{"title":"注射肉毒杆菌毒素治疗痔疮切除术后疼痛：随机临床试验的最新系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"R Quinn, G Jamsari, S Albayati","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03137-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Excisional haemorrhoidectomy remains the gold-standard treatment for grade III-IV haemorrhoids owing to the high success rate. However, post-operative pain management is an ongoing challenge. Botulinum toxin injection is thought to improve pain by targeting the internal anal sphincter spasm which occurs following haemorrhoidectomy. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the effects of concurrent botulinum toxin injection on post-haemorrhoidectomy pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of botulinum toxin injection compared with placebo for management of post-haemorrhoidectomy pain was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Outcomes assessed included daily post-operative pain scores assessed using an analogue scale (0-10), pain at first defecation, analgesia use, complication rates and time to return to work.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of seven RCTs assessing 340 patients who underwent an excisional haemorrhoidectomy were included. In total, seven studies (n = 340) found significant reduction in pain post-procedure with botulinum toxin use on day 1 (mean difference, MD -1.53; 95% confidence intervals, CI -2.12, -0.94; p < 0.00001), with similar findings on day 2 and 4 (MD -1.84, 95% CI -3.28, -0.41; p = 0.01 and MD -1.63, 95% CI -2.15, -1.09; p < 0.00001, respectively). However, the analgesic effects were not seen on subsequent analyses up to day 14. Botulinum toxin was seen to be safe, with no significant difference in faecal incontinence (MD 1.05, 95% CI 0.40, 2.75; p = 0.93) or urinary retention (MD 0.37, 95% CI 0.09, 1.53; p = 0.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Botulinum toxin use for pain relief post-excisional haemorrhoidectomy is safe and effective in the initial peri-operative period; however, the results were short-lived. Further, more robust randomised controlled trials are needed to strengthen these findings and determine the utility of botulinum toxin in this setting.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO Register for Systematic Reviews Registration Number - CRD42024541351 on April 29 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11976758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Botulinum toxin injection for management of post-haemorrhoidectomy pain: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"R Quinn, G Jamsari, S Albayati\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10151-025-03137-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Excisional haemorrhoidectomy remains the gold-standard treatment for grade III-IV haemorrhoids owing to the high success rate. However, post-operative pain management is an ongoing challenge. Botulinum toxin injection is thought to improve pain by targeting the internal anal sphincter spasm which occurs following haemorrhoidectomy. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the effects of concurrent botulinum toxin injection on post-haemorrhoidectomy pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of botulinum toxin injection compared with placebo for management of post-haemorrhoidectomy pain was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Outcomes assessed included daily post-operative pain scores assessed using an analogue scale (0-10), pain at first defecation, analgesia use, complication rates and time to return to work.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of seven RCTs assessing 340 patients who underwent an excisional haemorrhoidectomy were included. In total, seven studies (n = 340) found significant reduction in pain post-procedure with botulinum toxin use on day 1 (mean difference, MD -1.53; 95% confidence intervals, CI -2.12, -0.94; p < 0.00001), with similar findings on day 2 and 4 (MD -1.84, 95% CI -3.28, -0.41; p = 0.01 and MD -1.63, 95% CI -2.15, -1.09; p < 0.00001, respectively). However, the analgesic effects were not seen on subsequent analyses up to day 14. Botulinum toxin was seen to be safe, with no significant difference in faecal incontinence (MD 1.05, 95% CI 0.40, 2.75; p = 0.93) or urinary retention (MD 0.37, 95% CI 0.09, 1.53; p = 0.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Botulinum toxin use for pain relief post-excisional haemorrhoidectomy is safe and effective in the initial peri-operative period; however, the results were short-lived. Further, more robust randomised controlled trials are needed to strengthen these findings and determine the utility of botulinum toxin in this setting.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO Register for Systematic Reviews Registration Number - CRD42024541351 on April 29 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques in Coloproctology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11976758/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques in Coloproctology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-025-03137-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-025-03137-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Botulinum toxin injection for management of post-haemorrhoidectomy pain: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
Introduction: Excisional haemorrhoidectomy remains the gold-standard treatment for grade III-IV haemorrhoids owing to the high success rate. However, post-operative pain management is an ongoing challenge. Botulinum toxin injection is thought to improve pain by targeting the internal anal sphincter spasm which occurs following haemorrhoidectomy. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the effects of concurrent botulinum toxin injection on post-haemorrhoidectomy pain.
Methods: A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of botulinum toxin injection compared with placebo for management of post-haemorrhoidectomy pain was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Outcomes assessed included daily post-operative pain scores assessed using an analogue scale (0-10), pain at first defecation, analgesia use, complication rates and time to return to work.
Results: A total of seven RCTs assessing 340 patients who underwent an excisional haemorrhoidectomy were included. In total, seven studies (n = 340) found significant reduction in pain post-procedure with botulinum toxin use on day 1 (mean difference, MD -1.53; 95% confidence intervals, CI -2.12, -0.94; p < 0.00001), with similar findings on day 2 and 4 (MD -1.84, 95% CI -3.28, -0.41; p = 0.01 and MD -1.63, 95% CI -2.15, -1.09; p < 0.00001, respectively). However, the analgesic effects were not seen on subsequent analyses up to day 14. Botulinum toxin was seen to be safe, with no significant difference in faecal incontinence (MD 1.05, 95% CI 0.40, 2.75; p = 0.93) or urinary retention (MD 0.37, 95% CI 0.09, 1.53; p = 0.17).
Conclusions: Botulinum toxin use for pain relief post-excisional haemorrhoidectomy is safe and effective in the initial peri-operative period; however, the results were short-lived. Further, more robust randomised controlled trials are needed to strengthen these findings and determine the utility of botulinum toxin in this setting.
Trial registration: PROSPERO Register for Systematic Reviews Registration Number - CRD42024541351 on April 29 2024.
期刊介绍：
Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
