揭穿神经迷思:职前教师对自闭症谱系障碍的见解

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Irene Lacruz-Pérez, Gemma Pastor-Cerezuela, Carlos Caurín-Alonso, Antonio José Morales-Hernández, Raúl Tárraga-Mínguez
{"title":"揭穿神经迷思:职前教师对自闭症谱系障碍的见解","authors":"Irene Lacruz-Pérez,&nbsp;Gemma Pastor-Cerezuela,&nbsp;Carlos Caurín-Alonso,&nbsp;Antonio José Morales-Hernández,&nbsp;Raúl Tárraga-Mínguez","doi":"10.1111/1471-3802.12733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Teachers' beliefs in certain neuromyths about neurodevelopmental disorders can negatively impact the educational inclusion of students who present them. This study aims to analyse the prevalence of neuromyths about the health and the emotional competences of people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in pre-service teachers; and to assess the possible contribution of university training to constructing accurate knowledge about autism. This prevalence was compared in three groups of pre-service teachers: 1st-year students, 4th-year students who will be regular teachers and 4th-year students training to be special education specialists. Additionally, it was proposed to identify the topic with the most myths (health or emotional competences) and the most frequent myths. A validated instrument was completed by 167 pre-service teachers. Overall, the 4th-year specialist group had more correct answers and fewer doubts that the 4th-year regular group, which had more correct answers than the 1st-year group. The prevalence of errors was not statistically different among the three groups. Moreover, participants answered more questions and made more errors about emotional competences in autism than about health. Among the most frequent myths are those concerning empathy or the cause of ASD. Based on these results, some implications for pre-service teacher education are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","volume":"25 2","pages":"403-415"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-3802.12733","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Debunking neuromyths: Pre-service teachers' insights on autism spectrum disorder\",\"authors\":\"Irene Lacruz-Pérez,&nbsp;Gemma Pastor-Cerezuela,&nbsp;Carlos Caurín-Alonso,&nbsp;Antonio José Morales-Hernández,&nbsp;Raúl Tárraga-Mínguez\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-3802.12733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Teachers' beliefs in certain neuromyths about neurodevelopmental disorders can negatively impact the educational inclusion of students who present them. This study aims to analyse the prevalence of neuromyths about the health and the emotional competences of people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in pre-service teachers; and to assess the possible contribution of university training to constructing accurate knowledge about autism. This prevalence was compared in three groups of pre-service teachers: 1st-year students, 4th-year students who will be regular teachers and 4th-year students training to be special education specialists. Additionally, it was proposed to identify the topic with the most myths (health or emotional competences) and the most frequent myths. A validated instrument was completed by 167 pre-service teachers. Overall, the 4th-year specialist group had more correct answers and fewer doubts that the 4th-year regular group, which had more correct answers than the 1st-year group. The prevalence of errors was not statistically different among the three groups. Moreover, participants answered more questions and made more errors about emotional competences in autism than about health. Among the most frequent myths are those concerning empathy or the cause of ASD. Based on these results, some implications for pre-service teacher education are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"403-415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-3802.12733\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-3802.12733\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-3802.12733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教师对某些关于神经发育障碍的神经神话的信仰会对呈现这些神话的学生的教育包容产生负面影响。本研究旨在分析职前教师中有关自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者健康和情绪能力的神经神话的流行情况;并评估大学培训对构建关于自闭症的准确知识的可能贡献。我们比较了三组职前教师的患病率:一年级学生、四年级将成为正规教师的学生和四年级将成为特殊教育专家的学生。此外,有人建议用最多的神话(健康或情感能力)和最常见的神话来确定主题。167名职前教师完成了一份经过验证的测试。总体而言,第4年专家组比第4年常规组有更多的正确答案和更少的怀疑,常规组比第1年组有更多的正确答案。三组间的错误发生率无统计学差异。此外,与健康相比,参与者回答了更多关于自闭症情绪能力的问题,犯了更多的错误。其中最常见的误解是关于同理心或自闭症的病因。在此基础上,对职前教师教育的启示进行了探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Debunking neuromyths: Pre-service teachers' insights on autism spectrum disorder

Teachers' beliefs in certain neuromyths about neurodevelopmental disorders can negatively impact the educational inclusion of students who present them. This study aims to analyse the prevalence of neuromyths about the health and the emotional competences of people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in pre-service teachers; and to assess the possible contribution of university training to constructing accurate knowledge about autism. This prevalence was compared in three groups of pre-service teachers: 1st-year students, 4th-year students who will be regular teachers and 4th-year students training to be special education specialists. Additionally, it was proposed to identify the topic with the most myths (health or emotional competences) and the most frequent myths. A validated instrument was completed by 167 pre-service teachers. Overall, the 4th-year specialist group had more correct answers and fewer doubts that the 4th-year regular group, which had more correct answers than the 1st-year group. The prevalence of errors was not statistically different among the three groups. Moreover, participants answered more questions and made more errors about emotional competences in autism than about health. Among the most frequent myths are those concerning empathy or the cause of ASD. Based on these results, some implications for pre-service teacher education are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs (JORSEN) is an established online forum for the dissemination of international research on special educational needs. JORSEN aims to: Publish original research, literature reviews and theoretical papers on meeting special educational needs Create an international forum for researchers to reflect on, and share ideas regarding, issues of particular importance to them such as methodology, research design and ethical issues Reach a wide multi-disciplinary national and international audience through online publication Authors are invited to submit reports of original research, reviews of research and scholarly papers on methodology, research design and ethical issues. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs will provide essential reading for those working in the special educational needs field wherever that work takes place around the world. It will be of particular interest to those working in: Research Teaching and learning support Policymaking Administration and supervision Educational psychology Advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信