药物利用评价和眼科药物调剂后知识的评估:埃塞俄比亚西北部贡达尔大学综合专科医院的一项解释性顺序混合方法研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Abaynesh Fentahun Bekalu, Tekletsadik Tekleslassie Alemayehu, Gebremariam Wulie Geremew, Abebech Tewabe Gelaye, Habtamu Semagn Ayele, Demis Getachew, Alemante Tafese Beyna, Assefa Kebad Mengesha, Esileman Abdela Muche
{"title":"药物利用评价和眼科药物调剂后知识的评估:埃塞俄比亚西北部贡达尔大学综合专科医院的一项解释性顺序混合方法研究。","authors":"Abaynesh Fentahun Bekalu, Tekletsadik Tekleslassie Alemayehu, Gebremariam Wulie Geremew, Abebech Tewabe Gelaye, Habtamu Semagn Ayele, Demis Getachew, Alemante Tafese Beyna, Assefa Kebad Mengesha, Esileman Abdela Muche","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12687-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Irrational prescription of medication is a common issue in clinical practice, particularly for eye disorders that can affect vision. This study aimed to assess the prescribing practices, drug utilization, and post-dispensing knowledge of ophthalmic medications at the University of Gondar Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital in Northwest Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An explanatory sequential mixed-methods study was conducted at the ophthalmology department of the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from March 2024 to June 2024. Quantitative data were collected using an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire, and chart review was then entered into EpiData version 4.6 and analyzed using SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics were computed and Binary logistic regression analyses identified factors influencing post-dispensing knowledge, with a significance level of p < 0.05 and results presented with 95% confidence intervals. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews and analyzed thematically using OpenCode software version 4.2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents were elderly and male, with a higher prevalence of ocular diseases. Ophthalmic medications were predominantly solutions (53.2%), with antibacterial drugs (41.2%), especially Tetracycline, being the most common. Fixed-dose combination drugs were primarily steroid-antibiotic combinations. The average number of drugs per prescription was 1.43, with 90.37% of prescriptions being generic and 66.8% from the National Essential Drug List. Strength, dose, frequency, and duration were recorded in 68.3%, 31.5%, 92.4%, and 31.5% of the prescriptions, respectively. Post-dispensing knowledge was good in 38% of the patients, and 11.5% used medication in both eyes despite infection in only one. Patients with a diploma or higher education (AOR = 2.46, 95% CI 1.35, 4.46) were more likely to have better medication knowledge than those unable to read or write.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most prescribing indicators were below the e World Health Organization's recommended standards, except for the number of drugs per prescription and the dispensing time. In addition, most ophthalmic prescriptions lacked adequate and complete prescribing information, and most patients had insufficient post-dispensing knowledge. These findings highlight the urgent need to improve prescribing practices, enhance counseling, and implement targeted educational programs to ensure safer and more effective ophthalmic care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"506"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of drug utilization evaluation and post-dispensing knowledge of ophthalmic medications: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Abaynesh Fentahun Bekalu, Tekletsadik Tekleslassie Alemayehu, Gebremariam Wulie Geremew, Abebech Tewabe Gelaye, Habtamu Semagn Ayele, Demis Getachew, Alemante Tafese Beyna, Assefa Kebad Mengesha, Esileman Abdela Muche\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-025-12687-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Irrational prescription of medication is a common issue in clinical practice, particularly for eye disorders that can affect vision. This study aimed to assess the prescribing practices, drug utilization, and post-dispensing knowledge of ophthalmic medications at the University of Gondar Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital in Northwest Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An explanatory sequential mixed-methods study was conducted at the ophthalmology department of the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from March 2024 to June 2024. Quantitative data were collected using an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire, and chart review was then entered into EpiData version 4.6 and analyzed using SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics were computed and Binary logistic regression analyses identified factors influencing post-dispensing knowledge, with a significance level of p < 0.05 and results presented with 95% confidence intervals. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews and analyzed thematically using OpenCode software version 4.2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents were elderly and male, with a higher prevalence of ocular diseases. Ophthalmic medications were predominantly solutions (53.2%), with antibacterial drugs (41.2%), especially Tetracycline, being the most common. Fixed-dose combination drugs were primarily steroid-antibiotic combinations. The average number of drugs per prescription was 1.43, with 90.37% of prescriptions being generic and 66.8% from the National Essential Drug List. Strength, dose, frequency, and duration were recorded in 68.3%, 31.5%, 92.4%, and 31.5% of the prescriptions, respectively. Post-dispensing knowledge was good in 38% of the patients, and 11.5% used medication in both eyes despite infection in only one. Patients with a diploma or higher education (AOR = 2.46, 95% CI 1.35, 4.46) were more likely to have better medication knowledge than those unable to read or write.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most prescribing indicators were below the e World Health Organization's recommended standards, except for the number of drugs per prescription and the dispensing time. In addition, most ophthalmic prescriptions lacked adequate and complete prescribing information, and most patients had insufficient post-dispensing knowledge. These findings highlight the urgent need to improve prescribing practices, enhance counseling, and implement targeted educational programs to ensure safer and more effective ophthalmic care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12687-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12687-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不合理的药物处方是临床实践中常见的问题,特别是对影响视力的眼部疾病。本研究旨在评估埃塞俄比亚西北部贡达尔大学综合专科医院眼科药物的处方做法、药物利用和配药后知识。方法:于2024年3月至2024年6月在贡达尔大学综合专科医院眼科进行解释性序贯混合方法研究。定量数据采用访谈者管理的结构化问卷收集,然后将图表评审输入EpiData 4.6版本,并使用SPSS 25版本进行分析。通过描述性统计和二元logistic回归分析确定了影响点药后知识的因素,显著性水平p < 0.05,结果具有95%的置信区间。通过深度访谈收集定性数据,并使用OpenCode 4.2版软件进行主题分析。结果:调查对象多为老年男性,眼部疾病患病率较高。眼科用药以溶液为主(53.2%),抗菌药物以四环素为主(41.2%)。固定剂量联合用药主要为类固醇-抗生素联合用药。平均每张处方的药品数量为1.43种,仿制药占90.37%,66.8%的处方来自国家基本药物目录。强度、剂量、频次和持续时间分别占处方的68.3%、31.5%、92.4%和31.5%。38%的患者配药后知识良好,11.5%的患者双眼用药,尽管只有一只眼睛感染。具有文凭或高等教育的患者(AOR = 2.46, 95% CI 1.35, 4.46)比不能读写的患者更有可能拥有更好的药物知识。结论:除单张处方药品数量和调剂时间外,大部分处方指标均低于世界卫生组织推荐标准。此外,大多数眼科处方缺乏充分和完整的处方信息,大多数患者对配药后知识不足。这些发现强调迫切需要改进处方实践,加强咨询,并实施有针对性的教育计划,以确保更安全和更有效的眼科护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of drug utilization evaluation and post-dispensing knowledge of ophthalmic medications: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.

Background: Irrational prescription of medication is a common issue in clinical practice, particularly for eye disorders that can affect vision. This study aimed to assess the prescribing practices, drug utilization, and post-dispensing knowledge of ophthalmic medications at the University of Gondar Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital in Northwest Ethiopia.

Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods study was conducted at the ophthalmology department of the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from March 2024 to June 2024. Quantitative data were collected using an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire, and chart review was then entered into EpiData version 4.6 and analyzed using SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics were computed and Binary logistic regression analyses identified factors influencing post-dispensing knowledge, with a significance level of p < 0.05 and results presented with 95% confidence intervals. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews and analyzed thematically using OpenCode software version 4.2.

Results: Most respondents were elderly and male, with a higher prevalence of ocular diseases. Ophthalmic medications were predominantly solutions (53.2%), with antibacterial drugs (41.2%), especially Tetracycline, being the most common. Fixed-dose combination drugs were primarily steroid-antibiotic combinations. The average number of drugs per prescription was 1.43, with 90.37% of prescriptions being generic and 66.8% from the National Essential Drug List. Strength, dose, frequency, and duration were recorded in 68.3%, 31.5%, 92.4%, and 31.5% of the prescriptions, respectively. Post-dispensing knowledge was good in 38% of the patients, and 11.5% used medication in both eyes despite infection in only one. Patients with a diploma or higher education (AOR = 2.46, 95% CI 1.35, 4.46) were more likely to have better medication knowledge than those unable to read or write.

Conclusion: Most prescribing indicators were below the e World Health Organization's recommended standards, except for the number of drugs per prescription and the dispensing time. In addition, most ophthalmic prescriptions lacked adequate and complete prescribing information, and most patients had insufficient post-dispensing knowledge. These findings highlight the urgent need to improve prescribing practices, enhance counseling, and implement targeted educational programs to ensure safer and more effective ophthalmic care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信