3米后退行走试验对老年人跌倒风险的预测准确性

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Ali Kapan PhD , Milos Ristic MSc , Richard Felsinger MD , Andreas Konrad PhD , Thomas Waldhoer PhD
{"title":"3米后退行走试验对老年人跌倒风险的预测准确性","authors":"Ali Kapan PhD ,&nbsp;Milos Ristic MSc ,&nbsp;Richard Felsinger MD ,&nbsp;Andreas Konrad PhD ,&nbsp;Thomas Waldhoer PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Falls are a leading cause of injury in older adults, and accurate tools to predict fall risk are essential. This study evaluates the predictive accuracy of the 3-m Backward Walk Test (3 MBWT) for fall risk, comparing it with the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), 10-m walk test (10 MWT), and fall-related questionnaires.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>The study was conducted in 2 nursing homes in Vienna, Austria. A total of 217 participants (65.9% female, median age, 80 years) were included.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fall history was recorded retrospectively over 12 months and prospectively over 4 months using interviews and a Cogvis 3D sensor system. Predictive accuracy was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC) analyses, whereas Poisson regression was used to analyze fall incidence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among participants, 86 (39.6%) reported a fall within the previous 12 months. For retrospective falls, the SPPB (AUC, 0.76), 3 MBWT (AUC, 0.75), and 10 MWT (AUC, 0.73) showed similar predictive accuracy. For prospective falls, the SPPB (AUC, 0.75) and 3 MBWT (AUC, 0.74) remained similarly accurate, whereas the 10 MWT had lower predictive power (AUC, 0.67). For the 3 MBWT, cutoff points were ≥9.31 seconds for retrospective falls (32% higher incidence; 95% CI, 1.05–1.95) and ≥8.15 seconds for prospective falls (27% higher incidence; 95% CI, 1.02–1.66). Each additional second in 3 MBWT performance increased fall incidence (retrospective, 7%; prospective, 5%). SPPB cutoffs of &lt;7.02 and &lt;8.00 were associated with 49% (95% CI, 1.06–2.21) and 30% (95% CI, 1.02–1.74) higher fall incidence, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>The 3 MBWT shows comparable accuracy with the SPPB and moderately better performance than the 10 MWT for prospective falls. Its efficiency, predictive value, and time savings make it a practical and viable tool for clinical fall risk assessment in older adults.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":"26 9","pages":"Article 105580"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Accuracy of the 3-m Backward Walk Test for Fall Risk in Older Adults\",\"authors\":\"Ali Kapan PhD ,&nbsp;Milos Ristic MSc ,&nbsp;Richard Felsinger MD ,&nbsp;Andreas Konrad PhD ,&nbsp;Thomas Waldhoer PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Falls are a leading cause of injury in older adults, and accurate tools to predict fall risk are essential. This study evaluates the predictive accuracy of the 3-m Backward Walk Test (3 MBWT) for fall risk, comparing it with the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), 10-m walk test (10 MWT), and fall-related questionnaires.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>The study was conducted in 2 nursing homes in Vienna, Austria. A total of 217 participants (65.9% female, median age, 80 years) were included.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fall history was recorded retrospectively over 12 months and prospectively over 4 months using interviews and a Cogvis 3D sensor system. Predictive accuracy was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC) analyses, whereas Poisson regression was used to analyze fall incidence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among participants, 86 (39.6%) reported a fall within the previous 12 months. For retrospective falls, the SPPB (AUC, 0.76), 3 MBWT (AUC, 0.75), and 10 MWT (AUC, 0.73) showed similar predictive accuracy. For prospective falls, the SPPB (AUC, 0.75) and 3 MBWT (AUC, 0.74) remained similarly accurate, whereas the 10 MWT had lower predictive power (AUC, 0.67). For the 3 MBWT, cutoff points were ≥9.31 seconds for retrospective falls (32% higher incidence; 95% CI, 1.05–1.95) and ≥8.15 seconds for prospective falls (27% higher incidence; 95% CI, 1.02–1.66). Each additional second in 3 MBWT performance increased fall incidence (retrospective, 7%; prospective, 5%). SPPB cutoffs of &lt;7.02 and &lt;8.00 were associated with 49% (95% CI, 1.06–2.21) and 30% (95% CI, 1.02–1.74) higher fall incidence, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>The 3 MBWT shows comparable accuracy with the SPPB and moderately better performance than the 10 MWT for prospective falls. Its efficiency, predictive value, and time savings make it a practical and viable tool for clinical fall risk assessment in older adults.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"volume\":\"26 9\",\"pages\":\"Article 105580\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861025000970\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861025000970","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:跌倒是老年人受伤的主要原因,准确预测跌倒风险的工具是必不可少的。本研究评估了3米后退步行测试(3 MBWT)对跌倒风险的预测准确性,并将其与短物理性能测试(SPPB)、10米步行测试(10 MWT)和跌倒相关问卷进行了比较。设计:横断面研究。环境和参与者:研究在奥地利维也纳的两家养老院进行。共纳入217名参与者(女性65.9%,中位年龄80岁)。方法:采用访谈和Cogvis 3D传感器系统,回顾性记录12个月以上的跌倒史,前瞻性记录4个月以上的跌倒史。通过受试者工作特征曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)分析来评估预测准确性,而泊松回归用于分析跌倒发生率。结果:在参与者中,86人(39.6%)报告在过去12个月内跌倒。对于回顾性跌倒,SPPB (AUC, 0.76)、3 MBWT (AUC, 0.75)和10 MWT (AUC, 0.73)显示出相似的预测准确性。对于预期的跌倒,SPPB (AUC, 0.75)和3 MBWT (AUC, 0.74)保持相似的准确性,而10 MWT的预测能力较低(AUC, 0.67)。对于3 MBWT,回顾性跌倒的截止点≥9.31秒(发生率高32%;95% CI, 1.05-1.95),预期跌倒≥8.15秒(发生率高27%;95% ci, 1.02-1.66)。3 MBWT表现每增加1秒,摔倒发生率增加(回顾性,7%;未来,5%)。结论和意义:3 MBWT与SPPB具有相当的准确性,在预测跌倒方面的表现略好于10 MWT。它的效率、预测价值和节省时间使其成为老年人临床跌倒风险评估的实用可行的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive Accuracy of the 3-m Backward Walk Test for Fall Risk in Older Adults

Objectives

Falls are a leading cause of injury in older adults, and accurate tools to predict fall risk are essential. This study evaluates the predictive accuracy of the 3-m Backward Walk Test (3 MBWT) for fall risk, comparing it with the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), 10-m walk test (10 MWT), and fall-related questionnaires.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting and Participants

The study was conducted in 2 nursing homes in Vienna, Austria. A total of 217 participants (65.9% female, median age, 80 years) were included.

Methods

Fall history was recorded retrospectively over 12 months and prospectively over 4 months using interviews and a Cogvis 3D sensor system. Predictive accuracy was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC) analyses, whereas Poisson regression was used to analyze fall incidence.

Results

Among participants, 86 (39.6%) reported a fall within the previous 12 months. For retrospective falls, the SPPB (AUC, 0.76), 3 MBWT (AUC, 0.75), and 10 MWT (AUC, 0.73) showed similar predictive accuracy. For prospective falls, the SPPB (AUC, 0.75) and 3 MBWT (AUC, 0.74) remained similarly accurate, whereas the 10 MWT had lower predictive power (AUC, 0.67). For the 3 MBWT, cutoff points were ≥9.31 seconds for retrospective falls (32% higher incidence; 95% CI, 1.05–1.95) and ≥8.15 seconds for prospective falls (27% higher incidence; 95% CI, 1.02–1.66). Each additional second in 3 MBWT performance increased fall incidence (retrospective, 7%; prospective, 5%). SPPB cutoffs of <7.02 and <8.00 were associated with 49% (95% CI, 1.06–2.21) and 30% (95% CI, 1.02–1.74) higher fall incidence, respectively.

Conclusions and Implications

The 3 MBWT shows comparable accuracy with the SPPB and moderately better performance than the 10 MWT for prospective falls. Its efficiency, predictive value, and time savings make it a practical and viable tool for clinical fall risk assessment in older adults.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信