儿童颞骨骨折:一项系统综述

Karan Gandhi , Chloe Pulver , Peng You
{"title":"儿童颞骨骨折:一项系统综述","authors":"Karan Gandhi ,&nbsp;Chloe Pulver ,&nbsp;Peng You","doi":"10.1016/j.yjpso.2025.100208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Pediatric temporal bone fractures, pose significant risks including hearing loss, facial nerve paralysis, and intracranial complications. This study aims to address the knowledge gap in outcomes following these fractures in children.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search across Embase, MEDLINE (PubMed), and Web of Science was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome analyzed was hearing loss, with secondary outcomes including facial nerve injury, and other complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study included 15 articles with outcomes for 1044 patients. The risk of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was higher in otic capsule-violating (OCV) fractures than otic capsule-sparing (OCS) fractures (OR 28.57, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Facial nerve injury was more likely in OCV fractures (OR 4.59, <em>p</em> = 0.0162). Transverse fractures had higher odds of SNHL compared to longitudinal fractures (OR 5.181, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). OCV fractures had higher odds of facial nerve injury compared to OCS fractures (OR 4.59, <em>p</em> = 0.0162), and transverse fractures had higher odds of facial nerve injury compared to longitudinal fractures (OR 3.02, <em>p</em> = 0.0146). No significant differences in conductive hearing loss were found between fracture types. Only 57 % of patients had audiometric data available.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study indicates no single classification system accurately predicts outcomes for all pediatric temporal bone fractures. OCV fractures do carry a higher risk of SNHL than OCS fractures. However, this should not replace a thorough clinical assessment and audiometric testing. Long-term studies are needed to improve patient care due to limited data on long-term effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric temporal bone fractures: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Karan Gandhi ,&nbsp;Chloe Pulver ,&nbsp;Peng You\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yjpso.2025.100208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Pediatric temporal bone fractures, pose significant risks including hearing loss, facial nerve paralysis, and intracranial complications. This study aims to address the knowledge gap in outcomes following these fractures in children.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search across Embase, MEDLINE (PubMed), and Web of Science was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome analyzed was hearing loss, with secondary outcomes including facial nerve injury, and other complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study included 15 articles with outcomes for 1044 patients. The risk of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was higher in otic capsule-violating (OCV) fractures than otic capsule-sparing (OCS) fractures (OR 28.57, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Facial nerve injury was more likely in OCV fractures (OR 4.59, <em>p</em> = 0.0162). Transverse fractures had higher odds of SNHL compared to longitudinal fractures (OR 5.181, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). OCV fractures had higher odds of facial nerve injury compared to OCS fractures (OR 4.59, <em>p</em> = 0.0162), and transverse fractures had higher odds of facial nerve injury compared to longitudinal fractures (OR 3.02, <em>p</em> = 0.0146). No significant differences in conductive hearing loss were found between fracture types. Only 57 % of patients had audiometric data available.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study indicates no single classification system accurately predicts outcomes for all pediatric temporal bone fractures. OCV fractures do carry a higher risk of SNHL than OCS fractures. However, this should not replace a thorough clinical assessment and audiometric testing. Long-term studies are needed to improve patient care due to limited data on long-term effects.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949711625000176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949711625000176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:儿童颞骨骨折会造成听力损失、面神经麻痹和颅内并发症。本研究旨在解决儿童骨折后预后方面的知识差距。方法按照PRISMA指南对Embase、MEDLINE (PubMed)和Web of Science进行综合文献检索。分析的主要结局是听力损失,次要结局包括面神经损伤和其他并发症。结果本研究纳入15篇文章,1044例患者。耳囊侵犯骨折(OCV)发生感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)的风险高于耳囊保留骨折(OCS) (OR 28.57, p <;0.001)。OCV骨折更容易出现面神经损伤(OR 4.59, p = 0.0162)。横向骨折发生SNHL的几率高于纵向骨折(OR 5.181, p <;0.001)。OCV骨折面神经损伤的发生率高于OCS骨折(OR 4.59, p = 0.0162),横向骨折面神经损伤的发生率高于纵向骨折(OR 3.02, p = 0.0146)。传导性听力损失在骨折类型间无显著差异。只有57%的患者有听力测量数据。结论本研究表明,没有单一的分类系统能准确预测所有儿童颞骨骨折的预后。OCV骨折发生SNHL的风险确实高于OCS骨折。然而,这不应该取代彻底的临床评估和听力测试。由于长期影响的数据有限,需要长期研究来改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pediatric temporal bone fractures: A systematic review

Purpose

Pediatric temporal bone fractures, pose significant risks including hearing loss, facial nerve paralysis, and intracranial complications. This study aims to address the knowledge gap in outcomes following these fractures in children.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search across Embase, MEDLINE (PubMed), and Web of Science was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome analyzed was hearing loss, with secondary outcomes including facial nerve injury, and other complications.

Results

This study included 15 articles with outcomes for 1044 patients. The risk of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was higher in otic capsule-violating (OCV) fractures than otic capsule-sparing (OCS) fractures (OR 28.57, p < 0.001). Facial nerve injury was more likely in OCV fractures (OR 4.59, p = 0.0162). Transverse fractures had higher odds of SNHL compared to longitudinal fractures (OR 5.181, p < 0.001). OCV fractures had higher odds of facial nerve injury compared to OCS fractures (OR 4.59, p = 0.0162), and transverse fractures had higher odds of facial nerve injury compared to longitudinal fractures (OR 3.02, p = 0.0146). No significant differences in conductive hearing loss were found between fracture types. Only 57 % of patients had audiometric data available.

Conclusions

This study indicates no single classification system accurately predicts outcomes for all pediatric temporal bone fractures. OCV fractures do carry a higher risk of SNHL than OCS fractures. However, this should not replace a thorough clinical assessment and audiometric testing. Long-term studies are needed to improve patient care due to limited data on long-term effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信