实施一种新的仅限标识的学校街道方法:促进者、障碍和可感知的结果

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yvanna Todorova , Denise Kendrick , Luisa Vargas , Veronica Varela-Mato , Mark Gussy , Lauren B. Sherar , Elizabeth Orton , Jo Barnes
{"title":"实施一种新的仅限标识的学校街道方法:促进者、障碍和可感知的结果","authors":"Yvanna Todorova ,&nbsp;Denise Kendrick ,&nbsp;Luisa Vargas ,&nbsp;Veronica Varela-Mato ,&nbsp;Mark Gussy ,&nbsp;Lauren B. Sherar ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Orton ,&nbsp;Jo Barnes","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2025.102049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>School Streets is a time-specific traffic restriction scheme aimed to reduce traffic around schools during pick up and drop off times. This is believed to benefit school children by reducing surrounding air pollution, improving child safety, and encouraging active travel. Newcastle City Council implemented a novel signage-only School Streets at four primary schools in Newcastle.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Interviews (n = 46) and focus groups (n = 7 groups with a total of 48 participants) were conducted with stakeholders, school leaders, parents, pupils, and residents to understand the facilitators and barriers of the implementation of School Streets and the perceived effectiveness of this scheme. The interview guide and analysis were informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most facilitator themes related to the simplicity of the signage-only design and the existing work structures. The barriers centred around infrequent communication within the inner setting (local authority, delivery partner and school leadership) and sustaining the level of engagement. The recipients of the scheme were in favour of the messaging behind School Streets but did not perceive changes in traffic or travel behaviour in the area, potentially related to the lack of enforcement. Minimal changes to travel behaviour may be due to external factors such as distance lived from school or physical infrastructure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While the signage-only approach to School Streets reduced the implementation cost and infrastructure changes required, it required a high level of engagement and communication. Recipients desired more enforcement to increase and maintain compliance of the scheme long-term.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 102049"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing a novel signage-only School Streets approach: Facilitators, barriers, and perceived outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Yvanna Todorova ,&nbsp;Denise Kendrick ,&nbsp;Luisa Vargas ,&nbsp;Veronica Varela-Mato ,&nbsp;Mark Gussy ,&nbsp;Lauren B. Sherar ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Orton ,&nbsp;Jo Barnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jth.2025.102049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>School Streets is a time-specific traffic restriction scheme aimed to reduce traffic around schools during pick up and drop off times. This is believed to benefit school children by reducing surrounding air pollution, improving child safety, and encouraging active travel. Newcastle City Council implemented a novel signage-only School Streets at four primary schools in Newcastle.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Interviews (n = 46) and focus groups (n = 7 groups with a total of 48 participants) were conducted with stakeholders, school leaders, parents, pupils, and residents to understand the facilitators and barriers of the implementation of School Streets and the perceived effectiveness of this scheme. The interview guide and analysis were informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most facilitator themes related to the simplicity of the signage-only design and the existing work structures. The barriers centred around infrequent communication within the inner setting (local authority, delivery partner and school leadership) and sustaining the level of engagement. The recipients of the scheme were in favour of the messaging behind School Streets but did not perceive changes in traffic or travel behaviour in the area, potentially related to the lack of enforcement. Minimal changes to travel behaviour may be due to external factors such as distance lived from school or physical infrastructure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While the signage-only approach to School Streets reduced the implementation cost and infrastructure changes required, it required a high level of engagement and communication. Recipients desired more enforcement to increase and maintain compliance of the scheme long-term.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102049\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525000696\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525000696","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学校街道是一个特定时间的交通限制计划,旨在减少接送时间学校周围的交通。这被认为有利于学校的孩子减少周围的空气污染,提高儿童的安全,并鼓励积极的旅行。纽卡斯尔市议会在纽卡斯尔的四所小学实施了一项新的仅限指示牌的学校街道。方法对利益相关者、学校领导、家长、学生和居民进行访谈(n = 46)和焦点小组(n = 7组,共48名参与者),了解学校街道实施的促进因素和障碍以及该计划的感知有效性。访谈指南和分析是根据《执行研究综合框架》编写的。结果:大多数促进主题与标识设计的简单性和现有的工作结构有关。障碍集中在内部环境(地方当局、交付合作伙伴和学校领导)中不频繁的沟通和维持参与水平。该计划的接受者赞成学校街背后的信息传递,但没有意识到该地区交通或旅行行为的变化,这可能与缺乏执法有关。出行行为的微小变化可能是由于与学校的距离或物理基础设施等外部因素造成的。虽然学校街道的标识方法降低了实施成本和所需的基础设施变化,但它需要高水平的参与和沟通。受助人希望加强执法,以增加和维持对计划的长期遵守。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing a novel signage-only School Streets approach: Facilitators, barriers, and perceived outcomes

Background

School Streets is a time-specific traffic restriction scheme aimed to reduce traffic around schools during pick up and drop off times. This is believed to benefit school children by reducing surrounding air pollution, improving child safety, and encouraging active travel. Newcastle City Council implemented a novel signage-only School Streets at four primary schools in Newcastle.

Methods

Interviews (n = 46) and focus groups (n = 7 groups with a total of 48 participants) were conducted with stakeholders, school leaders, parents, pupils, and residents to understand the facilitators and barriers of the implementation of School Streets and the perceived effectiveness of this scheme. The interview guide and analysis were informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Results

Most facilitator themes related to the simplicity of the signage-only design and the existing work structures. The barriers centred around infrequent communication within the inner setting (local authority, delivery partner and school leadership) and sustaining the level of engagement. The recipients of the scheme were in favour of the messaging behind School Streets but did not perceive changes in traffic or travel behaviour in the area, potentially related to the lack of enforcement. Minimal changes to travel behaviour may be due to external factors such as distance lived from school or physical infrastructure.

Conclusion

While the signage-only approach to School Streets reduced the implementation cost and infrastructure changes required, it required a high level of engagement and communication. Recipients desired more enforcement to increase and maintain compliance of the scheme long-term.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信