心源性休克的定义和临时机械循环支持的适应症:围手术期质量倡议和增强术后恢复心脏学会联合共识报告。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Michael C Grant, Charles Scott Brudney, Jaime Hernandez-Montfort, Stephanie O Ibekwe, Amanda Rea, Christian Stoppe, Alexander Zarbock, Andrew D Shaw, Daniel T Engelman, Manreet K Kanwar
{"title":"心源性休克的定义和临时机械循环支持的适应症:围手术期质量倡议和增强术后恢复心脏学会联合共识报告。","authors":"Michael C Grant, Charles Scott Brudney, Jaime Hernandez-Montfort, Stephanie O Ibekwe, Amanda Rea, Christian Stoppe, Alexander Zarbock, Andrew D Shaw, Daniel T Engelman, Manreet K Kanwar","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.01.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) is complex and resource-intensive, particularly given the recent surge in temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices. This document was created to establish an approach to the assessment of CS to provide early and targeted therapies, including tMCS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An interdisciplinary, international panel of experts, utilizing a structured appraisal of the literature and a modified Delphi method, derived consensus regarding the assessment of CS based on pathophysiologic severity, etiology, and phenotypic clustering to guide escalation of care as well as identify those patients who might benefit from tMCS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key principles included early and continuous assessment for the evolution of shock severity to guide the escalation of care as well as establishment of the cause of CS to facilitate triage and assignment of initial therapies. Phenotypic clustering is complementary and aids in prognosis. tMCS provides the greatest benefit in CS for relief of congestion refractory to medical therapy, ideally when initiated before the development of organ injury. The use of tMCS should be preceded by an interdisciplinary discussion as part of the informed consent process to establish therapeutic goals, including exit strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the available literature and expert consensus, there is an opportunity to further standardize the approach to CS, including characterization based on the severity of the shock state, etiology, and further enhancement by phenotyping. Monitoring, early triage and timely escalation of care, including the targeted initiation of tMCS, can minimize organ injury and in-hospital mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Definitions of Cardiogenic Shock and Indications for Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: Joint Consensus Report of the PeriOperative Quality Initiative and the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Cardiac Society.\",\"authors\":\"Michael C Grant, Charles Scott Brudney, Jaime Hernandez-Montfort, Stephanie O Ibekwe, Amanda Rea, Christian Stoppe, Alexander Zarbock, Andrew D Shaw, Daniel T Engelman, Manreet K Kanwar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.01.040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) is complex and resource-intensive, particularly given the recent surge in temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices. This document was created to establish an approach to the assessment of CS to provide early and targeted therapies, including tMCS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An interdisciplinary, international panel of experts, utilizing a structured appraisal of the literature and a modified Delphi method, derived consensus regarding the assessment of CS based on pathophysiologic severity, etiology, and phenotypic clustering to guide escalation of care as well as identify those patients who might benefit from tMCS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key principles included early and continuous assessment for the evolution of shock severity to guide the escalation of care as well as establishment of the cause of CS to facilitate triage and assignment of initial therapies. Phenotypic clustering is complementary and aids in prognosis. tMCS provides the greatest benefit in CS for relief of congestion refractory to medical therapy, ideally when initiated before the development of organ injury. The use of tMCS should be preceded by an interdisciplinary discussion as part of the informed consent process to establish therapeutic goals, including exit strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the available literature and expert consensus, there is an opportunity to further standardize the approach to CS, including characterization based on the severity of the shock state, etiology, and further enhancement by phenotyping. Monitoring, early triage and timely escalation of care, including the targeted initiation of tMCS, can minimize organ injury and in-hospital mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.01.040\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.01.040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心源性休克(CS)患者的管理是复杂和资源密集的,特别是考虑到最近临时机械循环支持(tMCS)设备的激增。本文件旨在建立一种评估CS的方法,以提供早期和靶向治疗,包括tMCS。方法:一个跨学科的国际专家小组,利用文献的结构化评估和改进的德尔菲法,得出了基于病理生理严重程度、病因学和表型聚类的CS评估共识,以指导护理升级,并确定那些可能从tMCS中受益的患者。结果:主要原则包括早期和持续评估休克严重程度的演变,以指导护理的升级,以及建立CS的原因,以促进分诊和初始治疗的分配。表型聚类是互补的,有助于预后。tMCS在缓解药物治疗难治性充血方面提供了最大的益处,理想的情况是在器官损伤发展之前开始。在使用tMCS之前,应进行跨学科讨论,作为知情同意过程的一部分,以建立治疗目标,包括退出策略。结论:基于现有文献和专家共识,有机会进一步规范CS的方法,包括基于休克状态严重程度的特征,病因,以及通过表型进一步增强。监测、早期分诊和及时升级护理,包括有针对性地启动tMCS,可最大限度地减少器官损伤和住院死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Definitions of Cardiogenic Shock and Indications for Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: Joint Consensus Report of the PeriOperative Quality Initiative and the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Cardiac Society.

Background: The management of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) is complex and resource-intensive, particularly given the recent surge in temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices. This document was created to establish an approach to the assessment of CS to provide early and targeted therapies, including tMCS.

Methods: An interdisciplinary, international panel of experts, utilizing a structured appraisal of the literature and a modified Delphi method, derived consensus regarding the assessment of CS based on pathophysiologic severity, etiology, and phenotypic clustering to guide escalation of care as well as identify those patients who might benefit from tMCS.

Results: Key principles included early and continuous assessment for the evolution of shock severity to guide the escalation of care as well as establishment of the cause of CS to facilitate triage and assignment of initial therapies. Phenotypic clustering is complementary and aids in prognosis. tMCS provides the greatest benefit in CS for relief of congestion refractory to medical therapy, ideally when initiated before the development of organ injury. The use of tMCS should be preceded by an interdisciplinary discussion as part of the informed consent process to establish therapeutic goals, including exit strategies.

Conclusions: Based on the available literature and expert consensus, there is an opportunity to further standardize the approach to CS, including characterization based on the severity of the shock state, etiology, and further enhancement by phenotyping. Monitoring, early triage and timely escalation of care, including the targeted initiation of tMCS, can minimize organ injury and in-hospital mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Annals of Thoracic Surgery 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
1235
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features: • Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques • New Technology articles • Case reports • "How-to-do-it" features • Reviews of current literature • Supplements on symposia • Commentary pieces and correspondence • CME • Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery. An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信