移位的胫骨远端骨骺骨折:短腿与长腿铸造-一项前瞻性研究。

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Rajvarun S Grewal, Brock T Kitchen, James D Bomar, Emily O Cidambi, Macy J Dexter, Eric W Edmonds, Maya E Pring, Vidyadhar V Upasani, C Douglas Wallace, Andrew Pennock
{"title":"移位的胫骨远端骨骺骨折:短腿与长腿铸造-一项前瞻性研究。","authors":"Rajvarun S Grewal, Brock T Kitchen, James D Bomar, Emily O Cidambi, Macy J Dexter, Eric W Edmonds, Maya E Pring, Vidyadhar V Upasani, C Douglas Wallace, Andrew Pennock","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal treatment of distal tibia physeal fractures in pediatric patients remains controversial. Traditionally, after a closed reduction is performed, a long leg cast (LLC) is used to provide rotational control and prevent loss of reduction. Recent retrospective data suggest that short leg casts (SLC) may be equally effective. This study compares outcomes of SLC versus LLC in treating these fractures in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled patients from a pediatric level I trauma center with displaced distal tibia physeal fractures requiring reduction. Ten surgeons declared their predetermined preference for either SLC (n=5) or LLC (n=5), and patients were treated based on the on-call surgeon's preference. Inclusion criteria included patients with open growth plates and distal tibia physeal fractures. Exclusion criteria included systemic bone disease, pathologic fractures, and open fractures. Patients underwent closed reduction and were immobilized in either SLC or LLC. Follow-up assessments included clinical evaluations, radiographs, and patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients participated, with a mean age of 12.5 years (mean follow-up of 9.4 mo). 17/40 were female. Twenty-four patients were treated with SLC and 16 with LLC. None of the fractures lost reduction. At 1 week, there were no significant differences in pain scores or satisfaction (P>0.19). At cast removal, the LLC group reported significantly higher pain scores compared with the SLC group (P=0.033), though satisfaction scores remained similar (P=0.786). At the final follow-up, all outcomes of interest were comparable between the 2 groups (P>0.09). Thirty-eight percent (15/40) of our cohort developed a premature physeal closure (PPC), 3 of which (20%) required subsequent surgery. There was no significant difference in the proportion of PPC among the SLC and LLC groups (P=0.495).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SLCs are effective in treating displaced distal tibia physeal fractures, with no increased risk of loss of reduction or premature physeal closure (PPC) compared with LLCs. Regardless of cast type, the risk of PPC is significant enough to require close follow-up.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II-prospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Displaced Distal Tibia Physeal Fractures: Short Leg Versus Long Leg Casting-A Prospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Rajvarun S Grewal, Brock T Kitchen, James D Bomar, Emily O Cidambi, Macy J Dexter, Eric W Edmonds, Maya E Pring, Vidyadhar V Upasani, C Douglas Wallace, Andrew Pennock\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal treatment of distal tibia physeal fractures in pediatric patients remains controversial. Traditionally, after a closed reduction is performed, a long leg cast (LLC) is used to provide rotational control and prevent loss of reduction. Recent retrospective data suggest that short leg casts (SLC) may be equally effective. This study compares outcomes of SLC versus LLC in treating these fractures in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled patients from a pediatric level I trauma center with displaced distal tibia physeal fractures requiring reduction. Ten surgeons declared their predetermined preference for either SLC (n=5) or LLC (n=5), and patients were treated based on the on-call surgeon's preference. Inclusion criteria included patients with open growth plates and distal tibia physeal fractures. Exclusion criteria included systemic bone disease, pathologic fractures, and open fractures. Patients underwent closed reduction and were immobilized in either SLC or LLC. Follow-up assessments included clinical evaluations, radiographs, and patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients participated, with a mean age of 12.5 years (mean follow-up of 9.4 mo). 17/40 were female. Twenty-four patients were treated with SLC and 16 with LLC. None of the fractures lost reduction. At 1 week, there were no significant differences in pain scores or satisfaction (P>0.19). At cast removal, the LLC group reported significantly higher pain scores compared with the SLC group (P=0.033), though satisfaction scores remained similar (P=0.786). At the final follow-up, all outcomes of interest were comparable between the 2 groups (P>0.09). Thirty-eight percent (15/40) of our cohort developed a premature physeal closure (PPC), 3 of which (20%) required subsequent surgery. There was no significant difference in the proportion of PPC among the SLC and LLC groups (P=0.495).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SLCs are effective in treating displaced distal tibia physeal fractures, with no increased risk of loss of reduction or premature physeal closure (PPC) compared with LLCs. Regardless of cast type, the risk of PPC is significant enough to require close follow-up.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II-prospective cohort study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002961\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002961","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:小儿胫骨远端骨骺骨折的最佳治疗方法仍有争议。传统上,在完成闭合复位后,使用长腿石膏(LLC)来提供旋转控制并防止复位丢失。最近的回顾性数据表明,短腿石膏(SLC)可能同样有效。本研究比较了SLC与LLC治疗小儿骨折的效果。方法:这项前瞻性研究纳入了来自儿科一级创伤中心的胫骨远端移位骨骺骨折需要复位的患者。10位外科医生声明了他们对SLC (n=5)或LLC (n=5)的预先偏好,患者根据随叫随到的外科医生的偏好进行治疗。纳入标准包括开放生长板和胫骨远端骨骺骨折的患者。排除标准包括全身性骨病、病理性骨折和开放性骨折。患者接受闭合复位并固定在SLC或LLC中。随访评估包括临床评估、x线片和患者报告的结果。结果:40例患者参与,平均年龄12.5岁(平均随访9.4个月)。其中17/40为女性。24例患者采用SLC治疗,16例采用LLC治疗。没有一例骨折失去复位。1周时,两组疼痛评分和满意度无显著差异(P < 0.19)。在拔石膏时,LLC组报告的疼痛评分明显高于SLC组(P=0.033),尽管满意度评分保持相似(P=0.786)。在最后随访时,两组间所有相关结果具有可比性(P < 0.05)。我们的队列中有38%(15/40)发生了骨骺过早闭合(PPC),其中3例(20%)需要后续手术。SLC组与LLC组PPC比例差异无统计学意义(P=0.495)。结论:SLCs在治疗移位的胫骨远端骨骺骨折中是有效的,与LLCs相比,SLCs没有增加复位丢失或骨骺过早闭合(PPC)的风险。无论铸造类型如何,PPC的风险都足够大,需要密切随访。证据等级:ii级前瞻性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Displaced Distal Tibia Physeal Fractures: Short Leg Versus Long Leg Casting-A Prospective Study.

Background: The optimal treatment of distal tibia physeal fractures in pediatric patients remains controversial. Traditionally, after a closed reduction is performed, a long leg cast (LLC) is used to provide rotational control and prevent loss of reduction. Recent retrospective data suggest that short leg casts (SLC) may be equally effective. This study compares outcomes of SLC versus LLC in treating these fractures in pediatric patients.

Methods: This prospective study enrolled patients from a pediatric level I trauma center with displaced distal tibia physeal fractures requiring reduction. Ten surgeons declared their predetermined preference for either SLC (n=5) or LLC (n=5), and patients were treated based on the on-call surgeon's preference. Inclusion criteria included patients with open growth plates and distal tibia physeal fractures. Exclusion criteria included systemic bone disease, pathologic fractures, and open fractures. Patients underwent closed reduction and were immobilized in either SLC or LLC. Follow-up assessments included clinical evaluations, radiographs, and patient-reported outcomes.

Results: Forty patients participated, with a mean age of 12.5 years (mean follow-up of 9.4 mo). 17/40 were female. Twenty-four patients were treated with SLC and 16 with LLC. None of the fractures lost reduction. At 1 week, there were no significant differences in pain scores or satisfaction (P>0.19). At cast removal, the LLC group reported significantly higher pain scores compared with the SLC group (P=0.033), though satisfaction scores remained similar (P=0.786). At the final follow-up, all outcomes of interest were comparable between the 2 groups (P>0.09). Thirty-eight percent (15/40) of our cohort developed a premature physeal closure (PPC), 3 of which (20%) required subsequent surgery. There was no significant difference in the proportion of PPC among the SLC and LLC groups (P=0.495).

Conclusion: SLCs are effective in treating displaced distal tibia physeal fractures, with no increased risk of loss of reduction or premature physeal closure (PPC) compared with LLCs. Regardless of cast type, the risk of PPC is significant enough to require close follow-up.

Level of evidence: Level II-prospective cohort study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信