大剂量他汀类药物预防缺血性卒中复发:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Annals of Saudi medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-03 DOI:10.5144/0256-4947.2025.112
Muhammed Siddique Shahid, Mariam Safwan Bourgleh, Adel Alharfi, Shahad Albariqi, Lamia Albalawi, Rema Alohali, Turki Albaqami, Moaz Safwan Bourgleh
{"title":"大剂量他汀类药物预防缺血性卒中复发:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Muhammed Siddique Shahid, Mariam Safwan Bourgleh, Adel Alharfi, Shahad Albariqi, Lamia Albalawi, Rema Alohali, Turki Albaqami, Moaz Safwan Bourgleh","doi":"10.5144/0256-4947.2025.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ischemic stroke (IS) is a leading cause of disability and mortality, with fatal outcomes increased with recurrent strokes. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the safety and efficacy of high-dose statins for secondary IS prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was regestered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024574088). Cochrane methodology was followed in this review and comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrial.gov, to include all RCTs conducted from 2004 to 2024, comparing high-dose statins (simvastatin ≥40 mg, atorvastatin ≥40 mg, and rosuvastatin ≥20 mg) with low-dose statins, placebo, or standard care. Outcomes of this review were recurrent IS reduction and adverse events reported in RCTs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine RCTs involving 5,503 patients, with male patients ranging from 25.8% to 81.6% were included. Compared to controls, high-dose statins did not significantly reduce risks for secondary IS (OR 0.78, 95% CI [0.61, 1.00], <i>P</i>=.05) and hemorrhagic stroke (OR 0.85, 95% CI [0.56, 1.29], <i>P</i>=.45). Furthermore, no differences were observed in mortality rates and adverse events between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with high dose statins didn't reduce the risk of stroke recurrence or improve mortality, though further research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":93875,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Saudi medicine","volume":"45 2","pages":"112-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-dose statins for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammed Siddique Shahid, Mariam Safwan Bourgleh, Adel Alharfi, Shahad Albariqi, Lamia Albalawi, Rema Alohali, Turki Albaqami, Moaz Safwan Bourgleh\",\"doi\":\"10.5144/0256-4947.2025.112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ischemic stroke (IS) is a leading cause of disability and mortality, with fatal outcomes increased with recurrent strokes. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the safety and efficacy of high-dose statins for secondary IS prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was regestered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024574088). Cochrane methodology was followed in this review and comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrial.gov, to include all RCTs conducted from 2004 to 2024, comparing high-dose statins (simvastatin ≥40 mg, atorvastatin ≥40 mg, and rosuvastatin ≥20 mg) with low-dose statins, placebo, or standard care. Outcomes of this review were recurrent IS reduction and adverse events reported in RCTs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine RCTs involving 5,503 patients, with male patients ranging from 25.8% to 81.6% were included. Compared to controls, high-dose statins did not significantly reduce risks for secondary IS (OR 0.78, 95% CI [0.61, 1.00], <i>P</i>=.05) and hemorrhagic stroke (OR 0.85, 95% CI [0.56, 1.29], <i>P</i>=.45). Furthermore, no differences were observed in mortality rates and adverse events between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with high dose statins didn't reduce the risk of stroke recurrence or improve mortality, though further research is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Saudi medicine\",\"volume\":\"45 2\",\"pages\":\"112-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Saudi medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2025.112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Saudi medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2025.112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

缺血性脑卒中(IS)是致残和死亡的主要原因,致命的结果随着复发性脑卒中而增加。本系统综述和随机对照试验(rct)的荟萃分析评估了大剂量他汀类药物用于继发性IS预防的安全性和有效性。方法:本综述在PROSPERO注册(注册号:CRD42024574088)。本综述采用Cochrane方法学,并综合检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和clinicaltrials .gov,纳入2004年至2024年进行的所有rct,比较高剂量他汀类药物(辛伐他汀≥40mg、阿托伐他汀≥40mg和瑞舒伐他汀≥20mg)与低剂量他汀类药物、安慰剂或标准治疗。本综述的结果是rct中报告的复发性IS减少和不良事件。结果:纳入9项rct,共5503例患者,男性患者占25.8% ~ 81.6%。与对照组相比,高剂量他汀类药物并没有显著降低继发性IS (OR 0.78, 95% CI [0.61, 1.00], P= 0.05)和出血性卒中(OR 0.85, 95% CI [0.56, 1.29], P= 0.45)的风险。此外,两组之间的死亡率和不良事件没有观察到差异。结论:大剂量他汀类药物治疗并没有降低卒中复发风险或提高死亡率,但需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High-dose statins for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Introduction: Ischemic stroke (IS) is a leading cause of disability and mortality, with fatal outcomes increased with recurrent strokes. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the safety and efficacy of high-dose statins for secondary IS prevention.

Methods: This review was regestered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024574088). Cochrane methodology was followed in this review and comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrial.gov, to include all RCTs conducted from 2004 to 2024, comparing high-dose statins (simvastatin ≥40 mg, atorvastatin ≥40 mg, and rosuvastatin ≥20 mg) with low-dose statins, placebo, or standard care. Outcomes of this review were recurrent IS reduction and adverse events reported in RCTs.

Results: Nine RCTs involving 5,503 patients, with male patients ranging from 25.8% to 81.6% were included. Compared to controls, high-dose statins did not significantly reduce risks for secondary IS (OR 0.78, 95% CI [0.61, 1.00], P=.05) and hemorrhagic stroke (OR 0.85, 95% CI [0.56, 1.29], P=.45). Furthermore, no differences were observed in mortality rates and adverse events between groups.

Conclusion: Treatment with high dose statins didn't reduce the risk of stroke recurrence or improve mortality, though further research is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信