Ria Garg, Tianru Wang, Mina Tadrous, Tony Antoniou, Tara Gomes
{"title":"加拿大安大略省公共分配呼吸吸入器的成本和使用趋势:一项重复的横断面研究。","authors":"Ria Garg, Tianru Wang, Mina Tadrous, Tony Antoniou, Tara Gomes","doi":"10.1002/pds.70125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Several new respiratory inhalers have recently entered the market, including combination therapy products and generic alternatives. Therefore, we examined the cost and utilization of publicly dispensed respiratory inhalers in Ontario, Canada, and the impact of new market entrants on these trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study among provincial drug program beneficiaries dispensed a respiratory inhaler between January 1, 2003, and March 31, 2023. We estimated per-beneficiary spending on respiratory inhalers per quarter, defined as the cost (2022 Canadian dollars) of respiratory inhalers reimbursement divided by the number of beneficiaries dispensed a respiratory inhaler. Joinpoint regression models were used to characterize changes in the trend.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between Q1 of 2003 and Q1 of 2023, public payer spending rose 160% ($26 206 322 to $68 054 816), while the number of beneficiaries dispensed a respiratory inhaler increased 92% (155 893 to 299 418). Reimbursement of ICS/LABA inhalers accounted for half the cost ($33 844 484 in Q1 of 2023). The trend for per-beneficiary spending was marked by six joinpoints, with periods of increasing and decreasing quarterly costs. Between 2003 and 2015, per-beneficiary spending increased, reaching $248/beneficiary in Q1 of 2015. In Q2 of 2015, the trend decreased for the first time and continued to decline until Q2 of 2018 ($206/beneficiary). The trend increased again after Q3 of 2018 and reached a plateau in Q3 of 2019 ($216/beneficiary).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Public formulary listing of combination therapy inhalers, namely LAMA/LABA in Q2 of 2015, coincided with a significant decline in per-beneficiary spending on respiratory inhalers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 4","pages":"e70125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977044/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in the Cost and Utilization of Publicly Dispensed Respiratory Inhalers in Ontario, Canada: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ria Garg, Tianru Wang, Mina Tadrous, Tony Antoniou, Tara Gomes\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pds.70125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Several new respiratory inhalers have recently entered the market, including combination therapy products and generic alternatives. Therefore, we examined the cost and utilization of publicly dispensed respiratory inhalers in Ontario, Canada, and the impact of new market entrants on these trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study among provincial drug program beneficiaries dispensed a respiratory inhaler between January 1, 2003, and March 31, 2023. We estimated per-beneficiary spending on respiratory inhalers per quarter, defined as the cost (2022 Canadian dollars) of respiratory inhalers reimbursement divided by the number of beneficiaries dispensed a respiratory inhaler. Joinpoint regression models were used to characterize changes in the trend.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between Q1 of 2003 and Q1 of 2023, public payer spending rose 160% ($26 206 322 to $68 054 816), while the number of beneficiaries dispensed a respiratory inhaler increased 92% (155 893 to 299 418). Reimbursement of ICS/LABA inhalers accounted for half the cost ($33 844 484 in Q1 of 2023). The trend for per-beneficiary spending was marked by six joinpoints, with periods of increasing and decreasing quarterly costs. Between 2003 and 2015, per-beneficiary spending increased, reaching $248/beneficiary in Q1 of 2015. In Q2 of 2015, the trend decreased for the first time and continued to decline until Q2 of 2018 ($206/beneficiary). The trend increased again after Q3 of 2018 and reached a plateau in Q3 of 2019 ($216/beneficiary).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Public formulary listing of combination therapy inhalers, namely LAMA/LABA in Q2 of 2015, coincided with a significant decline in per-beneficiary spending on respiratory inhalers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"e70125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977044/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70125\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trends in the Cost and Utilization of Publicly Dispensed Respiratory Inhalers in Ontario, Canada: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.
Purpose: Several new respiratory inhalers have recently entered the market, including combination therapy products and generic alternatives. Therefore, we examined the cost and utilization of publicly dispensed respiratory inhalers in Ontario, Canada, and the impact of new market entrants on these trends.
Methods: We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study among provincial drug program beneficiaries dispensed a respiratory inhaler between January 1, 2003, and March 31, 2023. We estimated per-beneficiary spending on respiratory inhalers per quarter, defined as the cost (2022 Canadian dollars) of respiratory inhalers reimbursement divided by the number of beneficiaries dispensed a respiratory inhaler. Joinpoint regression models were used to characterize changes in the trend.
Results: Between Q1 of 2003 and Q1 of 2023, public payer spending rose 160% ($26 206 322 to $68 054 816), while the number of beneficiaries dispensed a respiratory inhaler increased 92% (155 893 to 299 418). Reimbursement of ICS/LABA inhalers accounted for half the cost ($33 844 484 in Q1 of 2023). The trend for per-beneficiary spending was marked by six joinpoints, with periods of increasing and decreasing quarterly costs. Between 2003 and 2015, per-beneficiary spending increased, reaching $248/beneficiary in Q1 of 2015. In Q2 of 2015, the trend decreased for the first time and continued to decline until Q2 of 2018 ($206/beneficiary). The trend increased again after Q3 of 2018 and reached a plateau in Q3 of 2019 ($216/beneficiary).
Conclusions: Public formulary listing of combination therapy inhalers, namely LAMA/LABA in Q2 of 2015, coincided with a significant decline in per-beneficiary spending on respiratory inhalers.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report.
Particular areas of interest include:
design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology;
comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world;
methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology;
assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy;
patterns of drug utilization;
relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines;
evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.