{"title":"儿童颞骨骨折:一项系统综述","authors":"Karan Gandhi , Chloe Pulver , Peng You","doi":"10.1016/j.yjpso.2025.100208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Pediatric temporal bone fractures, pose significant risks including hearing loss, facial nerve paralysis, and intracranial complications. This study aims to address the knowledge gap in outcomes following these fractures in children.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search across Embase, MEDLINE (PubMed), and Web of Science was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome analyzed was hearing loss, with secondary outcomes including facial nerve injury, and other complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study included 15 articles with outcomes for 1044 patients. The risk of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was higher in otic capsule-violating (OCV) fractures than otic capsule-sparing (OCS) fractures (OR 28.57, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Facial nerve injury was more likely in OCV fractures (OR 4.59, <em>p</em> = 0.0162). Transverse fractures had higher odds of SNHL compared to longitudinal fractures (OR 5.181, <em>p</em> < 0.001). OCV fractures had higher odds of facial nerve injury compared to OCS fractures (OR 4.59, <em>p</em> = 0.0162), and transverse fractures had higher odds of facial nerve injury compared to longitudinal fractures (OR 3.02, <em>p</em> = 0.0146). No significant differences in conductive hearing loss were found between fracture types. Only 57 % of patients had audiometric data available.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study indicates no single classification system accurately predicts outcomes for all pediatric temporal bone fractures. OCV fractures do carry a higher risk of SNHL than OCS fractures. However, this should not replace a thorough clinical assessment and audiometric testing. Long-term studies are needed to improve patient care due to limited data on long-term effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric temporal bone fractures: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Karan Gandhi , Chloe Pulver , Peng You\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yjpso.2025.100208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Pediatric temporal bone fractures, pose significant risks including hearing loss, facial nerve paralysis, and intracranial complications. This study aims to address the knowledge gap in outcomes following these fractures in children.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search across Embase, MEDLINE (PubMed), and Web of Science was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome analyzed was hearing loss, with secondary outcomes including facial nerve injury, and other complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study included 15 articles with outcomes for 1044 patients. The risk of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was higher in otic capsule-violating (OCV) fractures than otic capsule-sparing (OCS) fractures (OR 28.57, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Facial nerve injury was more likely in OCV fractures (OR 4.59, <em>p</em> = 0.0162). Transverse fractures had higher odds of SNHL compared to longitudinal fractures (OR 5.181, <em>p</em> < 0.001). OCV fractures had higher odds of facial nerve injury compared to OCS fractures (OR 4.59, <em>p</em> = 0.0162), and transverse fractures had higher odds of facial nerve injury compared to longitudinal fractures (OR 3.02, <em>p</em> = 0.0146). No significant differences in conductive hearing loss were found between fracture types. Only 57 % of patients had audiometric data available.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study indicates no single classification system accurately predicts outcomes for all pediatric temporal bone fractures. OCV fractures do carry a higher risk of SNHL than OCS fractures. However, this should not replace a thorough clinical assessment and audiometric testing. Long-term studies are needed to improve patient care due to limited data on long-term effects.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949711625000176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949711625000176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:儿童颞骨骨折会造成听力损失、面神经麻痹和颅内并发症。本研究旨在解决儿童骨折后预后方面的知识差距。方法按照PRISMA指南对Embase、MEDLINE (PubMed)和Web of Science进行综合文献检索。分析的主要结局是听力损失,次要结局包括面神经损伤和其他并发症。结果本研究纳入15篇文章,1044例患者。耳囊侵犯骨折(OCV)发生感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)的风险高于耳囊保留骨折(OCS) (OR 28.57, p <;0.001)。OCV骨折更容易出现面神经损伤(OR 4.59, p = 0.0162)。横向骨折发生SNHL的几率高于纵向骨折(OR 5.181, p <;0.001)。OCV骨折面神经损伤的发生率高于OCS骨折(OR 4.59, p = 0.0162),横向骨折面神经损伤的发生率高于纵向骨折(OR 3.02, p = 0.0146)。传导性听力损失在骨折类型间无显著差异。只有57%的患者有听力测量数据。结论本研究表明,没有单一的分类系统能准确预测所有儿童颞骨骨折的预后。OCV骨折发生SNHL的风险确实高于OCS骨折。然而,这不应该取代彻底的临床评估和听力测试。由于长期影响的数据有限,需要长期研究来改善患者护理。
Pediatric temporal bone fractures: A systematic review
Purpose
Pediatric temporal bone fractures, pose significant risks including hearing loss, facial nerve paralysis, and intracranial complications. This study aims to address the knowledge gap in outcomes following these fractures in children.
Methods
A comprehensive literature search across Embase, MEDLINE (PubMed), and Web of Science was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome analyzed was hearing loss, with secondary outcomes including facial nerve injury, and other complications.
Results
This study included 15 articles with outcomes for 1044 patients. The risk of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was higher in otic capsule-violating (OCV) fractures than otic capsule-sparing (OCS) fractures (OR 28.57, p < 0.001). Facial nerve injury was more likely in OCV fractures (OR 4.59, p = 0.0162). Transverse fractures had higher odds of SNHL compared to longitudinal fractures (OR 5.181, p < 0.001). OCV fractures had higher odds of facial nerve injury compared to OCS fractures (OR 4.59, p = 0.0162), and transverse fractures had higher odds of facial nerve injury compared to longitudinal fractures (OR 3.02, p = 0.0146). No significant differences in conductive hearing loss were found between fracture types. Only 57 % of patients had audiometric data available.
Conclusions
This study indicates no single classification system accurately predicts outcomes for all pediatric temporal bone fractures. OCV fractures do carry a higher risk of SNHL than OCS fractures. However, this should not replace a thorough clinical assessment and audiometric testing. Long-term studies are needed to improve patient care due to limited data on long-term effects.