随叫随到的放射科住院医师初步报告主要差异:一项荟萃分析

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Kathryn A. Szymanski BS , An T. Hoang BS , Dane Van Tassel MD , Paul Kang MS, MPH , Cory M. Pfeifer MD, MBA, MPH, MS
{"title":"随叫随到的放射科住院医师初步报告主要差异:一项荟萃分析","authors":"Kathryn A. Szymanski BS ,&nbsp;An T. Hoang BS ,&nbsp;Dane Van Tassel MD ,&nbsp;Paul Kang MS, MPH ,&nbsp;Cory M. Pfeifer MD, MBA, MPH, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.01.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>Throughout their training, radiology residents frequently perform independent overnight call, with attendings overreading reports the following morning. Call shifts are a fundamental part of radiology resident training, offering independence that can improve decision-making skills and professional confidence. However, because errors have the potential to affect patient care, analysis of clinically significant errors is critical. This meta-analysis was performed to organize existing data on on-call resident preliminary report discrepancy rates and to compare rates across modalities and resident years.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A PubMed search was performed in August 2024 using (\"resident report discrepancy\" OR (\"resident\" AND \"error\") OR \"preliminary\") AND \"radiology\" AND \"call”. Articles were included if they met the criteria, and relevant information was collected. Statistical analysis was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The PubMed search resulted in 107 articles, of which 20 met inclusion criteria. These studies included 616,918 preliminary reports. Pooled preliminary report major discrepancy rate (%) by modality was 0.64 for radiographs, 0.38 for US, 1.35 for CT, and 1.86 for MRI and by resident year was 1.27 for R1s, 1.05 for R2s, 0.88 for R3s, and 0.67 for R4s. The highest discrepancy rate was seen for R1s reading MRI (8.70%). The majority of papers included describe residents taking independent call, with only three having fellow or attending supervised call part of the time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Radiology residents are valuable members of the healthcare team and demonstrate high accuracy during independent call shifts. Fellow or attending real-time supervision can shorten the time to final report, and whether a hospital implements this should be decided by analyzing its individual system. This analysis is limited by variability in the classification of major discrepancies and inability to further classify data by body region scanned. In light of this, we encourage standardization in future reporting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"32 4","pages":"Pages 2342-2356"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On-Call Radiology Resident Preliminary Report Major Discrepancies: A Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn A. Szymanski BS ,&nbsp;An T. Hoang BS ,&nbsp;Dane Van Tassel MD ,&nbsp;Paul Kang MS, MPH ,&nbsp;Cory M. Pfeifer MD, MBA, MPH, MS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acra.2025.01.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>Throughout their training, radiology residents frequently perform independent overnight call, with attendings overreading reports the following morning. Call shifts are a fundamental part of radiology resident training, offering independence that can improve decision-making skills and professional confidence. However, because errors have the potential to affect patient care, analysis of clinically significant errors is critical. This meta-analysis was performed to organize existing data on on-call resident preliminary report discrepancy rates and to compare rates across modalities and resident years.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A PubMed search was performed in August 2024 using (\\\"resident report discrepancy\\\" OR (\\\"resident\\\" AND \\\"error\\\") OR \\\"preliminary\\\") AND \\\"radiology\\\" AND \\\"call”. Articles were included if they met the criteria, and relevant information was collected. Statistical analysis was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The PubMed search resulted in 107 articles, of which 20 met inclusion criteria. These studies included 616,918 preliminary reports. Pooled preliminary report major discrepancy rate (%) by modality was 0.64 for radiographs, 0.38 for US, 1.35 for CT, and 1.86 for MRI and by resident year was 1.27 for R1s, 1.05 for R2s, 0.88 for R3s, and 0.67 for R4s. The highest discrepancy rate was seen for R1s reading MRI (8.70%). The majority of papers included describe residents taking independent call, with only three having fellow or attending supervised call part of the time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Radiology residents are valuable members of the healthcare team and demonstrate high accuracy during independent call shifts. Fellow or attending real-time supervision can shorten the time to final report, and whether a hospital implements this should be decided by analyzing its individual system. This analysis is limited by variability in the classification of major discrepancies and inability to further classify data by body region scanned. In light of this, we encourage standardization in future reporting.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2342-2356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633225000157\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633225000157","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基本原理和目的在整个培训过程中,放射科住院医生经常在夜间独立出诊,而主治医生会在第二天早上过度阅读报告。呼叫轮班是放射科住院医师培训的基本组成部分,提供独立性,可以提高决策技能和专业信心。然而,由于错误有可能影响患者护理,对临床显著错误的分析至关重要。本荟萃分析的目的是组织关于随叫随到的住院医师初步报告差异率的现有数据,并比较不同模式和住院医师年限的差异率。材料与方法于2024年8月使用(“住院医师报告差异”或(“住院医师”和“错误”)或“初步”)和“放射学”和“呼叫”进行PubMed检索。符合标准的文章被纳入,并收集相关信息。进行统计学分析。结果PubMed检索到107篇文章,其中20篇符合纳入标准。这些研究包括616,918份初步报告。综合初步报告的主要差异率(%),x线片为0.64,US为0.38,CT为1.35,MRI为1.86,r15为1.27,r15为1.05,r3为0.88,r4为0.67。r15阅读MRI的差异率最高(8.70%)。大多数论文都描述了住院医生的独立电话,只有三篇论文在部分时间里有同伴或参加监督电话。结论放射科住院医师是医疗团队的重要成员,在独立值班时表现出较高的准确性。同伴或参加实时监督可以缩短到最终报告的时间,医院是否实施该制度应通过分析其个别系统来决定。这种分析受到主要差异分类的可变性和无法进一步按扫描的身体区域分类数据的限制。鉴于此,我们鼓励未来报告的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On-Call Radiology Resident Preliminary Report Major Discrepancies: A Meta-analysis

Rationale and Objectives

Throughout their training, radiology residents frequently perform independent overnight call, with attendings overreading reports the following morning. Call shifts are a fundamental part of radiology resident training, offering independence that can improve decision-making skills and professional confidence. However, because errors have the potential to affect patient care, analysis of clinically significant errors is critical. This meta-analysis was performed to organize existing data on on-call resident preliminary report discrepancy rates and to compare rates across modalities and resident years.

Materials and Methods

A PubMed search was performed in August 2024 using ("resident report discrepancy" OR ("resident" AND "error") OR "preliminary") AND "radiology" AND "call”. Articles were included if they met the criteria, and relevant information was collected. Statistical analysis was performed.

Results

The PubMed search resulted in 107 articles, of which 20 met inclusion criteria. These studies included 616,918 preliminary reports. Pooled preliminary report major discrepancy rate (%) by modality was 0.64 for radiographs, 0.38 for US, 1.35 for CT, and 1.86 for MRI and by resident year was 1.27 for R1s, 1.05 for R2s, 0.88 for R3s, and 0.67 for R4s. The highest discrepancy rate was seen for R1s reading MRI (8.70%). The majority of papers included describe residents taking independent call, with only three having fellow or attending supervised call part of the time.

Conclusion

Radiology residents are valuable members of the healthcare team and demonstrate high accuracy during independent call shifts. Fellow or attending real-time supervision can shorten the time to final report, and whether a hospital implements this should be decided by analyzing its individual system. This analysis is limited by variability in the classification of major discrepancies and inability to further classify data by body region scanned. In light of this, we encourage standardization in future reporting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信