调查以人为中心的护理计划在护理院在英格兰:实践和背景因素的探索性研究

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Jacqueline Damant, Yuri Hamashima, Madalina Toma, Nick Smith, Jonathan Taylor, Thais Caprioli, Sarah Jasim, Laura Prato, Hugh Mcleod, Clarissa Giebel, Michele Peters, Anna Ferguson Montague, Lynne Wright, Martin Knapp, Anne‐Marie Towers
{"title":"调查以人为中心的护理计划在护理院在英格兰:实践和背景因素的探索性研究","authors":"Jacqueline Damant, Yuri Hamashima, Madalina Toma, Nick Smith, Jonathan Taylor, Thais Caprioli, Sarah Jasim, Laura Prato, Hugh Mcleod, Clarissa Giebel, Michele Peters, Anna Ferguson Montague, Lynne Wright, Martin Knapp, Anne‐Marie Towers","doi":"10.1111/jan.16965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimsTo report how person‐centred care principles are applied to care planning and to explore the contextual factors affecting their implementation in older adult care homes in England.DesignA combined framework analysis and quantitative content analysis study.MethodsUsing a semi‐structured questionnaire, we interviewed 22 care home managers in England, exploring topics around care planning processes. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed through a combined framework approach and content analysis.ResultsMost care home managers discussed person‐centred care planning in terms of understanding residents' values and preferences and their engagement in decision‐making. Factors facilitating person‐centred planning implementation included accessible planning tools, supportive care home leadership, effective communication and collaborative partnerships. Inhibiting factors included regulatory and care practice misalignment, time constraints and adverse staffing conditions.ConclusionDifferences between care home practitioners' understanding and practice of person‐centred care planning require further examination to improve understanding of the sector's complexity and to develop suitable care planning instruments.Implications for the ProfessionFindings demonstrate a need for improved staff access to specialised person‐centred care training and an opportunity for care home nursing practitioners to lead the co‐development of digital person‐centred care planning tools that reflect the reality of long‐term care settings.ImpactIdentifying factors influencing the implementation of holistic approaches to care planning makes clear the need for modernising long‐term care policy and practice to adapt to the contemporary challenges of the care home sector.Reporting MethodStudy reporting was guided by the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research.Patient or Public ContributionTwo public involvement advisors with lived experience of caring for a relative living in a care home contributed to the development of the interview guide, advised on care home engagement, guided the interpretation of the findings and commented on the drafted manuscript.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating Person‐Centred Care Planning in Care Homes Across England: An Exploratory Study of Practices and Contextual Factors\",\"authors\":\"Jacqueline Damant, Yuri Hamashima, Madalina Toma, Nick Smith, Jonathan Taylor, Thais Caprioli, Sarah Jasim, Laura Prato, Hugh Mcleod, Clarissa Giebel, Michele Peters, Anna Ferguson Montague, Lynne Wright, Martin Knapp, Anne‐Marie Towers\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jan.16965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AimsTo report how person‐centred care principles are applied to care planning and to explore the contextual factors affecting their implementation in older adult care homes in England.DesignA combined framework analysis and quantitative content analysis study.MethodsUsing a semi‐structured questionnaire, we interviewed 22 care home managers in England, exploring topics around care planning processes. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed through a combined framework approach and content analysis.ResultsMost care home managers discussed person‐centred care planning in terms of understanding residents' values and preferences and their engagement in decision‐making. Factors facilitating person‐centred planning implementation included accessible planning tools, supportive care home leadership, effective communication and collaborative partnerships. Inhibiting factors included regulatory and care practice misalignment, time constraints and adverse staffing conditions.ConclusionDifferences between care home practitioners' understanding and practice of person‐centred care planning require further examination to improve understanding of the sector's complexity and to develop suitable care planning instruments.Implications for the ProfessionFindings demonstrate a need for improved staff access to specialised person‐centred care training and an opportunity for care home nursing practitioners to lead the co‐development of digital person‐centred care planning tools that reflect the reality of long‐term care settings.ImpactIdentifying factors influencing the implementation of holistic approaches to care planning makes clear the need for modernising long‐term care policy and practice to adapt to the contemporary challenges of the care home sector.Reporting MethodStudy reporting was guided by the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research.Patient or Public ContributionTwo public involvement advisors with lived experience of caring for a relative living in a care home contributed to the development of the interview guide, advised on care home engagement, guided the interpretation of the findings and commented on the drafted manuscript.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16965\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16965","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的报告以人为本的护理原则如何应用于护理计划,并探讨影响其在英格兰老年人护理之家实施的环境因素。设计采用框架分析与定量内容分析相结合的研究方法。方法采用半结构化问卷,我们采访了22位英国养老院的管理者,探讨了护理计划流程的主题。录音被逐字抄录。通过结合框架方法和内容分析来分析转录本。结果大多数养老院管理者在了解居民的价值观和偏好以及他们参与决策方面讨论了以人为本的护理计划。促进以人为本的规划实施的因素包括可访问的规划工具、支持性养老院领导、有效的沟通和合作伙伴关系。抑制因素包括监管和护理实践偏差,时间限制和不利的人员配备条件。结论:养老院从业者对以人为本的护理计划的理解和实践之间的差异需要进一步研究,以提高对该部门复杂性的理解,并开发合适的护理计划工具。对专业的影响研究结果表明,需要改善员工获得以人为本的专业护理培训的机会,并为养老院护理从业人员提供机会,领导共同开发反映长期护理环境现实的数字以人为本的护理计划工具。影响确定影响护理规划整体方法实施的因素,明确了长期护理政策和实践现代化的必要性,以适应养老院部门的当代挑战。报告方法研究报告遵循《定性研究报告准则》。病人或公众贡献两位有照顾住在护理院的亲属的实际经验的公众参与顾问为访谈指南的发展做出了贡献,就护理院参与提供了建议,指导了调查结果的解释,并对起草的手稿发表了评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating Person‐Centred Care Planning in Care Homes Across England: An Exploratory Study of Practices and Contextual Factors
AimsTo report how person‐centred care principles are applied to care planning and to explore the contextual factors affecting their implementation in older adult care homes in England.DesignA combined framework analysis and quantitative content analysis study.MethodsUsing a semi‐structured questionnaire, we interviewed 22 care home managers in England, exploring topics around care planning processes. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed through a combined framework approach and content analysis.ResultsMost care home managers discussed person‐centred care planning in terms of understanding residents' values and preferences and their engagement in decision‐making. Factors facilitating person‐centred planning implementation included accessible planning tools, supportive care home leadership, effective communication and collaborative partnerships. Inhibiting factors included regulatory and care practice misalignment, time constraints and adverse staffing conditions.ConclusionDifferences between care home practitioners' understanding and practice of person‐centred care planning require further examination to improve understanding of the sector's complexity and to develop suitable care planning instruments.Implications for the ProfessionFindings demonstrate a need for improved staff access to specialised person‐centred care training and an opportunity for care home nursing practitioners to lead the co‐development of digital person‐centred care planning tools that reflect the reality of long‐term care settings.ImpactIdentifying factors influencing the implementation of holistic approaches to care planning makes clear the need for modernising long‐term care policy and practice to adapt to the contemporary challenges of the care home sector.Reporting MethodStudy reporting was guided by the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research.Patient or Public ContributionTwo public involvement advisors with lived experience of caring for a relative living in a care home contributed to the development of the interview guide, advised on care home engagement, guided the interpretation of the findings and commented on the drafted manuscript.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信