Yu Gu , Xiting Liu , Qiao Liu , Fanxing Kong , Kai Lan , Xin Chang , Mingyu Zhang , Guangchao Zhuang , Houjie Wang
{"title":"全新世沉积环境和氧化还原状态控制的陆架沉积物中活性铁源汇过程:来自中黄海泥的启示","authors":"Yu Gu , Xiting Liu , Qiao Liu , Fanxing Kong , Kai Lan , Xin Chang , Mingyu Zhang , Guangchao Zhuang , Houjie Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.chemgeo.2025.122780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Iron in shelf sediments is crucial in the marine iron cycle, significantly impacting the global C-S-Fe biogeochemical cycles. However, its fate in shelf sediments remains unclear. This study focuses on sediment core YSCW-1 from the Central Yellow Sea Mud, utilizing sediment grain size, redox-sensitive elements U and Mo, and iron speciation to explore the control mechanisms of redox states and sedimentary environments on highly reactive iron since the Holocene. Sediments in core YSCW-1 can be classified into U1, U2, U3, and U4 units based on lithology, grain size, and geochemical characteristics. The results indicate that iron in the Central Yellow Sea Mud is relatively enriched in the mud-depocenter, occurring in fine-grained terrestrial sediments derived from continental chemical weathering, but its fate varies among different units. In U1 (9.3–9.0 ka), iron was mainly sourced from the Yellow River, deposited under oxic–suboxic conditions with pyrite iron as the dominant reactive iron speciation. In U2 (9.0–7.3 ka), an estuarine environment with low salinity and oxidizing conditions contributed to the increase of carbonate iron. In U3 (7.3–3.1 ka), the establishment of modern circulation in the Yellow Sea led to the dominance of Yangtze River-derived sediments, and the stable, low-energy environment promoted the prevalence of pyrite iron. U4 was deposited under oxic–suboxic conditions, with the iron dissimilatory reduction being the dominant process of organic matter mineralization, resulting in a decline in pyrite iron and an increase in magnetic iron. Our findings suggest that sedimentary environments and redox states jointly control the process of iron speciation on the continental shelf.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9847,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Geology","volume":"683 ","pages":"Article 122780"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Source-sink process of reactive iron in shelf sediments controlled by Holocene depositional environments and redox states: Insight from the Central Yellow Sea Mud\",\"authors\":\"Yu Gu , Xiting Liu , Qiao Liu , Fanxing Kong , Kai Lan , Xin Chang , Mingyu Zhang , Guangchao Zhuang , Houjie Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chemgeo.2025.122780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Iron in shelf sediments is crucial in the marine iron cycle, significantly impacting the global C-S-Fe biogeochemical cycles. However, its fate in shelf sediments remains unclear. This study focuses on sediment core YSCW-1 from the Central Yellow Sea Mud, utilizing sediment grain size, redox-sensitive elements U and Mo, and iron speciation to explore the control mechanisms of redox states and sedimentary environments on highly reactive iron since the Holocene. Sediments in core YSCW-1 can be classified into U1, U2, U3, and U4 units based on lithology, grain size, and geochemical characteristics. The results indicate that iron in the Central Yellow Sea Mud is relatively enriched in the mud-depocenter, occurring in fine-grained terrestrial sediments derived from continental chemical weathering, but its fate varies among different units. In U1 (9.3–9.0 ka), iron was mainly sourced from the Yellow River, deposited under oxic–suboxic conditions with pyrite iron as the dominant reactive iron speciation. In U2 (9.0–7.3 ka), an estuarine environment with low salinity and oxidizing conditions contributed to the increase of carbonate iron. In U3 (7.3–3.1 ka), the establishment of modern circulation in the Yellow Sea led to the dominance of Yangtze River-derived sediments, and the stable, low-energy environment promoted the prevalence of pyrite iron. U4 was deposited under oxic–suboxic conditions, with the iron dissimilatory reduction being the dominant process of organic matter mineralization, resulting in a decline in pyrite iron and an increase in magnetic iron. Our findings suggest that sedimentary environments and redox states jointly control the process of iron speciation on the continental shelf.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Geology\",\"volume\":\"683 \",\"pages\":\"Article 122780\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009254125001706\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009254125001706","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Source-sink process of reactive iron in shelf sediments controlled by Holocene depositional environments and redox states: Insight from the Central Yellow Sea Mud
Iron in shelf sediments is crucial in the marine iron cycle, significantly impacting the global C-S-Fe biogeochemical cycles. However, its fate in shelf sediments remains unclear. This study focuses on sediment core YSCW-1 from the Central Yellow Sea Mud, utilizing sediment grain size, redox-sensitive elements U and Mo, and iron speciation to explore the control mechanisms of redox states and sedimentary environments on highly reactive iron since the Holocene. Sediments in core YSCW-1 can be classified into U1, U2, U3, and U4 units based on lithology, grain size, and geochemical characteristics. The results indicate that iron in the Central Yellow Sea Mud is relatively enriched in the mud-depocenter, occurring in fine-grained terrestrial sediments derived from continental chemical weathering, but its fate varies among different units. In U1 (9.3–9.0 ka), iron was mainly sourced from the Yellow River, deposited under oxic–suboxic conditions with pyrite iron as the dominant reactive iron speciation. In U2 (9.0–7.3 ka), an estuarine environment with low salinity and oxidizing conditions contributed to the increase of carbonate iron. In U3 (7.3–3.1 ka), the establishment of modern circulation in the Yellow Sea led to the dominance of Yangtze River-derived sediments, and the stable, low-energy environment promoted the prevalence of pyrite iron. U4 was deposited under oxic–suboxic conditions, with the iron dissimilatory reduction being the dominant process of organic matter mineralization, resulting in a decline in pyrite iron and an increase in magnetic iron. Our findings suggest that sedimentary environments and redox states jointly control the process of iron speciation on the continental shelf.
期刊介绍:
Chemical Geology is an international journal that publishes original research papers on isotopic and elemental geochemistry, geochronology and cosmochemistry.
The Journal focuses on chemical processes in igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary petrology, low- and high-temperature aqueous solutions, biogeochemistry, the environment and cosmochemistry.
Papers that are field, experimentally, or computationally based are appropriate if they are of broad international interest. The Journal generally does not publish papers that are primarily of regional or local interest, or which are primarily focused on remediation and applied geochemistry.
The Journal also welcomes innovative papers dealing with significant analytical advances that are of wide interest in the community and extend significantly beyond the scope of what would be included in the methods section of a standard research paper.