使用醋酸优利司他作为紧急避孕药后的荷尔蒙避孕:系统回顾

Emily M Snyder, Kathryn M Curtis, Antoinette T Nguyen, Ananya Tadikonda, Katherine Kortsmit, Lauren B Zapata, Maura K Whiteman
{"title":"使用醋酸优利司他作为紧急避孕药后的荷尔蒙避孕:系统回顾","authors":"Emily M Snyder, Kathryn M Curtis, Antoinette T Nguyen, Ananya Tadikonda, Katherine Kortsmit, Lauren B Zapata, Maura K Whiteman","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To systematically review literature on whether hormonal contraception following ulipristal acetate (UPA) for emergency contraception decreases the effectiveness of either drug.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We searched multiple databases through December 2022 for studies assessing the interaction between UPA and hormonal contraception. The primary outcome was contraceptive effectiveness, measured by pregnancy rates or proxy measures (e.g., ovarian activity). We extracted and summarized findings from identified studies, assessed risk of bias for each study, and determined certainty of evidence for all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four studies met inclusion criteria; all had low risk of bias. Two studies assessed whether UPA use affected the ability of oral contraceptives (OCs) to inhibit ovulation; no differences were observed in ovarian activity when starting OCs 1 day after UPA compared with starting OCs 1 day after placebo. Two studies assessed whether OC use affected the ability of UPA to delay ovulation; both studies observed higher proportions of ovulation when UPA was followed by OC use versus delayed or no OC use. One study assessed ovulation risk when UPA was taken after missed OCs, followed by immediate versus delayed OC resumption; no ovulations occurred within the first 5 days after UPA administration in either group, but there was greater risk of ovulation beyond 5 days with delayed versus immediate OC resumption.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While there is no evidence that UPA affects the ability of hormonal contraception to inhibit ovulation, hormonal contraception use immediately or soon after UPA may decrease UPA's ability to delay ovulation. The certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>If a patient desires hormonal contraception after UPA, an interaction can be avoided by delaying initiation or resumption of hormonal contraception. The risk of pregnancy due to decreased UPA effectiveness with immediate hormonal contraception should be balanced against the risk of subsequent pregnancy due to delay or non-start of hormonal contraception.</p>","PeriodicalId":93955,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":" ","pages":"110898"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hormonal contraception after use of ulipristal acetate as emergency contraception: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Emily M Snyder, Kathryn M Curtis, Antoinette T Nguyen, Ananya Tadikonda, Katherine Kortsmit, Lauren B Zapata, Maura K Whiteman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To systematically review literature on whether hormonal contraception following ulipristal acetate (UPA) for emergency contraception decreases the effectiveness of either drug.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We searched multiple databases through December 2022 for studies assessing the interaction between UPA and hormonal contraception. The primary outcome was contraceptive effectiveness, measured by pregnancy rates or proxy measures (e.g., ovarian activity). We extracted and summarized findings from identified studies, assessed risk of bias for each study, and determined certainty of evidence for all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four studies met inclusion criteria; all had low risk of bias. Two studies assessed whether UPA use affected the ability of oral contraceptives (OCs) to inhibit ovulation; no differences were observed in ovarian activity when starting OCs 1 day after UPA compared with starting OCs 1 day after placebo. Two studies assessed whether OC use affected the ability of UPA to delay ovulation; both studies observed higher proportions of ovulation when UPA was followed by OC use versus delayed or no OC use. One study assessed ovulation risk when UPA was taken after missed OCs, followed by immediate versus delayed OC resumption; no ovulations occurred within the first 5 days after UPA administration in either group, but there was greater risk of ovulation beyond 5 days with delayed versus immediate OC resumption.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While there is no evidence that UPA affects the ability of hormonal contraception to inhibit ovulation, hormonal contraception use immediately or soon after UPA may decrease UPA's ability to delay ovulation. The certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>If a patient desires hormonal contraception after UPA, an interaction can be avoided by delaying initiation or resumption of hormonal contraception. The risk of pregnancy due to decreased UPA effectiveness with immediate hormonal contraception should be balanced against the risk of subsequent pregnancy due to delay or non-start of hormonal contraception.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"110898\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110898\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:系统回顾有关醋酸乌普利司司(UPA)紧急避孕后激素避孕是否会降低两种药物的有效性的文献。研究设计:我们检索了截至2022年12月的多个数据库,以评估UPA与激素避孕之间的相互作用。主要结局是避孕效果,通过妊娠率或替代指标(如卵巢活性)来衡量。我们从已确定的研究中提取并总结研究结果,评估每项研究的偏倚风险,并确定所有结果的证据确定性。结果:4项研究符合纳入标准;所有的偏倚风险都很低。两项研究评估了UPA的使用是否影响口服避孕药(OCs)抑制排卵的能力;与服用安慰剂后1天开始口服避孕药相比,在UPA后1天开始口服避孕药时,卵巢活性无差异。两项研究评估了口服避孕药是否会影响UPA延缓排卵的能力;两项研究都观察到,与延迟或不使用口服避孕药相比,在服用UPA后使用口服避孕药的排卵比例更高。一项研究评估了未排卵后服用UPA,随后立即或延迟排卵恢复时的排卵风险;两组患者在服用UPA后的前5天内均未出现排卵,但延迟或立即恢复口服避孕药后5天内排卵的风险更大。结论:虽然没有证据表明UPA会影响激素避孕药抑制排卵的能力,但立即或在UPA后不久使用激素避孕药可能会降低UPA延迟排卵的能力。证据的确定性从中等到极低不等。含义:如果患者在UPA后希望激素避孕,可以通过延迟启动或恢复激素避孕来避免与UPA的相互作用。由于UPA与立即激素避孕的有效性降低而导致的妊娠风险应与由于延迟或未开始激素避孕而导致的后续妊娠风险相平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hormonal contraception after use of ulipristal acetate as emergency contraception: A systematic review.

Objectives: To systematically review literature on whether hormonal contraception following ulipristal acetate (UPA) for emergency contraception decreases the effectiveness of either drug.

Study design: We searched multiple databases through December 2022 for studies assessing the interaction between UPA and hormonal contraception. The primary outcome was contraceptive effectiveness, measured by pregnancy rates or proxy measures (e.g., ovarian activity). We extracted and summarized findings from identified studies, assessed risk of bias for each study, and determined certainty of evidence for all outcomes.

Results: Four studies met inclusion criteria; all had low risk of bias. Two studies assessed whether UPA use affected the ability of oral contraceptives (OCs) to inhibit ovulation; no differences were observed in ovarian activity when starting OCs 1 day after UPA compared with starting OCs 1 day after placebo. Two studies assessed whether OC use affected the ability of UPA to delay ovulation; both studies observed higher proportions of ovulation when UPA was followed by OC use versus delayed or no OC use. One study assessed ovulation risk when UPA was taken after missed OCs, followed by immediate versus delayed OC resumption; no ovulations occurred within the first 5 days after UPA administration in either group, but there was greater risk of ovulation beyond 5 days with delayed versus immediate OC resumption.

Conclusions: While there is no evidence that UPA affects the ability of hormonal contraception to inhibit ovulation, hormonal contraception use immediately or soon after UPA may decrease UPA's ability to delay ovulation. The certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low.

Implications: If a patient desires hormonal contraception after UPA, an interaction can be avoided by delaying initiation or resumption of hormonal contraception. The risk of pregnancy due to decreased UPA effectiveness with immediate hormonal contraception should be balanced against the risk of subsequent pregnancy due to delay or non-start of hormonal contraception.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信