基于驾驶模拟器测试的三层综合驾驶评估:概念验证。

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION
Michel Bédard, Hillary Maxwell, Carrie Gibbons, Sacha Dubois, Bruce Weaver, Randy Middleton
{"title":"基于驾驶模拟器测试的三层综合驾驶评估:概念验证。","authors":"Michel Bédard, Hillary Maxwell, Carrie Gibbons, Sacha Dubois, Bruce Weaver, Randy Middleton","doi":"10.1080/07380577.2025.2488122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comprehensive driving evaluations for older adults with cognitive impairment are time-consuming, expensive, and involve risk. To minimize these challenges, we evaluated a three-tiered driving evaluation process incorporating cognitive tests (Step 1), a driving simulator test (Step 2), and a road test (Step 3). Participants in this study were referred to a driving assessment center for concerns about cognitive fitness-to-drive. Each participant completed all three evaluation steps. Their fitness-to-drive was determined independently by an occupational therapist and an experienced driving evaluator with a driver instructor background. Our main objective was to examine the agreement between the occupational therapist's determination of fitness-to-drive after each step and the driving evaluator's determination of fitness-to-drive after the road test. As a secondary objective, the occupational therapist's confidence in their determinations was also examined. Results showed agreement for 38.8% of participants after Step 1, 46.5% after Step 2, and 92.3% after Step 3. The mean occupational therapist's confidence rating in their determination (scale of 0 to 100; higher is better) was 36.15 after Step 1, 49.54 after Step 2, and 90.54 after Step 3. All drivers deemed to have passed the evaluation had been identified as such after the driving simulator test. These results suggest that the best agreement between the occupational therapist and the driving evaluator was reached after the final step. However, the results also indicate that for some participants, a road test may not be required following a driving simulator test. Eliminating the road test in some instances may create efficiencies and reduce cost and risk while maintaining accurate determinations of fitness-to-drive.</p>","PeriodicalId":46157,"journal":{"name":"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Three-Tiered Comprehensive Driving Evaluation Integrating a Driving Simulator Test for Drivers with Borderline Cognitive Fitness-to-Drive: Proof of Concept.\",\"authors\":\"Michel Bédard, Hillary Maxwell, Carrie Gibbons, Sacha Dubois, Bruce Weaver, Randy Middleton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07380577.2025.2488122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Comprehensive driving evaluations for older adults with cognitive impairment are time-consuming, expensive, and involve risk. To minimize these challenges, we evaluated a three-tiered driving evaluation process incorporating cognitive tests (Step 1), a driving simulator test (Step 2), and a road test (Step 3). Participants in this study were referred to a driving assessment center for concerns about cognitive fitness-to-drive. Each participant completed all three evaluation steps. Their fitness-to-drive was determined independently by an occupational therapist and an experienced driving evaluator with a driver instructor background. Our main objective was to examine the agreement between the occupational therapist's determination of fitness-to-drive after each step and the driving evaluator's determination of fitness-to-drive after the road test. As a secondary objective, the occupational therapist's confidence in their determinations was also examined. Results showed agreement for 38.8% of participants after Step 1, 46.5% after Step 2, and 92.3% after Step 3. The mean occupational therapist's confidence rating in their determination (scale of 0 to 100; higher is better) was 36.15 after Step 1, 49.54 after Step 2, and 90.54 after Step 3. All drivers deemed to have passed the evaluation had been identified as such after the driving simulator test. These results suggest that the best agreement between the occupational therapist and the driving evaluator was reached after the final step. However, the results also indicate that for some participants, a road test may not be required following a driving simulator test. Eliminating the road test in some instances may create efficiencies and reduce cost and risk while maintaining accurate determinations of fitness-to-drive.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2025.2488122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2025.2488122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对有认知障碍的老年人进行综合驾驶评估耗时长、费用高,而且存在风险。为了最大限度地减少这些挑战,我们对包含认知测试(步骤 1)、驾驶模拟器测试(步骤 2)和道路测试(步骤 3)的三级驾驶评估流程进行了评估。本研究的参与者因担心认知能力是否适合驾驶而被转介到驾驶评估中心。每位参与者都完成了所有三个评估步骤。他们的驾驶适应性由一名职业治疗师和一名具有驾驶教练背景、经验丰富的驾驶评估师独立确定。我们的主要目的是检验职业治疗师在每个步骤后对驾驶适应性的判定与驾驶评估师在路考后对驾驶适应性的判定之间的一致性。作为次要目标,还考察了职业治疗师对其判定结果的信心。结果显示,38.8% 的参与者在步骤 1 后达成一致,46.5% 的参与者在步骤 2 后达成一致,92.3% 的参与者在步骤 3 后达成一致。职业治疗师对其判定的平均信心评分(0 到 100 分,越高越好)为:步骤 1 后 36.15 分,步骤 2 后 49.54 分,步骤 3 后 90.54 分。所有被认定为通过评估的驾驶员都是在模拟驾驶测试后被认定的。这些结果表明,职业治疗师和驾驶评估师之间的最佳一致意见是在最后一步之后达成的。不过,结果也表明,对于某些参与者来说,在模拟驾驶测试之后可能不需要进行路考。在某些情况下取消路考可能会提高效率,降低成本和风险,同时保持对驾驶适应性的准确判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Three-Tiered Comprehensive Driving Evaluation Integrating a Driving Simulator Test for Drivers with Borderline Cognitive Fitness-to-Drive: Proof of Concept.

Comprehensive driving evaluations for older adults with cognitive impairment are time-consuming, expensive, and involve risk. To minimize these challenges, we evaluated a three-tiered driving evaluation process incorporating cognitive tests (Step 1), a driving simulator test (Step 2), and a road test (Step 3). Participants in this study were referred to a driving assessment center for concerns about cognitive fitness-to-drive. Each participant completed all three evaluation steps. Their fitness-to-drive was determined independently by an occupational therapist and an experienced driving evaluator with a driver instructor background. Our main objective was to examine the agreement between the occupational therapist's determination of fitness-to-drive after each step and the driving evaluator's determination of fitness-to-drive after the road test. As a secondary objective, the occupational therapist's confidence in their determinations was also examined. Results showed agreement for 38.8% of participants after Step 1, 46.5% after Step 2, and 92.3% after Step 3. The mean occupational therapist's confidence rating in their determination (scale of 0 to 100; higher is better) was 36.15 after Step 1, 49.54 after Step 2, and 90.54 after Step 3. All drivers deemed to have passed the evaluation had been identified as such after the driving simulator test. These results suggest that the best agreement between the occupational therapist and the driving evaluator was reached after the final step. However, the results also indicate that for some participants, a road test may not be required following a driving simulator test. Eliminating the road test in some instances may create efficiencies and reduce cost and risk while maintaining accurate determinations of fitness-to-drive.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Occupational Therapy in Health Care is a journal of contemporary practice in occupational therapy. It provides occupational therapy practitioners with a forum to stay up-to-date on current methods and theories in the field. Focused on everyday practice, the journal addresses the concerns of new and experienced therapists, presenting innovations in client evaluations and treatments, current research findings, critical reviews of current textbooks, descriptions of novel programs and descriptions of fieldwork innovations. An essential guide to the changing trends in health care, social services, and education, Occupational Therapy in Health Care provides occupational therapy practitioners with a forum to stay up-to-date on current methods and theories in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信