心源性休克中的临时机械循环支持:围手术期质量倡议和增强术后恢复联合共识报告的执行摘要心脏学会。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Michael C Grant, Manreet K Kanwar, Audrey E Spelde, Subhasis Chatterjee, Jean Deschamps, Rakesh C Arora, Andrew D Shaw, Daniel T Engelman
{"title":"心源性休克中的临时机械循环支持:围手术期质量倡议和增强术后恢复联合共识报告的执行摘要心脏学会。","authors":"Michael C Grant, Manreet K Kanwar, Audrey E Spelde, Subhasis Chatterjee, Jean Deschamps, Rakesh C Arora, Andrew D Shaw, Daniel T Engelman","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.03.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The identification, triage, and management of cardiogenic shock (CS) is complex and resource-intensive, particularly given the recent surge in the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices. This document is an executive summary of a series of consensus statements which guide the bedside clinician regarding the management of tMCS in the setting of CS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PeriOperative Quality Initiative (POQI) and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Cardiac Society convened an interdisciplinary, international panel of experts, utilized a structured appraisal of the literature and the modified Delphi method to derive consensus on a series of topics related to both CS and tMCS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effort resulted in three manuscripts with guidance related to the diagnosis, escalation/de-escalation and best practices associated with CS and the provision of tMCS. Group consensus was derived around existing clinical questions, summary guidance statements and the quality of the existing evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The POQI/ERAS Cardiac consensus series derived 27 unique statements regarding the care of patients with CS and the provision of tMCS. Key themes emerged, including the need for immediate and systematic assessment of CS severity, early initiation of tMCS, an algorithmic approach to the escalation and de-escalation of tMCS therapies and adoption of high-quality best practices associated with tMCS management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock: Executive Summary of the Joint Consensus Reports of the PeriOperative Quality Initiative and the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Cardiac Society.\",\"authors\":\"Michael C Grant, Manreet K Kanwar, Audrey E Spelde, Subhasis Chatterjee, Jean Deschamps, Rakesh C Arora, Andrew D Shaw, Daniel T Engelman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.03.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The identification, triage, and management of cardiogenic shock (CS) is complex and resource-intensive, particularly given the recent surge in the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices. This document is an executive summary of a series of consensus statements which guide the bedside clinician regarding the management of tMCS in the setting of CS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PeriOperative Quality Initiative (POQI) and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Cardiac Society convened an interdisciplinary, international panel of experts, utilized a structured appraisal of the literature and the modified Delphi method to derive consensus on a series of topics related to both CS and tMCS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effort resulted in three manuscripts with guidance related to the diagnosis, escalation/de-escalation and best practices associated with CS and the provision of tMCS. Group consensus was derived around existing clinical questions, summary guidance statements and the quality of the existing evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The POQI/ERAS Cardiac consensus series derived 27 unique statements regarding the care of patients with CS and the provision of tMCS. Key themes emerged, including the need for immediate and systematic assessment of CS severity, early initiation of tMCS, an algorithmic approach to the escalation and de-escalation of tMCS therapies and adoption of high-quality best practices associated with tMCS management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.03.024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.03.024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心源性休克(CS)的识别、分类和管理是复杂和资源密集型的,特别是考虑到最近临时机械循环支持(tMCS)设备的使用激增。本文件是一系列共识声明的执行摘要,这些共识声明指导临床医生在CS背景下管理tMCS。方法:围手术期质量倡议(POQI)和术后增强恢复(ERAS®)心脏学会召集了一个跨学科的国际专家小组,利用文献的结构化评估和改进的德尔菲法,就CS和tMCS相关的一系列主题达成共识。结果:这一努力产生了三份手稿,其中包括与CS相关的诊断、升级/降级和最佳实践指导以及tMCS的提供。小组共识是围绕现有的临床问题、摘要指导声明和现有证据的质量得出的。结论:POQI/ERAS心脏共识系列得出了27个关于CS患者护理和tMCS提供的独特陈述。关键主题出现了,包括对CS严重程度进行即时和系统评估的必要性,tMCS的早期启动,tMCS治疗升级和降级的算法方法,以及采用与tMCS管理相关的高质量最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock: Executive Summary of the Joint Consensus Reports of the PeriOperative Quality Initiative and the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Cardiac Society.

Background: The identification, triage, and management of cardiogenic shock (CS) is complex and resource-intensive, particularly given the recent surge in the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices. This document is an executive summary of a series of consensus statements which guide the bedside clinician regarding the management of tMCS in the setting of CS.

Methods: The PeriOperative Quality Initiative (POQI) and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Cardiac Society convened an interdisciplinary, international panel of experts, utilized a structured appraisal of the literature and the modified Delphi method to derive consensus on a series of topics related to both CS and tMCS.

Results: The effort resulted in three manuscripts with guidance related to the diagnosis, escalation/de-escalation and best practices associated with CS and the provision of tMCS. Group consensus was derived around existing clinical questions, summary guidance statements and the quality of the existing evidence.

Conclusions: The POQI/ERAS Cardiac consensus series derived 27 unique statements regarding the care of patients with CS and the provision of tMCS. Key themes emerged, including the need for immediate and systematic assessment of CS severity, early initiation of tMCS, an algorithmic approach to the escalation and de-escalation of tMCS therapies and adoption of high-quality best practices associated with tMCS management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Annals of Thoracic Surgery 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
1235
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features: • Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques • New Technology articles • Case reports • "How-to-do-it" features • Reviews of current literature • Supplements on symposia • Commentary pieces and correspondence • CME • Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery. An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信