了解公众对国家电子健康记录系统的信任:一项多国定性研究。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-04-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076251333576
Kimon Papadopoulos, Elske Ammenwerth, Guillaume Lame, Nina Stahl, Verena Struckmann, Viktor von Wyl, Felix Gille
{"title":"了解公众对国家电子健康记录系统的信任:一项多国定性研究。","authors":"Kimon Papadopoulos, Elske Ammenwerth, Guillaume Lame, Nina Stahl, Verena Struckmann, Viktor von Wyl, Felix Gille","doi":"10.1177/20552076251333576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Having public trust in national electronic health record systems (NEHRs) is crucial for the successful implementation and participation of NEHRs within a nations healthcare system. Yet, a lack of conceptual clarity precludes healthcare policymakers from incorporating trust to the fullest extent possible. In response, this study seeks to validate an existing framework for public trust in the healthcare system, which will help provide a clearer understanding of what constitutes public trust in NEHRs across members of the public in different countries, cultures, and contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four focus groups were conducted in Austria, Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands, and Switzerland with residents of each respective country to discuss their viewpoints on our public trust in NEHRs framework in order to validate said framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Frameworks describing the causes and effects of public trust in NEHRs were created for each country studied. Across all countries, the frameworks remained similar to our base framework, highlighting our frameworks' robustness. Data security, privacy, and autonomy were consistently described as the most important aspects of public trust in NEHRs. Concurrently, health system actors, such as doctors, were found to have significant influence on NEHR implementation. Their influence, however, can either be beneficial or detrimental to public trust in NEHRs, depending on their actions and how the public perceives those actions. Additional results detail contextual insights into country-specific viewpoints and the role of healthcare stakeholders in public trust in NEHRs. The results showcase the differences and similarities in which different populations across Europe view trust in NEHRs in the context of our framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings present public trust frameworks in the context of NEHRs for the study countries. These frameworks can assist stakeholders in obtaining a comprehensive understanding of the complexity of public trust in implementing and promoting their NEHRs, including measurements of public trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":"11 ","pages":"20552076251333576"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970066/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding public trust in national electronic health record systems: A multi-national qualitative research study.\",\"authors\":\"Kimon Papadopoulos, Elske Ammenwerth, Guillaume Lame, Nina Stahl, Verena Struckmann, Viktor von Wyl, Felix Gille\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20552076251333576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Having public trust in national electronic health record systems (NEHRs) is crucial for the successful implementation and participation of NEHRs within a nations healthcare system. Yet, a lack of conceptual clarity precludes healthcare policymakers from incorporating trust to the fullest extent possible. In response, this study seeks to validate an existing framework for public trust in the healthcare system, which will help provide a clearer understanding of what constitutes public trust in NEHRs across members of the public in different countries, cultures, and contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four focus groups were conducted in Austria, Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands, and Switzerland with residents of each respective country to discuss their viewpoints on our public trust in NEHRs framework in order to validate said framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Frameworks describing the causes and effects of public trust in NEHRs were created for each country studied. Across all countries, the frameworks remained similar to our base framework, highlighting our frameworks' robustness. Data security, privacy, and autonomy were consistently described as the most important aspects of public trust in NEHRs. Concurrently, health system actors, such as doctors, were found to have significant influence on NEHR implementation. Their influence, however, can either be beneficial or detrimental to public trust in NEHRs, depending on their actions and how the public perceives those actions. Additional results detail contextual insights into country-specific viewpoints and the role of healthcare stakeholders in public trust in NEHRs. The results showcase the differences and similarities in which different populations across Europe view trust in NEHRs in the context of our framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings present public trust frameworks in the context of NEHRs for the study countries. These frameworks can assist stakeholders in obtaining a comprehensive understanding of the complexity of public trust in implementing and promoting their NEHRs, including measurements of public trust.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"20552076251333576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970066/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251333576\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251333576","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:拥有公众对国家电子健康档案系统(nehr)的信任是成功实施和国家卫生保健系统内nehr参与的关键。然而,缺乏清晰的概念阻碍了医疗保健政策制定者将信任纳入最大可能的范围。作为回应,本研究试图验证现有的医疗保健系统公众信任框架,这将有助于更清楚地了解不同国家、文化和背景下公众对nehr的公众信任的构成。方法:在奥地利、德国、法国、意大利、荷兰和瑞士进行了24个焦点小组,每个国家的居民讨论他们对我们对nehr框架的公众信任的看法,以验证所述框架。结果:为每个被研究的国家创建了描述公众信任的原因和影响的框架。在所有国家,这些框架与我们的基本框架保持相似,突出了我们框架的稳健性。数据安全、隐私和自主权一直被描述为nehr中公众信任的最重要方面。同时,发现卫生系统行为者,如医生,对《新卫生政策》的实施具有重大影响。然而,它们的影响对公众对国家卫生机构的信任可能是有利的,也可能是有害的,这取决于它们的行动以及公众如何看待这些行动。其他结果详细介绍了国家特定观点的背景见解以及医疗保健利益相关者在nehr公众信任中的作用。结果显示了在我们的框架背景下,欧洲不同人群对nehr信任的差异和相似之处。结论:这些发现为研究国家提供了国家卫生报告背景下的公众信任框架。这些框架可以帮助利益相关者全面了解公众信任在实施和促进其nehr方面的复杂性,包括对公众信任的衡量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding public trust in national electronic health record systems: A multi-national qualitative research study.

Objective: Having public trust in national electronic health record systems (NEHRs) is crucial for the successful implementation and participation of NEHRs within a nations healthcare system. Yet, a lack of conceptual clarity precludes healthcare policymakers from incorporating trust to the fullest extent possible. In response, this study seeks to validate an existing framework for public trust in the healthcare system, which will help provide a clearer understanding of what constitutes public trust in NEHRs across members of the public in different countries, cultures, and contexts.

Methods: Twenty-four focus groups were conducted in Austria, Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands, and Switzerland with residents of each respective country to discuss their viewpoints on our public trust in NEHRs framework in order to validate said framework.

Results: Frameworks describing the causes and effects of public trust in NEHRs were created for each country studied. Across all countries, the frameworks remained similar to our base framework, highlighting our frameworks' robustness. Data security, privacy, and autonomy were consistently described as the most important aspects of public trust in NEHRs. Concurrently, health system actors, such as doctors, were found to have significant influence on NEHR implementation. Their influence, however, can either be beneficial or detrimental to public trust in NEHRs, depending on their actions and how the public perceives those actions. Additional results detail contextual insights into country-specific viewpoints and the role of healthcare stakeholders in public trust in NEHRs. The results showcase the differences and similarities in which different populations across Europe view trust in NEHRs in the context of our framework.

Conclusions: These findings present public trust frameworks in the context of NEHRs for the study countries. These frameworks can assist stakeholders in obtaining a comprehensive understanding of the complexity of public trust in implementing and promoting their NEHRs, including measurements of public trust.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信