有机化学展望:学生和教师的观点作为变革的典范

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Esther R. Richards, Keven M. Luciano, Christopher A. Nix, Dmitry M. Kolpashchikov and Erin K. H. Saitta*, 
{"title":"有机化学展望:学生和教师的观点作为变革的典范","authors":"Esther R. Richards,&nbsp;Keven M. Luciano,&nbsp;Christopher A. Nix,&nbsp;Dmitry M. Kolpashchikov and Erin K. H. Saitta*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0143710.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >For decades, finding ways to improve student success in organic chemistry courses has attracted the attention of educators, researchers and administrators. Considering the abundance of literature describing evidence-based practices for effective organic chemistry instruction, deciding on which practices to implement can be unsystematic and overwhelming for change agents. In this study, we propose an approach to identify instructional practices with promise of success using student and faculty perceptions. Five organic chemistry faculty members were asked, through semistructured interviews, to share their experiences teaching organic chemistry courses. Based on the faculty interviews, an online survey to probe organic chemistry students’ experiences was created and administered. Following the survey, 14 organic chemistry students participated in semistructured interviews to gain insight into their survey responses. The interview transcripts were analyzed via Colaizzi’s phenomenological theming method. Comparative themes were generated that highlighted the key alignments and tensions between the student and faculty perspectives. There was a clear agreement between faculty and students that the amount of content and fast pace of organic chemistry courses is an element that makes the subject especially difficult. However, students and faculty disagreed concerning student use of resources and the student-instructor relationship in the course. Using these comparative themes, promising action items for the institution in the study include curricular reorganization, strategic emphasis of course resources, and interventions to improve student-instructor relationships. We propose this approach as a pragmatic way for faculty teams or change agents to select promising areas of evidence-based practices, providing direction for site-specific educational reform.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"102 4","pages":"1398–1409 1398–1409"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outlooks on Organic Chemistry: Student and Faculty Perspectives as a Model for Change\",\"authors\":\"Esther R. Richards,&nbsp;Keven M. Luciano,&nbsp;Christopher A. Nix,&nbsp;Dmitry M. Kolpashchikov and Erin K. H. Saitta*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0143710.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >For decades, finding ways to improve student success in organic chemistry courses has attracted the attention of educators, researchers and administrators. Considering the abundance of literature describing evidence-based practices for effective organic chemistry instruction, deciding on which practices to implement can be unsystematic and overwhelming for change agents. In this study, we propose an approach to identify instructional practices with promise of success using student and faculty perceptions. Five organic chemistry faculty members were asked, through semistructured interviews, to share their experiences teaching organic chemistry courses. Based on the faculty interviews, an online survey to probe organic chemistry students’ experiences was created and administered. Following the survey, 14 organic chemistry students participated in semistructured interviews to gain insight into their survey responses. The interview transcripts were analyzed via Colaizzi’s phenomenological theming method. Comparative themes were generated that highlighted the key alignments and tensions between the student and faculty perspectives. There was a clear agreement between faculty and students that the amount of content and fast pace of organic chemistry courses is an element that makes the subject especially difficult. However, students and faculty disagreed concerning student use of resources and the student-instructor relationship in the course. Using these comparative themes, promising action items for the institution in the study include curricular reorganization, strategic emphasis of course resources, and interventions to improve student-instructor relationships. We propose this approach as a pragmatic way for faculty teams or change agents to select promising areas of evidence-based practices, providing direction for site-specific educational reform.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":\"102 4\",\"pages\":\"1398–1409 1398–1409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01437\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01437","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,如何提高学生在有机化学课程中的成功率一直吸引着教育工作者、研究人员和管理者的关注。考虑到大量文献描述了有效有机化学教学的循证实践,决定实施哪些实践可能是不系统的,也会让变革者不知所措。在本研究中,我们提出了一种方法,利用学生和教师的看法来确定有望取得成功的教学实践。我们通过半结构式访谈,请五位有机化学教员分享他们教授有机化学课程的经验。在教师访谈的基础上,创建并实施了一项在线调查,以探究有机化学学生的经验。调查结束后,14 名有机化学专业的学生参加了半结构式访谈,以深入了解他们对调查问卷的回答。访谈记录通过 Colaizzi 的现象学主题方法进行分析。得出的比较主题突出了学生和教师观点之间的主要一致性和紧张关系。师生明确一致认为,有机化学课程内容多、节奏快是导致该学科特别困难的一个因素。然而,师生对学生在课程中使用资源和师生关系存在分歧。利用这些比较主题,研究机构有希望采取的行动项目包括课程重组、课程资源的战略重点以及改善师生关系的干预措施。我们建议将这种方法作为教师团队或变革推动者选择有前途的循证实践领域的实用方法,为特定地点的教育改革提供方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Outlooks on Organic Chemistry: Student and Faculty Perspectives as a Model for Change

Outlooks on Organic Chemistry: Student and Faculty Perspectives as a Model for Change

For decades, finding ways to improve student success in organic chemistry courses has attracted the attention of educators, researchers and administrators. Considering the abundance of literature describing evidence-based practices for effective organic chemistry instruction, deciding on which practices to implement can be unsystematic and overwhelming for change agents. In this study, we propose an approach to identify instructional practices with promise of success using student and faculty perceptions. Five organic chemistry faculty members were asked, through semistructured interviews, to share their experiences teaching organic chemistry courses. Based on the faculty interviews, an online survey to probe organic chemistry students’ experiences was created and administered. Following the survey, 14 organic chemistry students participated in semistructured interviews to gain insight into their survey responses. The interview transcripts were analyzed via Colaizzi’s phenomenological theming method. Comparative themes were generated that highlighted the key alignments and tensions between the student and faculty perspectives. There was a clear agreement between faculty and students that the amount of content and fast pace of organic chemistry courses is an element that makes the subject especially difficult. However, students and faculty disagreed concerning student use of resources and the student-instructor relationship in the course. Using these comparative themes, promising action items for the institution in the study include curricular reorganization, strategic emphasis of course resources, and interventions to improve student-instructor relationships. We propose this approach as a pragmatic way for faculty teams or change agents to select promising areas of evidence-based practices, providing direction for site-specific educational reform.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信