IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Julien Cegarra , Hélène Unrein , Jean-Marc Andre , Oriane Mouton , Jordan Navarro
{"title":"Driving among autonomous vehicles: The effect of initial trust and driving style on driving behaviors","authors":"Julien Cegarra ,&nbsp;Hélène Unrein ,&nbsp;Jean-Marc Andre ,&nbsp;Oriane Mouton ,&nbsp;Jordan Navarro","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.03.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although autonomous vehicles (AVs) are believed to reduce road accidents, they can be involved in accidents partly due to Conventional Vehicles (CVs) drivers’ erroneous expectations that affect their risk-taking behaviors, such as following the AVs too closely and/or at an unsafe speed. In this article, the main objective is to propose a first exploratory study on how our expectations as drivers of conventional vehicles can shape our driving in the presence of autonomous vehicles. We investigated the role of initial trust in AVs on CV drivers’ behaviors toward AVs. Ninety-five participants were confronted with trust-promoting or trust-lowering video clips of AVs driving. Individual driving behaviors were then assessed using a modified version of the Driving Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) that distinguishes between lapses, errors, and ordinary and emotional violations. We also collected respondents’ self-reported driving styles with the Multidimensional Driving Style Inventory (MDSI). The results showed that the trust-promoted group reported more deliberate ordinary and emotional violations than the trust-lowered group. These ordinary violations, due to their potential link to road accidents, highlight the importance of fostering realistic expectations about AVs. The emotional violations were not initially anticipated but were attributed to the unfamiliar and potentially frustrating behaviors exhibited by AVs. Finally, we emphasize the importance of trust calibration of<!--> <!-->road users toward autonomous vehicles<!--> <!-->to ensure road safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"112 ","pages":"Pages 99-110"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825001159","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管自动驾驶汽车(AV)被认为可以减少道路交通事故,但它们也可能发生交通事故,部分原因是传统车辆(CV)驾驶员的错误预期影响了他们的冒险行为,例如跟车过近和/或以不安全的速度跟车。本文的主要目的是首次提出一项探索性研究,探讨我们作为传统车辆驾驶员的预期如何影响我们在自动驾驶车辆面前的驾驶行为。我们调查了对自动驾驶汽车的初始信任对自动驾驶汽车驾驶员行为的影响。我们让 95 名参与者观看了自动驾驶汽车的视频短片,这些视频短片会提升或降低他们对自动驾驶汽车的信任度。然后,我们使用改良版的驾驶行为问卷(DBQ)对个人驾驶行为进行了评估,该问卷区分了失误、错误、普通违规和情绪违规。我们还使用多维驾驶风格量表(MDSI)收集了受访者自我报告的驾驶风格。结果显示,信任度提升组比信任度降低组报告了更多故意的普通违规和情绪违规。这些普通违规行为可能与交通事故有关,因此强调了培养对自动驾驶汽车的现实预期的重要性。情感违规行为最初并没有预料到,而是归因于无人驾驶汽车表现出的陌生和潜在的令人沮丧的行为。最后,我们强调了道路使用者对自动驾驶汽车的信任校准对于确保道路安全的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Driving among autonomous vehicles: The effect of initial trust and driving style on driving behaviors
Although autonomous vehicles (AVs) are believed to reduce road accidents, they can be involved in accidents partly due to Conventional Vehicles (CVs) drivers’ erroneous expectations that affect their risk-taking behaviors, such as following the AVs too closely and/or at an unsafe speed. In this article, the main objective is to propose a first exploratory study on how our expectations as drivers of conventional vehicles can shape our driving in the presence of autonomous vehicles. We investigated the role of initial trust in AVs on CV drivers’ behaviors toward AVs. Ninety-five participants were confronted with trust-promoting or trust-lowering video clips of AVs driving. Individual driving behaviors were then assessed using a modified version of the Driving Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) that distinguishes between lapses, errors, and ordinary and emotional violations. We also collected respondents’ self-reported driving styles with the Multidimensional Driving Style Inventory (MDSI). The results showed that the trust-promoted group reported more deliberate ordinary and emotional violations than the trust-lowered group. These ordinary violations, due to their potential link to road accidents, highlight the importance of fostering realistic expectations about AVs. The emotional violations were not initially anticipated but were attributed to the unfamiliar and potentially frustrating behaviors exhibited by AVs. Finally, we emphasize the importance of trust calibration of road users toward autonomous vehicles to ensure road safety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信