气候融资的专家认识论:重新审视非政治化批判

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Antipode Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1111/anti.70002
Jonathan Barnes
{"title":"气候融资的专家认识论:重新审视非政治化批判","authors":"Jonathan Barnes","doi":"10.1111/anti.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The response to climate change is orchestrated by international organisations, reflecting the global challenge and collaborative response. There is an established critique that this process is depoliticised—where institutions, policies, and practices foreclose contestation. This paper explores the downstream effects of this, where global knowledge practices intersect with national climate change planning. I nuance the concept of depoliticisation, drawing on the South African experience with the Green Climate Fund. I argue that there is an urgency framing, underlaid by scientific and financial rationales, which is willingly enacted by domestic actors. This limits the scope and participation in climate finance, empowering unevenly, rather than voiding politics. These effects are demonstrated by bringing together the depoliticisation literature with civic epistemology, to clarify how the epistemic geography of climate change in South Africa formulates, contests, and deploys knowledge. Re-politicisation is evident within the limits of urgency which is missed in depoliticisation literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":8241,"journal":{"name":"Antipode","volume":"57 3","pages":"808-829"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anti.70002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Expert Epistemology of Climate Finance: Re-Visiting the Depoliticisation Critique\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Barnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/anti.70002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The response to climate change is orchestrated by international organisations, reflecting the global challenge and collaborative response. There is an established critique that this process is depoliticised—where institutions, policies, and practices foreclose contestation. This paper explores the downstream effects of this, where global knowledge practices intersect with national climate change planning. I nuance the concept of depoliticisation, drawing on the South African experience with the Green Climate Fund. I argue that there is an urgency framing, underlaid by scientific and financial rationales, which is willingly enacted by domestic actors. This limits the scope and participation in climate finance, empowering unevenly, rather than voiding politics. These effects are demonstrated by bringing together the depoliticisation literature with civic epistemology, to clarify how the epistemic geography of climate change in South Africa formulates, contests, and deploys knowledge. Re-politicisation is evident within the limits of urgency which is missed in depoliticisation literature.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antipode\",\"volume\":\"57 3\",\"pages\":\"808-829\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anti.70002\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antipode\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anti.70002\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antipode","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anti.70002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

应对气候变化是由国际组织精心策划的,反映了全球挑战和合作应对。有一种既定的批评认为,这一过程是非政治化的——制度、政策和实践排除了争论。本文探讨了全球知识实践与国家气候变化规划交叉的下游影响。我借鉴南非绿色气候基金的经验,对去政治化的概念进行了细微的区分。我认为,有一种紧迫性框架,以科学和金融理由为基础,由国内行动者自愿实施。这限制了气候融资的范围和参与,权力分配不均衡,而不是政治无效。这些影响是通过将非政治化文献与公民认识论结合在一起来证明的,以阐明南非气候变化的认识论地理如何制定、竞争和部署知识。在紧迫的范围内,再政治化是显而易见的,这在非政治化文学中是缺失的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Expert Epistemology of Climate Finance: Re-Visiting the Depoliticisation Critique

The response to climate change is orchestrated by international organisations, reflecting the global challenge and collaborative response. There is an established critique that this process is depoliticised—where institutions, policies, and practices foreclose contestation. This paper explores the downstream effects of this, where global knowledge practices intersect with national climate change planning. I nuance the concept of depoliticisation, drawing on the South African experience with the Green Climate Fund. I argue that there is an urgency framing, underlaid by scientific and financial rationales, which is willingly enacted by domestic actors. This limits the scope and participation in climate finance, empowering unevenly, rather than voiding politics. These effects are demonstrated by bringing together the depoliticisation literature with civic epistemology, to clarify how the epistemic geography of climate change in South Africa formulates, contests, and deploys knowledge. Re-politicisation is evident within the limits of urgency which is missed in depoliticisation literature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antipode
Antipode GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Antipode has published dissenting scholarship that explores and utilizes key geographical ideas like space, scale, place, borders and landscape. It aims to challenge dominant and orthodox views of the world through debate, scholarship and politically-committed research, creating new spaces and envisioning new futures. Antipode welcomes the infusion of new ideas and the shaking up of old positions, without being committed to just one view of radical analysis or politics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信