特殊教育需要学生中教师感知和学生感知的师生关系类型特征及其与学生功能的关联:一项使用潜在剖面分析的横断面研究

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Sophie C. Alsem, Femke van den Brink, Christina Hoogendijk, Nouchka T. Tick
{"title":"特殊教育需要学生中教师感知和学生感知的师生关系类型特征及其与学生功能的关联:一项使用潜在剖面分析的横断面研究","authors":"Sophie C. Alsem,&nbsp;Femke van den Brink,&nbsp;Christina Hoogendijk,&nbsp;Nouchka T. Tick","doi":"10.1111/1471-3802.12732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>High-quality teacher–student relationships are related to a wide range of positive student outcomes, especially in students with special educational needs. To enable tailored support to help teachers engage in positive relationships with these students, it is important to identify and understand the different types of teacher–student relationships that can emerge in this context. Aims of this study were to identify distinct teacher–student relationship types in special education and characterize these in terms of students' gender, problem behaviour, underachievement and teacher-perceived supporting ability. We explored consensus regarding perceived relationship-quality across teachers and students. In a cross-sectional design, 27 upper elementary special education teachers participated with 340 students (66.8% boys; Mage = 10.83). A latent profile analysis based on teacher reports revealed five relationship types: a close (52.9%), moderate (25.3%), ambivalent (8.8%), distanced (7.4%) and conflicted (5.6%) relationship. Student reports revealed three relationship types: close (65.9%), moderate (25.0%) and conflicted (9.1%). A high-quality, close relationship type was associated with less student problem behaviour and lower teacher-perceived supporting ability than lower-quality relationship types. Teachers and students had different perspectives on their shared relationship. These findings advance our understanding of the complexity of the dyadic teacher–student relationship and may inform interventions to enhance relationship quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":46783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","volume":"25 2","pages":"388-402"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-3802.12732","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing teacher-perceived and student-perceived teacher–student relationship types and associations with student functioning in students with special educational needs: A cross-sectional study using latent profile analyses\",\"authors\":\"Sophie C. Alsem,&nbsp;Femke van den Brink,&nbsp;Christina Hoogendijk,&nbsp;Nouchka T. Tick\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-3802.12732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>High-quality teacher–student relationships are related to a wide range of positive student outcomes, especially in students with special educational needs. To enable tailored support to help teachers engage in positive relationships with these students, it is important to identify and understand the different types of teacher–student relationships that can emerge in this context. Aims of this study were to identify distinct teacher–student relationship types in special education and characterize these in terms of students' gender, problem behaviour, underachievement and teacher-perceived supporting ability. We explored consensus regarding perceived relationship-quality across teachers and students. In a cross-sectional design, 27 upper elementary special education teachers participated with 340 students (66.8% boys; Mage = 10.83). A latent profile analysis based on teacher reports revealed five relationship types: a close (52.9%), moderate (25.3%), ambivalent (8.8%), distanced (7.4%) and conflicted (5.6%) relationship. Student reports revealed three relationship types: close (65.9%), moderate (25.0%) and conflicted (9.1%). A high-quality, close relationship type was associated with less student problem behaviour and lower teacher-perceived supporting ability than lower-quality relationship types. Teachers and students had different perspectives on their shared relationship. These findings advance our understanding of the complexity of the dyadic teacher–student relationship and may inform interventions to enhance relationship quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"388-402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-3802.12732\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-3802.12732\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-3802.12732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高质量的师生关系与广泛的积极学生成果有关,特别是对有特殊教育需要的学生。为了提供量身定制的支持,帮助教师与这些学生建立积极的关系,重要的是要识别和理解在这种情况下可能出现的不同类型的师生关系。本研究的目的在于找出特殊教育中不同的师生关系类型,并以学生的性别、问题行为、成绩不佳和教师感知的支持能力来描述这些类型。我们探讨了教师和学生对感知关系质量的共识。在横断面设计中,27名小学高年级特殊教育教师参与340名学生(66.8%男生;法师= 10.83)。基于教师报告的潜在特征分析显示了五种关系类型:亲密(52.9%)、中度(25.3%)、矛盾(8.8%)、疏远(7.4%)和冲突(5.6%)关系。学生报告显示了三种关系类型:亲密(65.9%),适度(25.0%)和冲突(9.1%)。与低质量的关系类型相比,高质量的亲密关系类型与较少的学生问题行为和较低的教师感知支持能力相关。老师和学生对他们共同的关系有不同的看法。这些发现促进了我们对二元师生关系复杂性的理解,并可能为提高关系质量的干预提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Characterizing teacher-perceived and student-perceived teacher–student relationship types and associations with student functioning in students with special educational needs: A cross-sectional study using latent profile analyses

Characterizing teacher-perceived and student-perceived teacher–student relationship types and associations with student functioning in students with special educational needs: A cross-sectional study using latent profile analyses

High-quality teacher–student relationships are related to a wide range of positive student outcomes, especially in students with special educational needs. To enable tailored support to help teachers engage in positive relationships with these students, it is important to identify and understand the different types of teacher–student relationships that can emerge in this context. Aims of this study were to identify distinct teacher–student relationship types in special education and characterize these in terms of students' gender, problem behaviour, underachievement and teacher-perceived supporting ability. We explored consensus regarding perceived relationship-quality across teachers and students. In a cross-sectional design, 27 upper elementary special education teachers participated with 340 students (66.8% boys; Mage = 10.83). A latent profile analysis based on teacher reports revealed five relationship types: a close (52.9%), moderate (25.3%), ambivalent (8.8%), distanced (7.4%) and conflicted (5.6%) relationship. Student reports revealed three relationship types: close (65.9%), moderate (25.0%) and conflicted (9.1%). A high-quality, close relationship type was associated with less student problem behaviour and lower teacher-perceived supporting ability than lower-quality relationship types. Teachers and students had different perspectives on their shared relationship. These findings advance our understanding of the complexity of the dyadic teacher–student relationship and may inform interventions to enhance relationship quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs (JORSEN) is an established online forum for the dissemination of international research on special educational needs. JORSEN aims to: Publish original research, literature reviews and theoretical papers on meeting special educational needs Create an international forum for researchers to reflect on, and share ideas regarding, issues of particular importance to them such as methodology, research design and ethical issues Reach a wide multi-disciplinary national and international audience through online publication Authors are invited to submit reports of original research, reviews of research and scholarly papers on methodology, research design and ethical issues. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs will provide essential reading for those working in the special educational needs field wherever that work takes place around the world. It will be of particular interest to those working in: Research Teaching and learning support Policymaking Administration and supervision Educational psychology Advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信