基于sodc的PCR检测青少年咽拭子携带脑膜炎奈瑟菌缺乏特异性。

IF 3.7 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Dan Duy Pham-Tran, Lex E X Leong, Mark McMillan, Andrew Lawrence, Hassen Mohammed, Adam Finn, Helen S Marshall
{"title":"基于sodc的PCR检测青少年咽拭子携带脑膜炎奈瑟菌缺乏特异性。","authors":"Dan Duy Pham-Tran, Lex E X Leong, Mark McMillan, Andrew Lawrence, Hassen Mohammed, Adam Finn, Helen S Marshall","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.02779-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The utility of the superoxide dismutase C (<i>sodC</i>) gene for detecting <i>Neisseria meningitidis</i> carriage in pharyngeal swab samples is unclear. While it has been explored as an alternative to the capsule transport A gene for detecting invasive strains, its potential as the sole target for real-time PCR in meningococcal carriage screening remains unexplored. This study aimed to assess the utility of using <i>sodC</i> as a target for detecting invasive and non-invasive strains of <i>Neisseria meningitidis</i> in pharyngeal swabs. Oropharyngeal swab samples collected from adolescents (approximately 15-18 years of age) enrolled in the \"B-Part-of-It\" cluster-randomized controlled trial (NCT03089086) were selected for this study. Samples were initially screened for the presence of specific <i>N meningitidis</i> porin A gene (<i>porA</i>) using PCR and then preserved by freezing at -80°C. An assay targeting the <i>sodC</i> gene was developed using the locked nucleic acid probe-based method. Upon optimization of the <i>sodC</i> assay, 1,092 samples were retested using this assay and compared against the results from the <i>porA</i> assays to determine concordance. Out of 1,092 samples tested, 965 (88.4%) were <i>sodC</i> positive, with 100% sensitivity and 13% specificity compared to <i>porA</i>. The positive predictive values and negative predictive values for the <i>sod</i>C assay were 12% and 100%, respectively. When compared to <i>porA</i> PCR as the gold standard, the <i>sodC</i> assay lacks sufficient specificity to serve as a stand-alone screening assay for the detection of <i>Neisseria meningitidis</i> carriage in pharyngeal samples from adolescents.IMPORTANCEWhile the <i>sodC</i> assay successfully detects <i>N. meningitidis</i>, we identified a limitation in its specificity due to potential cross-reactivity with other organisms, including <i>Haemophilus</i> spp., which can result in false positives. This limitation highlights the need for careful interpretation of <i>Neisseria meningitidis</i> carriage results, especially in epidemiological studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0277924"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The lack of specificity of <i>sodC</i>-based PCR for the detection of <i>Neisseria meningitidis</i> carriage in pharyngeal swabs from adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Dan Duy Pham-Tran, Lex E X Leong, Mark McMillan, Andrew Lawrence, Hassen Mohammed, Adam Finn, Helen S Marshall\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/spectrum.02779-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The utility of the superoxide dismutase C (<i>sodC</i>) gene for detecting <i>Neisseria meningitidis</i> carriage in pharyngeal swab samples is unclear. While it has been explored as an alternative to the capsule transport A gene for detecting invasive strains, its potential as the sole target for real-time PCR in meningococcal carriage screening remains unexplored. This study aimed to assess the utility of using <i>sodC</i> as a target for detecting invasive and non-invasive strains of <i>Neisseria meningitidis</i> in pharyngeal swabs. Oropharyngeal swab samples collected from adolescents (approximately 15-18 years of age) enrolled in the \\\"B-Part-of-It\\\" cluster-randomized controlled trial (NCT03089086) were selected for this study. Samples were initially screened for the presence of specific <i>N meningitidis</i> porin A gene (<i>porA</i>) using PCR and then preserved by freezing at -80°C. An assay targeting the <i>sodC</i> gene was developed using the locked nucleic acid probe-based method. Upon optimization of the <i>sodC</i> assay, 1,092 samples were retested using this assay and compared against the results from the <i>porA</i> assays to determine concordance. Out of 1,092 samples tested, 965 (88.4%) were <i>sodC</i> positive, with 100% sensitivity and 13% specificity compared to <i>porA</i>. The positive predictive values and negative predictive values for the <i>sod</i>C assay were 12% and 100%, respectively. When compared to <i>porA</i> PCR as the gold standard, the <i>sodC</i> assay lacks sufficient specificity to serve as a stand-alone screening assay for the detection of <i>Neisseria meningitidis</i> carriage in pharyngeal samples from adolescents.IMPORTANCEWhile the <i>sodC</i> assay successfully detects <i>N. meningitidis</i>, we identified a limitation in its specificity due to potential cross-reactivity with other organisms, including <i>Haemophilus</i> spp., which can result in false positives. This limitation highlights the need for careful interpretation of <i>Neisseria meningitidis</i> carriage results, especially in epidemiological studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0277924\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02779-24\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02779-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

超氧化物歧化酶C (sodC)基因用于检测咽拭子样本中脑膜炎奈瑟菌携带的效用尚不清楚。虽然它已经被探索作为一种替代胶囊转运A基因来检测入侵菌株,但它作为实时PCR在脑膜炎球菌载体筛选中的唯一目标的潜力仍未被探索。本研究旨在评估使用sodC作为检测咽拭子中侵袭性和非侵袭性脑膜炎奈瑟菌菌株的靶点的效用。本研究选择参加“B-Part-of-It”集群随机对照试验(NCT03089086)的青少年(约15-18岁)的口咽拭子样本。首先用PCR技术筛选样品中是否存在特异性脑膜炎球菌孔蛋白A基因(porA),然后在-80°C冷冻保存。建立了以锁定核酸探针为基础的sodC基因检测方法。优化sodC检测后,1092个样品使用该方法重新检测,并与porA检测结果进行比较,以确定一致性。在1092份检测样本中,965份(88.4%)为sodC阳性,与porA相比,敏感性为100%,特异性为13%。sodC检测的阳性预测值为12%,阴性预测值为100%。与作为金标准的porA PCR相比,sodC检测缺乏足够的特异性,无法作为检测青少年咽样本中脑膜炎奈瑟菌携带的独立筛选方法。重要性:虽然sodC检测成功检测脑膜炎奈瑟菌,但由于与其他生物(包括嗜血杆菌)的潜在交叉反应性,我们发现其特异性存在局限性,这可能导致假阳性。这一限制突出了对脑膜炎奈瑟菌携带结果进行仔细解释的必要性,特别是在流行病学研究中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The lack of specificity of sodC-based PCR for the detection of Neisseria meningitidis carriage in pharyngeal swabs from adolescents.

The utility of the superoxide dismutase C (sodC) gene for detecting Neisseria meningitidis carriage in pharyngeal swab samples is unclear. While it has been explored as an alternative to the capsule transport A gene for detecting invasive strains, its potential as the sole target for real-time PCR in meningococcal carriage screening remains unexplored. This study aimed to assess the utility of using sodC as a target for detecting invasive and non-invasive strains of Neisseria meningitidis in pharyngeal swabs. Oropharyngeal swab samples collected from adolescents (approximately 15-18 years of age) enrolled in the "B-Part-of-It" cluster-randomized controlled trial (NCT03089086) were selected for this study. Samples were initially screened for the presence of specific N meningitidis porin A gene (porA) using PCR and then preserved by freezing at -80°C. An assay targeting the sodC gene was developed using the locked nucleic acid probe-based method. Upon optimization of the sodC assay, 1,092 samples were retested using this assay and compared against the results from the porA assays to determine concordance. Out of 1,092 samples tested, 965 (88.4%) were sodC positive, with 100% sensitivity and 13% specificity compared to porA. The positive predictive values and negative predictive values for the sodC assay were 12% and 100%, respectively. When compared to porA PCR as the gold standard, the sodC assay lacks sufficient specificity to serve as a stand-alone screening assay for the detection of Neisseria meningitidis carriage in pharyngeal samples from adolescents.IMPORTANCEWhile the sodC assay successfully detects N. meningitidis, we identified a limitation in its specificity due to potential cross-reactivity with other organisms, including Haemophilus spp., which can result in false positives. This limitation highlights the need for careful interpretation of Neisseria meningitidis carriage results, especially in epidemiological studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbiology spectrum
Microbiology spectrum Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
1800
期刊介绍: Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信