我们创造了勇敢的空间吗?关于公平、多样性、包容性和土著和解的模拟教师发展研讨会的现实主义评估报告。

IF 2.8 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
X Catherine Tong, Sonaina Chopra, Hannah Jordan, Matthew Sibbald, Aaron Geekie-Sousa, Sandra Monteiro
{"title":"我们创造了勇敢的空间吗?关于公平、多样性、包容性和土著和解的模拟教师发展研讨会的现实主义评估报告。","authors":"X Catherine Tong, Sonaina Chopra, Hannah Jordan, Matthew Sibbald, Aaron Geekie-Sousa, Sandra Monteiro","doi":"10.1186/s41077-025-00346-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Creating Brave Spaces (CBS) workshops are designed by an interprofessional team of health professions educators to empower faculty members to disrupt microaggressions in the clinical teaching environment using simulation-based education design, where actors were trained to portray sources of microaggressions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CBS team delivered eleven workshops addressing five categories of biases in various contexts during 2020-2024 engaging hundreds of participants. The team recruited participants to conduct semi-structured interviews. Records from team meetings and facilitator focus groups were collected and reviewed. The dataset was subjected to thematic analysis focusing on the participants' experience in the workshop. Themes were presented in Context-Mechanism-Outcome statements informed by the realist evaluation framework. Subsequently, the results were verified with participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine participants volunteered to be interviewed 2 to 12 weeks after attending the workshop. The interview scripts, totaling about 60,000 words, provided a rich picture of faculty members' backgrounds and experiences. Thematic analysis yielded the following results. Simulation-based education design empowered faculty members to overcome barriers and progress in their skills. During the immersive experience, participants benefited from a rare opportunity to practice aligning their values with their actions. Those who experienced microaggressions as victims or passive bystanders in their past experienced heightened emotions. Faculty members agreed that disrupting microaggressions is an important part of their work. They navigated the tension between \"calling in\" the source of the microaggression, being mindful of power dynamics in the simulated cases, and \"calling out\" the harm of microaggressions by holding the source accountable. Some recounted successes in managing subsequent incidences of microaggressions in their clinical teaching environment. The results were validated by a member-checking process, and further supported by recorded conversations during team meetings and facilitator focus groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health sciences institutions' stated strategic goals in inclusive excellence, although widely accepted by faculty members, are challenging to operationalize in the moment of a microaggression. Participants practiced this skill using simulation-based education design and reported significant and positive impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":"10 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Did we create brave spaces? A realist evaluation report on simulation-based faculty development workshop in equity, diversity, inclusivity, and Indigenous reconciliation.\",\"authors\":\"X Catherine Tong, Sonaina Chopra, Hannah Jordan, Matthew Sibbald, Aaron Geekie-Sousa, Sandra Monteiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41077-025-00346-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Creating Brave Spaces (CBS) workshops are designed by an interprofessional team of health professions educators to empower faculty members to disrupt microaggressions in the clinical teaching environment using simulation-based education design, where actors were trained to portray sources of microaggressions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CBS team delivered eleven workshops addressing five categories of biases in various contexts during 2020-2024 engaging hundreds of participants. The team recruited participants to conduct semi-structured interviews. Records from team meetings and facilitator focus groups were collected and reviewed. The dataset was subjected to thematic analysis focusing on the participants' experience in the workshop. Themes were presented in Context-Mechanism-Outcome statements informed by the realist evaluation framework. Subsequently, the results were verified with participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine participants volunteered to be interviewed 2 to 12 weeks after attending the workshop. The interview scripts, totaling about 60,000 words, provided a rich picture of faculty members' backgrounds and experiences. Thematic analysis yielded the following results. Simulation-based education design empowered faculty members to overcome barriers and progress in their skills. During the immersive experience, participants benefited from a rare opportunity to practice aligning their values with their actions. Those who experienced microaggressions as victims or passive bystanders in their past experienced heightened emotions. Faculty members agreed that disrupting microaggressions is an important part of their work. They navigated the tension between \\\"calling in\\\" the source of the microaggression, being mindful of power dynamics in the simulated cases, and \\\"calling out\\\" the harm of microaggressions by holding the source accountable. Some recounted successes in managing subsequent incidences of microaggressions in their clinical teaching environment. The results were validated by a member-checking process, and further supported by recorded conversations during team meetings and facilitator focus groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health sciences institutions' stated strategic goals in inclusive excellence, although widely accepted by faculty members, are challenging to operationalize in the moment of a microaggression. Participants practiced this skill using simulation-based education design and reported significant and positive impacts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in simulation (London, England)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972530/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in simulation (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00346-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00346-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:创建勇敢空间(CBS)讲习班是由卫生专业教育工作者组成的跨专业团队设计的,旨在通过基于模拟的教育设计,使教师能够在临床教学环境中破坏微侵犯行为,其中演员接受培训,以描绘微侵犯的来源。方法:CBS团队在2020-2024年期间举办了11次研讨会,讨论了不同背景下的五类偏见,吸引了数百名参与者。该团队招募参与者进行半结构化访谈。收集并审查了团队会议和协调人焦点小组的记录。对数据集进行了专题分析,重点是参与者在研讨会中的经验。主题以情境-机制-结果陈述的形式呈现,由现实主义评估框架提供信息。随后,与参与者验证了结果。结果:9名参与者在参加工作坊2 - 12周后自愿接受访谈。采访脚本总计约6万字,为教师的背景和经历提供了丰富的画面。专题分析产生了以下结果。基于模拟的教育设计使教师能够克服障碍并在技能方面取得进步。在沉浸式体验中,参与者受益于难得的机会,练习将自己的价值观与行动结合起来。那些在过去作为受害者或被动旁观者经历过微侵犯的人会经历更高的情绪。教职员工一致认为,破坏微侵犯是他们工作的重要组成部分。他们在“召唤”微侵犯的源头,注意模拟案例中的权力动态,以及通过追究源头的责任来“呼唤”微侵犯的危害之间找到了平衡。一些人讲述了他们在临床教学环境中成功地管理了随后的微侵犯事件。结果通过成员检查过程得到验证,并进一步得到团队会议和推动者焦点小组期间记录的对话的支持。结论:健康科学机构在包容性卓越方面所陈述的战略目标,虽然被教师广泛接受,但在微侵犯的情况下实施起来具有挑战性。参与者使用基于模拟的教育设计来练习这种技能,并报告了显著的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Did we create brave spaces? A realist evaluation report on simulation-based faculty development workshop in equity, diversity, inclusivity, and Indigenous reconciliation.

Background: Creating Brave Spaces (CBS) workshops are designed by an interprofessional team of health professions educators to empower faculty members to disrupt microaggressions in the clinical teaching environment using simulation-based education design, where actors were trained to portray sources of microaggressions.

Methods: The CBS team delivered eleven workshops addressing five categories of biases in various contexts during 2020-2024 engaging hundreds of participants. The team recruited participants to conduct semi-structured interviews. Records from team meetings and facilitator focus groups were collected and reviewed. The dataset was subjected to thematic analysis focusing on the participants' experience in the workshop. Themes were presented in Context-Mechanism-Outcome statements informed by the realist evaluation framework. Subsequently, the results were verified with participants.

Results: Nine participants volunteered to be interviewed 2 to 12 weeks after attending the workshop. The interview scripts, totaling about 60,000 words, provided a rich picture of faculty members' backgrounds and experiences. Thematic analysis yielded the following results. Simulation-based education design empowered faculty members to overcome barriers and progress in their skills. During the immersive experience, participants benefited from a rare opportunity to practice aligning their values with their actions. Those who experienced microaggressions as victims or passive bystanders in their past experienced heightened emotions. Faculty members agreed that disrupting microaggressions is an important part of their work. They navigated the tension between "calling in" the source of the microaggression, being mindful of power dynamics in the simulated cases, and "calling out" the harm of microaggressions by holding the source accountable. Some recounted successes in managing subsequent incidences of microaggressions in their clinical teaching environment. The results were validated by a member-checking process, and further supported by recorded conversations during team meetings and facilitator focus groups.

Conclusions: Health sciences institutions' stated strategic goals in inclusive excellence, although widely accepted by faculty members, are challenging to operationalize in the moment of a microaggression. Participants practiced this skill using simulation-based education design and reported significant and positive impacts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信