针对2022年阿尔茨海默病治疗的全国覆盖决定,对提交给医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的公众意见进行了审查。

IF 2.5 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Journal of Law and the Biosciences Pub Date : 2025-04-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/jlb/lsaf004
Kaatje S Greenberg, Holly Fernandez Lynch, Chisom Nwakama, Jonathan Frumovitz, Samarth Setru, Ariel M Johnson, Saloni M Shah, Liliana Schadt, Matthew S McCoy, Allison K Hoffman, Emily A Largent
{"title":"针对2022年阿尔茨海默病治疗的全国覆盖决定,对提交给医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的公众意见进行了审查。","authors":"Kaatje S Greenberg, Holly Fernandez Lynch, Chisom Nwakama, Jonathan Frumovitz, Samarth Setru, Ariel M Johnson, Saloni M Shah, Liliana Schadt, Matthew S McCoy, Allison K Hoffman, Emily A Largent","doi":"10.1093/jlb/lsaf004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease with devastating personal and social consequences. In June 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval to aducanumab (Aduhelm; Biogen), a first-in-class monoclonal antibody (mAb) for treatment of AD. In July 2021, responding to the significant controversy sparked by aducanumab's approval, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) opened a National Coverage Determination (NCD) analysis for mAbs intended for the treatment of AD. CMS received a record number of public comments on the proposed NCD, which included a proposal for coverage with evidence development (CED). We undertook an in-depth qualitative analysis of those comments. Broad themes included: the appropriateness of FDA's approval of aducanumab; the nature of the relationship between CMS and FDA; anticipated downstream effects of CED on innovation and health equity; aducanumab's cost, value, and affordability; and whether aducanumab offered patients hope. The aducanumab controversy occurred at the intersection of multiple contentious issues; in the discussion, we contextualize our findings within these broader debates. Though Biogen pulled aducanumab from the market in early 2024, the effects of the public discourse surrounding its approval and coverage have been long-lasting and far-reaching, affecting health law, policy, and clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":56266,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and the Biosciences","volume":"12 1","pages":"lsaf004"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of public comments submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in response to the 2022 National Coverage Decision on treatment for Alzheimer's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Kaatje S Greenberg, Holly Fernandez Lynch, Chisom Nwakama, Jonathan Frumovitz, Samarth Setru, Ariel M Johnson, Saloni M Shah, Liliana Schadt, Matthew S McCoy, Allison K Hoffman, Emily A Largent\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jlb/lsaf004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease with devastating personal and social consequences. In June 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval to aducanumab (Aduhelm; Biogen), a first-in-class monoclonal antibody (mAb) for treatment of AD. In July 2021, responding to the significant controversy sparked by aducanumab's approval, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) opened a National Coverage Determination (NCD) analysis for mAbs intended for the treatment of AD. CMS received a record number of public comments on the proposed NCD, which included a proposal for coverage with evidence development (CED). We undertook an in-depth qualitative analysis of those comments. Broad themes included: the appropriateness of FDA's approval of aducanumab; the nature of the relationship between CMS and FDA; anticipated downstream effects of CED on innovation and health equity; aducanumab's cost, value, and affordability; and whether aducanumab offered patients hope. The aducanumab controversy occurred at the intersection of multiple contentious issues; in the discussion, we contextualize our findings within these broader debates. Though Biogen pulled aducanumab from the market in early 2024, the effects of the public discourse surrounding its approval and coverage have been long-lasting and far-reaching, affecting health law, policy, and clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Law and the Biosciences\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"lsaf004\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969149/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Law and the Biosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaf004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and the Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaf004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种神经退行性疾病,具有毁灭性的个人和社会后果。2021年6月,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)加速批准了aducanumab (Aduhelm;Biogen)是一种治疗AD的一流单克隆抗体(mAb)。2021年7月,针对aducanumab获批引发的重大争议,美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)对用于治疗阿尔兹海默症的单克隆抗体开展了全国覆盖确定(NCD)分析。CMS收到了关于拟议的非传染性疾病的创纪录数量的公众意见,其中包括一项涵盖证据发展(CED)的建议。我们对这些评论进行了深入的定性分析。广泛的主题包括:FDA批准aducanumab的适当性;CMS与FDA之间关系的本质;CED对创新和卫生公平的预期下游影响;Aducanumab的成本、价值和可负担性;以及aducanumab是否给患者带来了希望。aducanumab争议发生在多个争议问题的交叉点;在讨论中,我们将我们的发现置于这些更广泛的辩论中。尽管Biogen在2024年初将aducanumab从市场上撤下,但围绕其批准和覆盖的公众讨论的影响是持久而深远的,影响了卫生法律、政策和临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A review of public comments submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in response to the 2022 National Coverage Decision on treatment for Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease with devastating personal and social consequences. In June 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval to aducanumab (Aduhelm; Biogen), a first-in-class monoclonal antibody (mAb) for treatment of AD. In July 2021, responding to the significant controversy sparked by aducanumab's approval, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) opened a National Coverage Determination (NCD) analysis for mAbs intended for the treatment of AD. CMS received a record number of public comments on the proposed NCD, which included a proposal for coverage with evidence development (CED). We undertook an in-depth qualitative analysis of those comments. Broad themes included: the appropriateness of FDA's approval of aducanumab; the nature of the relationship between CMS and FDA; anticipated downstream effects of CED on innovation and health equity; aducanumab's cost, value, and affordability; and whether aducanumab offered patients hope. The aducanumab controversy occurred at the intersection of multiple contentious issues; in the discussion, we contextualize our findings within these broader debates. Though Biogen pulled aducanumab from the market in early 2024, the effects of the public discourse surrounding its approval and coverage have been long-lasting and far-reaching, affecting health law, policy, and clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Law and the Biosciences
Journal of Law and the Biosciences Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Law and the Biosciences (JLB) is the first fully Open Access peer-reviewed legal journal focused on the advances at the intersection of law and the biosciences. A co-venture between Duke University, Harvard University Law School, and Stanford University, and published by Oxford University Press, this open access, online, and interdisciplinary academic journal publishes cutting-edge scholarship in this important new field. The Journal contains original and response articles, essays, and commentaries on a wide range of topics, including bioethics, neuroethics, genetics, reproductive technologies, stem cells, enhancement, patent law, and food and drug regulation. JLB is published as one volume with three issues per year with new articles posted online on an ongoing basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信