通过动态框架和根本的跨学科交叉分析重新定义康复研究:COVID-19后状态(PCC)疲劳研究方案

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Richard Levi, Ulrika Birberg Thornberg, Ida Blystad, Anestis Divanoglou, David Engblom, Felipe Leon, Sofia Morberg Jämterud, Kristin Zeiler
{"title":"通过动态框架和根本的跨学科交叉分析重新定义康复研究:COVID-19后状态(PCC)疲劳研究方案","authors":"Richard Levi, Ulrika Birberg Thornberg, Ida Blystad, Anestis Divanoglou, David Engblom, Felipe Leon, Sofia Morberg Jämterud, Kristin Zeiler","doi":"10.2340/jrm.v57.42254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present a radically interdisciplinary research approach to ill-defined symptoms, with a focus on fatigue as a major symptom of post COVID-19 condition, where multiple and, to date, rarely combined approaches may yield a fuller understanding of these symptoms.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Protocol for a mixed-methods study comprising an interdisciplinary cross-analysis.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>35 persons with post COVID-19 condition and severe fatigue were included, and 35 age-, sex-, and educationally matched controls who recovered from COVID-19 without post COVID-19 condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were assessed by a multidisciplinary research team as follows: physician assessment; blood and urinalysis; spirometry and physical performance tests; neuropsychological tests; structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging; extended immunological tests (cytokines); and qualitative phenomenological analysis of interviews. Data will be analysed in accordance with established methods in each of these research fields and by a cross-analysis methodology developed from within an enactive framework. This framework encompasses a focus on neuroscientific, physiological, and experiential aspects of the person as a living being in their sociocultural world.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The biopsychosocial model needs to be implemented in research according to methods that allow radically different research paradigms, typically seen as incommensurable, to inform each other in a non-reductionist manner. One application of such an approach is therefore described.</p>","PeriodicalId":54768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"57 ","pages":"jrm42254"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconceptualizing rehabilitation research via an enactive framework and a radically interdisciplinary cross-analysis: a study protocol on fatigue in post COVID-19 condition (PCC).\",\"authors\":\"Richard Levi, Ulrika Birberg Thornberg, Ida Blystad, Anestis Divanoglou, David Engblom, Felipe Leon, Sofia Morberg Jämterud, Kristin Zeiler\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/jrm.v57.42254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present a radically interdisciplinary research approach to ill-defined symptoms, with a focus on fatigue as a major symptom of post COVID-19 condition, where multiple and, to date, rarely combined approaches may yield a fuller understanding of these symptoms.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Protocol for a mixed-methods study comprising an interdisciplinary cross-analysis.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>35 persons with post COVID-19 condition and severe fatigue were included, and 35 age-, sex-, and educationally matched controls who recovered from COVID-19 without post COVID-19 condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were assessed by a multidisciplinary research team as follows: physician assessment; blood and urinalysis; spirometry and physical performance tests; neuropsychological tests; structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging; extended immunological tests (cytokines); and qualitative phenomenological analysis of interviews. Data will be analysed in accordance with established methods in each of these research fields and by a cross-analysis methodology developed from within an enactive framework. This framework encompasses a focus on neuroscientific, physiological, and experiential aspects of the person as a living being in their sociocultural world.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The biopsychosocial model needs to be implemented in research according to methods that allow radically different research paradigms, typically seen as incommensurable, to inform each other in a non-reductionist manner. One application of such an approach is therefore described.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"jrm42254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995433/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.42254\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.42254","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:提出一种完全跨学科的研究方法来研究不明确的症状,重点关注疲劳作为COVID-19后症状的主要症状,其中多种且迄今为止很少结合的方法可能会对这些症状产生更全面的理解。设计:包含跨学科交叉分析的混合方法研究方案。患者:包括35名患有COVID-19后症状和严重疲劳的患者,以及35名年龄、性别和教育程度相匹配的对照组,他们从COVID-19后症状中恢复过来,但没有COVID-19后症状。方法:由多学科研究小组对参与者进行如下评估:医师评估;血液和尿液分析;肺活量测定和体能测试;神经心理学测试;结构与功能磁共振成像;扩大免疫检查(细胞因子);访谈的定性现象学分析。数据将按照这些研究领域的既定方法进行分析,并采用在现行框架内制定的交叉分析方法。这个框架包含了对人在其社会文化世界中作为一个活生生的存在的神经科学、生理和经验方面的关注。结论:生物心理社会模型需要在研究中根据允许完全不同的研究范式的方法来实施,这些范式通常被视为不可通约的,以一种非简化的方式相互告知。因此,描述了这种方法的一种应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconceptualizing rehabilitation research via an enactive framework and a radically interdisciplinary cross-analysis: a study protocol on fatigue in post COVID-19 condition (PCC).

Objective: To present a radically interdisciplinary research approach to ill-defined symptoms, with a focus on fatigue as a major symptom of post COVID-19 condition, where multiple and, to date, rarely combined approaches may yield a fuller understanding of these symptoms.

Design: Protocol for a mixed-methods study comprising an interdisciplinary cross-analysis.

Patients: 35 persons with post COVID-19 condition and severe fatigue were included, and 35 age-, sex-, and educationally matched controls who recovered from COVID-19 without post COVID-19 condition.

Methods: Participants were assessed by a multidisciplinary research team as follows: physician assessment; blood and urinalysis; spirometry and physical performance tests; neuropsychological tests; structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging; extended immunological tests (cytokines); and qualitative phenomenological analysis of interviews. Data will be analysed in accordance with established methods in each of these research fields and by a cross-analysis methodology developed from within an enactive framework. This framework encompasses a focus on neuroscientific, physiological, and experiential aspects of the person as a living being in their sociocultural world.

Conclusion: The biopsychosocial model needs to be implemented in research according to methods that allow radically different research paradigms, typically seen as incommensurable, to inform each other in a non-reductionist manner. One application of such an approach is therefore described.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
102
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year. Original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports and letters to the editor are published, as also are editorials and book reviews. The journal strives to provide its readers with a variety of topics, including: functional assessment and intervention studies, clinical studies in various patient groups, methodology in physical and rehabilitation medicine, epidemiological studies on disabling conditions and reports on vocational and sociomedical aspects of rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信