Esther R. Richards, Keven M. Luciano, Christopher A. Nix, Dmitry M. Kolpashchikov and Erin K. H. Saitta*,
{"title":"有机化学展望:学生和教师的观点作为变革的典范","authors":"Esther R. Richards, Keven M. Luciano, Christopher A. Nix, Dmitry M. Kolpashchikov and Erin K. H. Saitta*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0143710.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >For decades, finding ways to improve student success in organic chemistry courses has attracted the attention of educators, researchers and administrators. Considering the abundance of literature describing evidence-based practices for effective organic chemistry instruction, deciding on which practices to implement can be unsystematic and overwhelming for change agents. In this study, we propose an approach to identify instructional practices with promise of success using student and faculty perceptions. Five organic chemistry faculty members were asked, through semistructured interviews, to share their experiences teaching organic chemistry courses. Based on the faculty interviews, an online survey to probe organic chemistry students’ experiences was created and administered. Following the survey, 14 organic chemistry students participated in semistructured interviews to gain insight into their survey responses. The interview transcripts were analyzed via Colaizzi’s phenomenological theming method. Comparative themes were generated that highlighted the key alignments and tensions between the student and faculty perspectives. There was a clear agreement between faculty and students that the amount of content and fast pace of organic chemistry courses is an element that makes the subject especially difficult. However, students and faculty disagreed concerning student use of resources and the student-instructor relationship in the course. Using these comparative themes, promising action items for the institution in the study include curricular reorganization, strategic emphasis of course resources, and interventions to improve student-instructor relationships. We propose this approach as a pragmatic way for faculty teams or change agents to select promising areas of evidence-based practices, providing direction for site-specific educational reform.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"102 4","pages":"1398–1409 1398–1409"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outlooks on Organic Chemistry: Student and Faculty Perspectives as a Model for Change\",\"authors\":\"Esther R. Richards, Keven M. Luciano, Christopher A. Nix, Dmitry M. Kolpashchikov and Erin K. H. Saitta*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0143710.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >For decades, finding ways to improve student success in organic chemistry courses has attracted the attention of educators, researchers and administrators. Considering the abundance of literature describing evidence-based practices for effective organic chemistry instruction, deciding on which practices to implement can be unsystematic and overwhelming for change agents. In this study, we propose an approach to identify instructional practices with promise of success using student and faculty perceptions. Five organic chemistry faculty members were asked, through semistructured interviews, to share their experiences teaching organic chemistry courses. Based on the faculty interviews, an online survey to probe organic chemistry students’ experiences was created and administered. Following the survey, 14 organic chemistry students participated in semistructured interviews to gain insight into their survey responses. The interview transcripts were analyzed via Colaizzi’s phenomenological theming method. Comparative themes were generated that highlighted the key alignments and tensions between the student and faculty perspectives. There was a clear agreement between faculty and students that the amount of content and fast pace of organic chemistry courses is an element that makes the subject especially difficult. However, students and faculty disagreed concerning student use of resources and the student-instructor relationship in the course. Using these comparative themes, promising action items for the institution in the study include curricular reorganization, strategic emphasis of course resources, and interventions to improve student-instructor relationships. We propose this approach as a pragmatic way for faculty teams or change agents to select promising areas of evidence-based practices, providing direction for site-specific educational reform.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":\"102 4\",\"pages\":\"1398–1409 1398–1409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01437\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01437","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outlooks on Organic Chemistry: Student and Faculty Perspectives as a Model for Change
For decades, finding ways to improve student success in organic chemistry courses has attracted the attention of educators, researchers and administrators. Considering the abundance of literature describing evidence-based practices for effective organic chemistry instruction, deciding on which practices to implement can be unsystematic and overwhelming for change agents. In this study, we propose an approach to identify instructional practices with promise of success using student and faculty perceptions. Five organic chemistry faculty members were asked, through semistructured interviews, to share their experiences teaching organic chemistry courses. Based on the faculty interviews, an online survey to probe organic chemistry students’ experiences was created and administered. Following the survey, 14 organic chemistry students participated in semistructured interviews to gain insight into their survey responses. The interview transcripts were analyzed via Colaizzi’s phenomenological theming method. Comparative themes were generated that highlighted the key alignments and tensions between the student and faculty perspectives. There was a clear agreement between faculty and students that the amount of content and fast pace of organic chemistry courses is an element that makes the subject especially difficult. However, students and faculty disagreed concerning student use of resources and the student-instructor relationship in the course. Using these comparative themes, promising action items for the institution in the study include curricular reorganization, strategic emphasis of course resources, and interventions to improve student-instructor relationships. We propose this approach as a pragmatic way for faculty teams or change agents to select promising areas of evidence-based practices, providing direction for site-specific educational reform.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.