全自动和完全验证的高通量LC-MS/MS分析方法用于分析口服液中的多种滥用药物,采用新颖的样品制备和色谱条件

IF 2 3区 化学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Joakim Tan, Alexia Rylski, Anders Bergqvist, Niclas Nikolai Stephanson
{"title":"全自动和完全验证的高通量LC-MS/MS分析方法用于分析口服液中的多种滥用药物,采用新颖的样品制备和色谱条件","authors":"Joakim Tan,&nbsp;Alexia Rylski,&nbsp;Anders Bergqvist,&nbsp;Niclas Nikolai Stephanson","doi":"10.1002/jms.5132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Oral fluid sampling offers advantages over other biological matrices, mainly due to its noninvasive procedure avoiding privacy intrusion. The fully automated sample preparation procedure is based on salting-out assisted liquid–liquid extraction (SALLE) combined with high-efficiency LC-MS/MS methods for both screening and confirmation of 37 drugs and incorporates novel features enabling direct injection of acetonitrile extracts into an innovative chromatographic system. The methods' drug panel includes opioids, benzodiazepines, benzodiazepine-like drugs, cannabinoids, and stimulants. A full method validation was performed using OF/buffer from Greiner Bio-ONE International and Quantisal saliva collection devices. The validation included assessments of linearity, sensitivity, precision, accuracy, extraction recovery, matrix effects, process efficiency, stability, and carryover. All compounds demonstrated linearity across the concentration range 1–25 ng/mL, with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.99. Both methods' limit of detection ranged between 0.001 and 0.03 ng/mL, and the limit of quantification ranged between 0.02 and 0.09 ng/mL. Precision was ≤ 14.8% for screening and ≤ 8.5% for the confirmation method. Accuracy was ± 13.6% for screening and ± 8.7% (except at 0.5 and 1 ng/mL, where it was ± 25.3% and ± 17.6%, respectively) for the confirmation method. Extraction recoveries ranged from 40.0% to 95.1%, except for hydromorphone (27.4%) and morphine (34.4%). Although matrix effects were observed for a large number of compounds to varying degrees, they were largely compensated for by the use of deuterium- and <sup>13</sup>C-labeled internal standards (IS). IS-corrected overall process efficiency ranged from 100.7% to 119.1% with precision (CV%) ≤ 10.8% for all compounds. Spiked calibrators and QC samples in OF were stable in autosampler for up to 72 h and in the freezer for 3 days. Methanol working solutions were stable for 6 months. No significant carryover was observed. The methods have been successfully implemented in the routine analysis of approximately &gt; 1000 samples per month since March 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":16178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry","volume":"60 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jms.5132","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated and Fully Validated High-Throughput LC-MS/MS Assay for Analyzing Multiple Drugs of Abuse in Oral Fluids Using Novel Features in Sample Preparation and Chromatographic Conditions\",\"authors\":\"Joakim Tan,&nbsp;Alexia Rylski,&nbsp;Anders Bergqvist,&nbsp;Niclas Nikolai Stephanson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jms.5132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Oral fluid sampling offers advantages over other biological matrices, mainly due to its noninvasive procedure avoiding privacy intrusion. The fully automated sample preparation procedure is based on salting-out assisted liquid–liquid extraction (SALLE) combined with high-efficiency LC-MS/MS methods for both screening and confirmation of 37 drugs and incorporates novel features enabling direct injection of acetonitrile extracts into an innovative chromatographic system. The methods' drug panel includes opioids, benzodiazepines, benzodiazepine-like drugs, cannabinoids, and stimulants. A full method validation was performed using OF/buffer from Greiner Bio-ONE International and Quantisal saliva collection devices. The validation included assessments of linearity, sensitivity, precision, accuracy, extraction recovery, matrix effects, process efficiency, stability, and carryover. All compounds demonstrated linearity across the concentration range 1–25 ng/mL, with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.99. Both methods' limit of detection ranged between 0.001 and 0.03 ng/mL, and the limit of quantification ranged between 0.02 and 0.09 ng/mL. Precision was ≤ 14.8% for screening and ≤ 8.5% for the confirmation method. Accuracy was ± 13.6% for screening and ± 8.7% (except at 0.5 and 1 ng/mL, where it was ± 25.3% and ± 17.6%, respectively) for the confirmation method. Extraction recoveries ranged from 40.0% to 95.1%, except for hydromorphone (27.4%) and morphine (34.4%). Although matrix effects were observed for a large number of compounds to varying degrees, they were largely compensated for by the use of deuterium- and <sup>13</sup>C-labeled internal standards (IS). IS-corrected overall process efficiency ranged from 100.7% to 119.1% with precision (CV%) ≤ 10.8% for all compounds. Spiked calibrators and QC samples in OF were stable in autosampler for up to 72 h and in the freezer for 3 days. Methanol working solutions were stable for 6 months. No significant carryover was observed. The methods have been successfully implemented in the routine analysis of approximately &gt; 1000 samples per month since March 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mass Spectrometry\",\"volume\":\"60 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jms.5132\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mass Spectrometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jms.5132\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jms.5132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与其他生物基质相比,口腔液体取样具有优势,主要是由于其非侵入性程序避免了隐私侵犯。全自动样品制备程序基于盐析辅助液-液萃取(SALLE),结合高效LC-MS/MS方法对37种药物进行筛选和确认,并结合新功能,使乙腈提取物直接注射到创新的色谱系统中。该方法的药物小组包括阿片类药物、苯二氮卓类药物、苯二氮卓类药物、大麻素和兴奋剂。使用来自Greiner Bio-ONE国际公司的OF/缓冲液和Quantisal唾液收集设备进行完整的方法验证。验证包括线性、灵敏度、精密度、准确度、萃取回收率、基质效应、工艺效率、稳定性和结转性的评估。所有化合物在1 ~ 25 ng/mL浓度范围内均呈线性,R2≥0.99。两种方法的检出限为0.001 ~ 0.03 ng/mL,定量限为0.02 ~ 0.09 ng/mL。筛选法精密度≤14.8%,确证法精密度≤8.5%。筛选法的准确度为±13.6%,确认法的准确度为±8.7%(0.5和1 ng/mL除外,分别为±25.3%和±17.6%)。除氢吗啡酮(27.4%)和吗啡(34.4%)外,提取回收率为40.0% ~ 95.1%。虽然在许多化合物中观察到不同程度的基质效应,但它们在很大程度上通过使用氘和13c标记的内标物(IS)来补偿。所有化合物经is校正后的总体工艺效率范围为100.7%至119.1%,精密度(CV%)≤10.8%。加标校准器和OF中的QC样品在自动进样器中可稳定72小时,在冰箱中可稳定3天。甲醇工作液稳定6个月。未观察到明显的结转。自2024年3月以来,该方法已成功应用于每月约1000个样品的常规分析中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Automated and Fully Validated High-Throughput LC-MS/MS Assay for Analyzing Multiple Drugs of Abuse in Oral Fluids Using Novel Features in Sample Preparation and Chromatographic Conditions

Automated and Fully Validated High-Throughput LC-MS/MS Assay for Analyzing Multiple Drugs of Abuse in Oral Fluids Using Novel Features in Sample Preparation and Chromatographic Conditions

Oral fluid sampling offers advantages over other biological matrices, mainly due to its noninvasive procedure avoiding privacy intrusion. The fully automated sample preparation procedure is based on salting-out assisted liquid–liquid extraction (SALLE) combined with high-efficiency LC-MS/MS methods for both screening and confirmation of 37 drugs and incorporates novel features enabling direct injection of acetonitrile extracts into an innovative chromatographic system. The methods' drug panel includes opioids, benzodiazepines, benzodiazepine-like drugs, cannabinoids, and stimulants. A full method validation was performed using OF/buffer from Greiner Bio-ONE International and Quantisal saliva collection devices. The validation included assessments of linearity, sensitivity, precision, accuracy, extraction recovery, matrix effects, process efficiency, stability, and carryover. All compounds demonstrated linearity across the concentration range 1–25 ng/mL, with R2 ≥ 0.99. Both methods' limit of detection ranged between 0.001 and 0.03 ng/mL, and the limit of quantification ranged between 0.02 and 0.09 ng/mL. Precision was ≤ 14.8% for screening and ≤ 8.5% for the confirmation method. Accuracy was ± 13.6% for screening and ± 8.7% (except at 0.5 and 1 ng/mL, where it was ± 25.3% and ± 17.6%, respectively) for the confirmation method. Extraction recoveries ranged from 40.0% to 95.1%, except for hydromorphone (27.4%) and morphine (34.4%). Although matrix effects were observed for a large number of compounds to varying degrees, they were largely compensated for by the use of deuterium- and 13C-labeled internal standards (IS). IS-corrected overall process efficiency ranged from 100.7% to 119.1% with precision (CV%) ≤ 10.8% for all compounds. Spiked calibrators and QC samples in OF were stable in autosampler for up to 72 h and in the freezer for 3 days. Methanol working solutions were stable for 6 months. No significant carryover was observed. The methods have been successfully implemented in the routine analysis of approximately > 1000 samples per month since March 2024.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mass Spectrometry
Journal of Mass Spectrometry 化学-光谱学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mass Spectrometry publishes papers on a broad range of topics of interest to scientists working in both fundamental and applied areas involving the study of gaseous ions. The aim of JMS is to serve the scientific community with information provided and arranged to help senior investigators to better stay abreast of new discoveries and studies in their own field, to make them aware of events and developments in associated fields, and to provide students and newcomers the basic tools with which to learn fundamental and applied aspects of mass spectrometry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信