肥胖对前列腺切除术结果的影响:来自一个大型前瞻性维持队列的见解。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Ekamjit S. Deol , Kelly S. Lehner , Anthony E. Fadel , Laureano J. Rangel , Abhinav Khanna , Matthew K. Tollefson , Paras H. Shah , Igor Frank , Stephen A. Boorjian , R. Jeffrey Karnes , Vidit Sharma
{"title":"肥胖对前列腺切除术结果的影响:来自一个大型前瞻性维持队列的见解。","authors":"Ekamjit S. Deol ,&nbsp;Kelly S. Lehner ,&nbsp;Anthony E. Fadel ,&nbsp;Laureano J. Rangel ,&nbsp;Abhinav Khanna ,&nbsp;Matthew K. Tollefson ,&nbsp;Paras H. Shah ,&nbsp;Igor Frank ,&nbsp;Stephen A. Boorjian ,&nbsp;R. Jeffrey Karnes ,&nbsp;Vidit Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In this study we aimed to explore the impact of BMI on perioperative complications, functional outcomes, and oncologic outcomes and longitudinal outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We queried our prospectively maintained radical prostatectomy (RP) registry from 1986 to 2018 for patients with cM0 prostate adenocarcinoma without prior BPH surgery or radiation therapy. Preoperative BMI was associated with the following outcomes of interest: 30-day complications, 1-year functional outcomes, and oncologic outcomes. Logistic regression analyses were used for complications and surgical outcomes and competing risk Cox proportional hazard models were used for oncologic outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In a cohort of 21,604 patients, 28.9% and 1.0% had BMI &gt; 30 (N = 6,252) and BMI &gt; 40 (N = 222), respectively. Obese patients were more likely to have positive surgical margins (29.4% vs. 25.0%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and early complications (15.0% vs. 11.1%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and these were confirmed on multivariable analysis: OR 1.04 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and OR 1.04 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), respectively. RP on obese patients also had increased operative times and blood loss. Increasing BMI was associated with lower odds for recovering potency (OR 0.95, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) but was not associated with lower rates of postoperative continence (OR 1.005, <em>P</em> = 0.403). On multivariable competing risk analysis, patients with BMI &gt; 30 had higher odds of nonprostate cancer mortality but no difference in biochemical failure, metastasis or cancer-specific survival.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>RP in obese patients can be technically challenging but delivers similar oncologic outcomes to nonobese patients. This information can be useful for patient counseling to support the use of radical prostatectomy in appropriately selected obese patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":"43 5","pages":"Pages 334.e7-334.e15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of obesity on prostatectomy outcomes: Insights from a large prospectively maintained cohort\",\"authors\":\"Ekamjit S. Deol ,&nbsp;Kelly S. Lehner ,&nbsp;Anthony E. Fadel ,&nbsp;Laureano J. Rangel ,&nbsp;Abhinav Khanna ,&nbsp;Matthew K. Tollefson ,&nbsp;Paras H. Shah ,&nbsp;Igor Frank ,&nbsp;Stephen A. Boorjian ,&nbsp;R. Jeffrey Karnes ,&nbsp;Vidit Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.01.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In this study we aimed to explore the impact of BMI on perioperative complications, functional outcomes, and oncologic outcomes and longitudinal outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We queried our prospectively maintained radical prostatectomy (RP) registry from 1986 to 2018 for patients with cM0 prostate adenocarcinoma without prior BPH surgery or radiation therapy. Preoperative BMI was associated with the following outcomes of interest: 30-day complications, 1-year functional outcomes, and oncologic outcomes. Logistic regression analyses were used for complications and surgical outcomes and competing risk Cox proportional hazard models were used for oncologic outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In a cohort of 21,604 patients, 28.9% and 1.0% had BMI &gt; 30 (N = 6,252) and BMI &gt; 40 (N = 222), respectively. Obese patients were more likely to have positive surgical margins (29.4% vs. 25.0%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and early complications (15.0% vs. 11.1%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and these were confirmed on multivariable analysis: OR 1.04 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and OR 1.04 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), respectively. RP on obese patients also had increased operative times and blood loss. Increasing BMI was associated with lower odds for recovering potency (OR 0.95, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) but was not associated with lower rates of postoperative continence (OR 1.005, <em>P</em> = 0.403). On multivariable competing risk analysis, patients with BMI &gt; 30 had higher odds of nonprostate cancer mortality but no difference in biochemical failure, metastasis or cancer-specific survival.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>RP in obese patients can be technically challenging but delivers similar oncologic outcomes to nonobese patients. This information can be useful for patient counseling to support the use of radical prostatectomy in appropriately selected obese patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\"43 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 334.e7-334.e15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078143925000183\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078143925000183","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在本研究中,我们旨在探讨BMI对围手术期并发症、功能结局、肿瘤结局和纵向结局的影响。方法:我们查询了1986年至2018年期间未接受BPH手术或放疗的cM0前列腺癌患者的前瞻性根治性前列腺切除术(RP)登记。术前BMI与以下结果相关:30天并发症、1年功能结局和肿瘤结局。并发症和手术结果采用Logistic回归分析,肿瘤结果采用竞争风险Cox比例风险模型。结果:在21,604例患者队列中,28.9%和1.0%的患者BMI为bbb30 (N = 6,252)和bbb40 (N = 222)。肥胖患者手术切缘阳性(29.4%比25.0%,P < 0.001)和早期并发症(15.0%比11.1%,P < 0.001)的可能性更大,多变量分析证实了这一点:OR分别为1.04 (P < 0.001)和1.04 (P < 0.001)。肥胖患者的RP也增加了手术时间和出血量。BMI增加与药力恢复的几率较低相关(OR 0.95, P < 0.001),但与术后失禁率较低无关(OR 1.005, P = 0.403)。在多变量竞争风险分析中,BMI为bbb30的患者非前列腺癌死亡率更高,但在生化失败、转移或癌症特异性生存方面没有差异。结论:肥胖患者的RP在技术上具有挑战性,但与非肥胖患者的肿瘤预后相似。该信息可用于患者咨询,以支持在适当选择的肥胖患者中使用根治性前列腺切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of obesity on prostatectomy outcomes: Insights from a large prospectively maintained cohort

Background

In this study we aimed to explore the impact of BMI on perioperative complications, functional outcomes, and oncologic outcomes and longitudinal outcomes.

Methods

We queried our prospectively maintained radical prostatectomy (RP) registry from 1986 to 2018 for patients with cM0 prostate adenocarcinoma without prior BPH surgery or radiation therapy. Preoperative BMI was associated with the following outcomes of interest: 30-day complications, 1-year functional outcomes, and oncologic outcomes. Logistic regression analyses were used for complications and surgical outcomes and competing risk Cox proportional hazard models were used for oncologic outcomes.

Results

In a cohort of 21,604 patients, 28.9% and 1.0% had BMI > 30 (N = 6,252) and BMI > 40 (N = 222), respectively. Obese patients were more likely to have positive surgical margins (29.4% vs. 25.0%, P < 0.001) and early complications (15.0% vs. 11.1%, P < 0.001) and these were confirmed on multivariable analysis: OR 1.04 (P < 0.001) and OR 1.04 (P < 0.001), respectively. RP on obese patients also had increased operative times and blood loss. Increasing BMI was associated with lower odds for recovering potency (OR 0.95, P < 0.001) but was not associated with lower rates of postoperative continence (OR 1.005, P = 0.403). On multivariable competing risk analysis, patients with BMI > 30 had higher odds of nonprostate cancer mortality but no difference in biochemical failure, metastasis or cancer-specific survival.

Conclusions

RP in obese patients can be technically challenging but delivers similar oncologic outcomes to nonobese patients. This information can be useful for patient counseling to support the use of radical prostatectomy in appropriately selected obese patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信