concepts, delivered over a single school term from May to August 2022. The digital resources were accessible online via smartphones or computers and could also be downloaded for offline use. The primary outcome measure, assessed at the end of the school term and again after 1 year, was the percentage of students achieving a passing score (defined as ≥ 9 out of 18 correct answers) on the \"Critical Thinking about Health\" test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the total 3360 students involved in the trial, 2446 (72.8%) completed the test after 1 year. Within the intervention group, 728 out of 1369 students (53.2%) achieved a passing score after 1 year, compared to 61.7% immediately post-intervention. In contrast, in the control group, 347 out of 1077 students (32.2%) had a passing score after 1 year. The adjusted difference in passing rates between the intervention and control groups after 1 year was 20.8% (with a 95% confidence interval of 13.6 to 28.0%), compared to 27.3% (with a 95% confidence interval of 19.6 to 34.9%) immediately after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that students were able to retain knowledge and the ability to apply the IHC key concepts, 1 year after the intervention. But fewer students in the intervention group had a passing score after 1 year compared to just after the intervention. Highlighting follow-up training is likely necessary to reinforce these skills over time.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Pan African Clinical Trial Registry, trial identifier: PACTR202204883917313. Registered on 05/04/2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of the Informed Health Choices secondary school intervention on the ability of lower secondary students in Kenya to think critically about health choices: 1-year follow-up of a cluster-randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Faith Chesire, Margaret Kaseje, Violet Gisore, Michael Mugisha, Ronald Ssenyonga, Matt Oxman, Allen Nsangi, Daniel Semakula, Christopher James Rose, Laetitia Nyirazinyoye, Simon Lewin, Nelson K Sewankambo, Sarah Rosenbaum, Jenny Moberg, Andrew D Oxman\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-025-08810-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Informed Health Choices (IHC) secondary school intervention aimed to teach students to assess claims about treatments. This follow-up of a cluster randomized trial assessed the retention of knowledge and the application of the nine prioritized IHC key concepts 1 year after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a random assignment of 80 secondary schools in Western Kenya into either the intervention (n = 40) or control (n = 40) group. Both groups adhered to the standard curriculum. Teachers from the intervention group were invited to participate in a 2-day training workshop and were granted access to \\\"Be Smart About Your Health\\\" digital resources, comprising 10 lessons. These lessons, focused on nine prioritized IHC concepts, delivered over a single school term from May to August 2022. The digital resources were accessible online via smartphones or computers and could also be downloaded for offline use. The primary outcome measure, assessed at the end of the school term and again after 1 year, was the percentage of students achieving a passing score (defined as ≥ 9 out of 18 correct answers) on the \\\"Critical Thinking about Health\\\" test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the total 3360 students involved in the trial, 2446 (72.8%) completed the test after 1 year. Within the intervention group, 728 out of 1369 students (53.2%) achieved a passing score after 1 year, compared to 61.7% immediately post-intervention. In contrast, in the control group, 347 out of 1077 students (32.2%) had a passing score after 1 year. The adjusted difference in passing rates between the intervention and control groups after 1 year was 20.8% (with a 95% confidence interval of 13.6 to 28.0%), compared to 27.3% (with a 95% confidence interval of 19.6 to 34.9%) immediately after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that students were able to retain knowledge and the ability to apply the IHC key concepts, 1 year after the intervention. But fewer students in the intervention group had a passing score after 1 year compared to just after the intervention. Highlighting follow-up training is likely necessary to reinforce these skills over time.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Pan African Clinical Trial Registry, trial identifier: PACTR202204883917313. Registered on 05/04/2022.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08810-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08810-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:知情健康选择(IHC)中学干预旨在教学生评估有关治疗的要求。这是一项分组随机试验的随访,评估了干预1年后9个优先IHC关键概念的知识保留和应用情况。方法:我们将肯尼亚西部的80所中学随机分为干预组(n = 40)和对照组(n = 40)。两组学生都遵守标准课程。干预组的教师被邀请参加为期两天的培训讲习班,并获得了“明智对待你的健康”数字资源,包括10节课。这些课程侧重于9个重点IHC概念,在2022年5月至8月的一个学期内交付。这些数字资源可以通过智能手机或电脑在线访问,也可以下载供离线使用。在学期结束和一年后再次评估的主要结果测量是在“健康批判性思维”测试中获得及格分数(定义为18个正确答案中≥9个)的学生百分比。结果:在参与试验的3360名学生中,2446名(72.8%)在1年后完成了测试。在干预组中,1369名学生中有728名(53.2%)在一年后达到了及格分数,而干预后立即达到了61.7%。相比之下,在对照组中,1077名学生中有347名(32.2%)在1年后通过了考试。干预组与对照组1年后调整后的通过率差异为20.8%(95%可信区间为13.6 ~ 28.0%),而干预后立即调整后的通过率差异为27.3%(95%可信区间为19.6 ~ 34.9%)。结论:本研究表明,在干预1年后,学生能够保留知识和应用IHC关键概念的能力。但是与刚接受干预的学生相比,干预组一年后通过考试的学生较少。随着时间的推移,强调后续培训可能是必要的,以加强这些技能。试验注册:泛非临床试验注册中心,试验标识:PACTR202204883917313。注册日期:05/04/2022
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of the Informed Health Choices secondary school intervention on the ability of lower secondary students in Kenya to think critically about health choices: 1-year follow-up of a cluster-randomized trial.

Introduction: The Informed Health Choices (IHC) secondary school intervention aimed to teach students to assess claims about treatments. This follow-up of a cluster randomized trial assessed the retention of knowledge and the application of the nine prioritized IHC key concepts 1 year after the intervention.

Methods: We conducted a random assignment of 80 secondary schools in Western Kenya into either the intervention (n = 40) or control (n = 40) group. Both groups adhered to the standard curriculum. Teachers from the intervention group were invited to participate in a 2-day training workshop and were granted access to "Be Smart About Your Health" digital resources, comprising 10 lessons. These lessons, focused on nine prioritized IHC concepts, delivered over a single school term from May to August 2022. The digital resources were accessible online via smartphones or computers and could also be downloaded for offline use. The primary outcome measure, assessed at the end of the school term and again after 1 year, was the percentage of students achieving a passing score (defined as ≥ 9 out of 18 correct answers) on the "Critical Thinking about Health" test.

Results: Out of the total 3360 students involved in the trial, 2446 (72.8%) completed the test after 1 year. Within the intervention group, 728 out of 1369 students (53.2%) achieved a passing score after 1 year, compared to 61.7% immediately post-intervention. In contrast, in the control group, 347 out of 1077 students (32.2%) had a passing score after 1 year. The adjusted difference in passing rates between the intervention and control groups after 1 year was 20.8% (with a 95% confidence interval of 13.6 to 28.0%), compared to 27.3% (with a 95% confidence interval of 19.6 to 34.9%) immediately after the intervention.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that students were able to retain knowledge and the ability to apply the IHC key concepts, 1 year after the intervention. But fewer students in the intervention group had a passing score after 1 year compared to just after the intervention. Highlighting follow-up training is likely necessary to reinforce these skills over time.

Trial registration: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry, trial identifier: PACTR202204883917313. Registered on 05/04/2022.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信