Qin Li , Yonghai Wang , Yihui Weng , Zhenfeng Wang , Yunchuan Wu , Mengyu Wang , Pan Yan , Linsen Zhang , Wei Su
{"title":"不同气体模型下低焓高超声速双楔流稳定相互作用的数值研究","authors":"Qin Li , Yonghai Wang , Yihui Weng , Zhenfeng Wang , Yunchuan Wu , Mengyu Wang , Pan Yan , Linsen Zhang , Wei Su","doi":"10.1016/j.ast.2025.110171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Numerical investigations and analyses are carried out on the interactions of low enthalpy hypersonic 30–55° double wedge configuration, particularly focusing on steady cases at conditions similar to the experimental setup by Swantek & Austin [AIAA 2012–284], with <span><math><mrow><mi>M</mi><mi>a</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>7</mn></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>h</mi><mn>0</mn></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>2.1</mn><mi>M</mi><mi>J</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>k</mi><mi>g</mi></mrow></math></span>. To achieve a steady solution, Reynolds numbers (<span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></math></span>) lower than those in the experiment are used. For increased accuracy, a third-order scheme <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mtext>WENO</mtext><mn>3</mn><mo>−</mo><mtext>PRM</mtext></mrow><mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>,</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></mrow><mn>2</mn></msubsup></math></span> [Li et al., J. Sci. Comput., 88(3) (2021) 75–130] with improved resolution is employed. Meanwhile, three gas models, i.e., the perfect, equilibrium, and non-equilibrium gas models, are used to analyze the difference potentials that arise from the physical model. After validating the methods, grid convergence studies are first conducted at <span><math><mrow><mi>M</mi><mi>a</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>7</mn></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>2.5</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mn>5</mn></msup><mo>/</mo><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span>, to determine the appropriate grid resolution for the main computations. Subsequently, comprehensive numerical studies are carried out on the steady interactions and their evolution at <span><math><mrow><mi>M</mi><mi>a</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>7</mn></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>h</mi><mn>0</mn></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>2.1</mn><mi>M</mi><mi>J</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>k</mi><mi>g</mi></mrow></math></span>. Specifically: (a) The upper limits of <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></math></span> are identified where the flows remain steady with the transmitted shock impinging on the aft wedge, and the corresponding interaction characteristics as well as differences in the three gas models are investigated qualitatively and quantitatively, e.g., the shock system, vortex structures, distributions such as pressure, Mach number, and specific heat ratio. Notably, a quasi-normal shock wave is observed within the slip line passage in the case of the perfect gas model. (b) The flow characteristics of the three models, including the interaction pattern, geometric features of triple points, impingements, and separation zone, are studied and compared for <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>4</mn><mo>,</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>3</mn><mo>,</mo><mrow><mspace></mspace><mtext>and</mtext><mspace></mspace></mrow><mn>2</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mn>4</mn></msup><mo>/</mo><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span>. Differences primarily emerge between the results of the perfect gas model and the real gas models. Specifically, a transmitted shock reflecting above the separation zone is observed in the case of the perfect gas model. The effect of the gas model on temperature and specific heat ratio distributions, as well as the heat transfer and pressure coefficients over the wedge surface are investigated. For an in-depth understanding, the shock polar method is applied for comparison with computational results, while a 1D flow model is proposed to explain the occurrence of the quasi-normal shock wave. Consequently, overall reasonable agreements are achieved. Finally, the effects of variations in Mach number and enthalpy are determined, by alternatively varying the two parameters around <span><math><mrow><mi>M</mi><mi>a</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>7</mn></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>h</mi><mn>0</mn></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>2.1</mn><mi>M</mi><mi>J</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>k</mi><mi>g</mi></mrow></math></span> at <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>4</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mn>4</mn></msup><mo>/</mo><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span>, focusing on alterations in interaction characteristics, thermodynamic properties, and aerodynamic performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50955,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace Science and Technology","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 110171"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical studies on steady interaction of low enthalpy hypersonic double wedge flows using different gas models\",\"authors\":\"Qin Li , Yonghai Wang , Yihui Weng , Zhenfeng Wang , Yunchuan Wu , Mengyu Wang , Pan Yan , Linsen Zhang , Wei Su\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ast.2025.110171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Numerical investigations and analyses are carried out on the interactions of low enthalpy hypersonic 30–55° double wedge configuration, particularly focusing on steady cases at conditions similar to the experimental setup by Swantek & Austin [AIAA 2012–284], with <span><math><mrow><mi>M</mi><mi>a</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>7</mn></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>h</mi><mn>0</mn></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>2.1</mn><mi>M</mi><mi>J</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>k</mi><mi>g</mi></mrow></math></span>. To achieve a steady solution, Reynolds numbers (<span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></math></span>) lower than those in the experiment are used. For increased accuracy, a third-order scheme <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mtext>WENO</mtext><mn>3</mn><mo>−</mo><mtext>PRM</mtext></mrow><mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>,</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></mrow><mn>2</mn></msubsup></math></span> [Li et al., J. Sci. Comput., 88(3) (2021) 75–130] with improved resolution is employed. Meanwhile, three gas models, i.e., the perfect, equilibrium, and non-equilibrium gas models, are used to analyze the difference potentials that arise from the physical model. After validating the methods, grid convergence studies are first conducted at <span><math><mrow><mi>M</mi><mi>a</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>7</mn></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>2.5</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mn>5</mn></msup><mo>/</mo><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span>, to determine the appropriate grid resolution for the main computations. Subsequently, comprehensive numerical studies are carried out on the steady interactions and their evolution at <span><math><mrow><mi>M</mi><mi>a</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>7</mn></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>h</mi><mn>0</mn></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>2.1</mn><mi>M</mi><mi>J</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>k</mi><mi>g</mi></mrow></math></span>. Specifically: (a) The upper limits of <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></math></span> are identified where the flows remain steady with the transmitted shock impinging on the aft wedge, and the corresponding interaction characteristics as well as differences in the three gas models are investigated qualitatively and quantitatively, e.g., the shock system, vortex structures, distributions such as pressure, Mach number, and specific heat ratio. Notably, a quasi-normal shock wave is observed within the slip line passage in the case of the perfect gas model. (b) The flow characteristics of the three models, including the interaction pattern, geometric features of triple points, impingements, and separation zone, are studied and compared for <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>4</mn><mo>,</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>3</mn><mo>,</mo><mrow><mspace></mspace><mtext>and</mtext><mspace></mspace></mrow><mn>2</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mn>4</mn></msup><mo>/</mo><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span>. Differences primarily emerge between the results of the perfect gas model and the real gas models. Specifically, a transmitted shock reflecting above the separation zone is observed in the case of the perfect gas model. The effect of the gas model on temperature and specific heat ratio distributions, as well as the heat transfer and pressure coefficients over the wedge surface are investigated. For an in-depth understanding, the shock polar method is applied for comparison with computational results, while a 1D flow model is proposed to explain the occurrence of the quasi-normal shock wave. Consequently, overall reasonable agreements are achieved. Finally, the effects of variations in Mach number and enthalpy are determined, by alternatively varying the two parameters around <span><math><mrow><mi>M</mi><mi>a</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>7</mn></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>h</mi><mn>0</mn></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>2.1</mn><mi>M</mi><mi>J</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>k</mi><mi>g</mi></mrow></math></span> at <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>4</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mn>4</mn></msup><mo>/</mo><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span>, focusing on alterations in interaction characteristics, thermodynamic properties, and aerodynamic performance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aerospace Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aerospace Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1270963825002421\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1270963825002421","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
对低焓高超声速30-55°双楔结构的相互作用进行了数值研究和分析,特别关注了与Swantek &;Austin [AIAA 2012-284], Ma=7, h0=2.1MJ/kg。为了得到稳定的溶液,采用了比实验低的雷诺数(Re)。为了提高精度,一种三阶格式WENO3−PRM1,12 [Li et et, J. Sci.]第一版。, 88(3)(2021) 75-130],采用改进的分辨率。同时,采用理想气体模型、平衡气体模型和非平衡气体模型对物理模型产生的差势进行了分析。在验证方法后,首先在Ma=7和Re=2.5×105/m处进行网格收敛研究,以确定适合主要计算的网格分辨率。随后,对Ma=7和h0=2.1MJ/kg时的稳态相互作用及其演化进行了全面的数值研究。具体而言:(a)确定了在传递激波冲击尾楔时流动保持稳定的Re上限,并定性和定量地研究了激波系统、涡结构、压力、马赫数、比热比等分布等三种气体模型的相互作用特征和差异。值得注意的是,在完美气体模型的情况下,在滑移线通道内观察到准正态激波。(b)在Re=4,3,and2×104/m时,研究比较了三种模型的流动特性,包括相互作用模式、三相点几何特征、冲击和分离带。差异主要出现在理想气体模型和实际气体模型的结果之间。具体地说,在理想气体模型的情况下,观察到反射在分离区上方的透射激波。研究了气体模型对楔形表面温度和比热比分布以及传热和压力系数的影响。为了更深入的理解,我们采用激波极坐标法与计算结果进行对比,同时提出一维流动模型来解释准正态激波的发生。因此,达成了总体合理的协议。最后,通过在Re=4×104/m时在Ma=7和h0=2.1MJ/kg附近交替改变这两个参数,确定马赫数和焓变化的影响,重点关注相互作用特性、热力学性质和气动性能的变化。
Numerical studies on steady interaction of low enthalpy hypersonic double wedge flows using different gas models
Numerical investigations and analyses are carried out on the interactions of low enthalpy hypersonic 30–55° double wedge configuration, particularly focusing on steady cases at conditions similar to the experimental setup by Swantek & Austin [AIAA 2012–284], with and . To achieve a steady solution, Reynolds numbers () lower than those in the experiment are used. For increased accuracy, a third-order scheme [Li et al., J. Sci. Comput., 88(3) (2021) 75–130] with improved resolution is employed. Meanwhile, three gas models, i.e., the perfect, equilibrium, and non-equilibrium gas models, are used to analyze the difference potentials that arise from the physical model. After validating the methods, grid convergence studies are first conducted at and , to determine the appropriate grid resolution for the main computations. Subsequently, comprehensive numerical studies are carried out on the steady interactions and their evolution at and . Specifically: (a) The upper limits of are identified where the flows remain steady with the transmitted shock impinging on the aft wedge, and the corresponding interaction characteristics as well as differences in the three gas models are investigated qualitatively and quantitatively, e.g., the shock system, vortex structures, distributions such as pressure, Mach number, and specific heat ratio. Notably, a quasi-normal shock wave is observed within the slip line passage in the case of the perfect gas model. (b) The flow characteristics of the three models, including the interaction pattern, geometric features of triple points, impingements, and separation zone, are studied and compared for . Differences primarily emerge between the results of the perfect gas model and the real gas models. Specifically, a transmitted shock reflecting above the separation zone is observed in the case of the perfect gas model. The effect of the gas model on temperature and specific heat ratio distributions, as well as the heat transfer and pressure coefficients over the wedge surface are investigated. For an in-depth understanding, the shock polar method is applied for comparison with computational results, while a 1D flow model is proposed to explain the occurrence of the quasi-normal shock wave. Consequently, overall reasonable agreements are achieved. Finally, the effects of variations in Mach number and enthalpy are determined, by alternatively varying the two parameters around and at , focusing on alterations in interaction characteristics, thermodynamic properties, and aerodynamic performance.
期刊介绍:
Aerospace Science and Technology publishes articles of outstanding scientific quality. Each article is reviewed by two referees. The journal welcomes papers from a wide range of countries. This journal publishes original papers, review articles and short communications related to all fields of aerospace research, fundamental and applied, potential applications of which are clearly related to:
• The design and the manufacture of aircraft, helicopters, missiles, launchers and satellites
• The control of their environment
• The study of various systems they are involved in, as supports or as targets.
Authors are invited to submit papers on new advances in the following topics to aerospace applications:
• Fluid dynamics
• Energetics and propulsion
• Materials and structures
• Flight mechanics
• Navigation, guidance and control
• Acoustics
• Optics
• Electromagnetism and radar
• Signal and image processing
• Information processing
• Data fusion
• Decision aid
• Human behaviour
• Robotics and intelligent systems
• Complex system engineering.
Etc.