非重症监护病房2型糖尿病住院患者基于连续血糖监测的胰岛素滴定方案的评估

IF 4.1 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Mikkel Thor Olsen, Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard, Signe Hjejle Jensen, Louise Mathorne Rasmussen, Carina Kirstine Klarskov, Birgitte Lindegaard, Jonas Askø Andersen, Hans Gottlieb, Suzanne Lunding, Katrine Bagge Hansen, Peter Lommer Kristensen
{"title":"非重症监护病房2型糖尿病住院患者基于连续血糖监测的胰岛素滴定方案的评估","authors":"Mikkel Thor Olsen, Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard, Signe Hjejle Jensen, Louise Mathorne Rasmussen, Carina Kirstine Klarskov, Birgitte Lindegaard, Jonas Askø Andersen, Hans Gottlieb, Suzanne Lunding, Katrine Bagge Hansen, Peter Lommer Kristensen","doi":"10.1177/19322968251331628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No widely adopted continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-based insulin titration protocol exists, which may limit the effects of inpatient CGM on glycemic and clinical outcomes. We evaluate the acceptability and operability of the protocol proposed by Olsen et al for inpatients with type 2 diabetes in non-intensive care unit (non-ICU) settings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>7 inpatient diabetes team members, responsible for daily insulin titration, decided on insulin adjustments for 353 days. The members had the option to follow the CGM-based insulin protocol or override it for basal, prandial, and correctional insulin, separately, in 84 inpatients monitored by CGM. Questionnaires were used to evaluate the protocol's operability by the teams.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 456 basal insulin titration decisions, 439 (96.3%) adhered to the protocol. For prandial insulin, adherence rates were 83.9% (125/149) for breakfast, 87.2% (130/149) for lunch, and 92.6% (138/149) for dinner (p=0.163). All correctional insulin titrations adhered to the protocol. All team members expressed a preference for having a protocol for CGM-based insulin titration and rated the protocol's usability on a 1 to 10 scale, with mean scores (SD) of 8.7 (0.9) for basal insulin, 8.3 (1.4) for prandial insulin, and 7.4 (1.9) for correctional insulin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CGM-based insulin titration protocol by Olsen et al has been successfully implemented for titrating basal, prandial, and correctional insulin in inpatients with type 2 diabetes in non-ICU settings. It was highly accepted by inpatient diabetes teams and provides a framework for effective CGM implementation in these settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"19322968251331628"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Based Insulin Titration Protocol for Inpatients With Type 2 Diabetes in Nonintensive Care Unit Settings.\",\"authors\":\"Mikkel Thor Olsen, Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard, Signe Hjejle Jensen, Louise Mathorne Rasmussen, Carina Kirstine Klarskov, Birgitte Lindegaard, Jonas Askø Andersen, Hans Gottlieb, Suzanne Lunding, Katrine Bagge Hansen, Peter Lommer Kristensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19322968251331628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No widely adopted continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-based insulin titration protocol exists, which may limit the effects of inpatient CGM on glycemic and clinical outcomes. We evaluate the acceptability and operability of the protocol proposed by Olsen et al for inpatients with type 2 diabetes in non-intensive care unit (non-ICU) settings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>7 inpatient diabetes team members, responsible for daily insulin titration, decided on insulin adjustments for 353 days. The members had the option to follow the CGM-based insulin protocol or override it for basal, prandial, and correctional insulin, separately, in 84 inpatients monitored by CGM. Questionnaires were used to evaluate the protocol's operability by the teams.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 456 basal insulin titration decisions, 439 (96.3%) adhered to the protocol. For prandial insulin, adherence rates were 83.9% (125/149) for breakfast, 87.2% (130/149) for lunch, and 92.6% (138/149) for dinner (p=0.163). All correctional insulin titrations adhered to the protocol. All team members expressed a preference for having a protocol for CGM-based insulin titration and rated the protocol's usability on a 1 to 10 scale, with mean scores (SD) of 8.7 (0.9) for basal insulin, 8.3 (1.4) for prandial insulin, and 7.4 (1.9) for correctional insulin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CGM-based insulin titration protocol by Olsen et al has been successfully implemented for titrating basal, prandial, and correctional insulin in inpatients with type 2 diabetes in non-ICU settings. It was highly accepted by inpatient diabetes teams and provides a framework for effective CGM implementation in these settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19322968251331628\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968251331628\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968251331628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前还没有广泛采用的基于连续血糖监测(CGM)的胰岛素滴定方案,这可能限制了住院患者CGM对血糖和临床结局的影响。我们评估了Olsen等人提出的非重症监护病房(non-ICU) 2型糖尿病住院患者方案的可接受性和可操作性。方法:7名住院糖尿病患者小组成员,负责每日胰岛素滴定,决定胰岛素调整353天。在84名由CGM监测的住院患者中,成员可以选择遵循基于CGM的胰岛素方案或分别覆盖基础胰岛素、膳食胰岛素和矫正胰岛素。小组使用问卷来评估协议的可操作性。结果:在456例基础胰岛素滴定决定中,439例(96.3%)遵守了方案。早餐、午餐和晚餐的胰岛素依从率分别为83.9%(125/149)、87.2%(130/149)和92.6%(138/149),差异有统计学意义(p=0.163)。所有校正胰岛素滴定均遵守方案。所有团队成员都表达了对基于cgm的胰岛素滴定方案的偏好,并对方案的可用性进行了1到10级的评分,基础胰岛素的平均得分为8.7(0.9),膳食胰岛素的平均得分为8.3(1.4),矫正胰岛素的平均得分为7.4(1.9)。结论:Olsen等人基于cgm的胰岛素滴定方案已成功用于非icu病房2型糖尿病住院患者基础、膳食和矫正胰岛素的滴定。它被住院糖尿病患者团队高度接受,并为在这些环境中有效实施CGM提供了一个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Based Insulin Titration Protocol for Inpatients With Type 2 Diabetes in Nonintensive Care Unit Settings.

Background: No widely adopted continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-based insulin titration protocol exists, which may limit the effects of inpatient CGM on glycemic and clinical outcomes. We evaluate the acceptability and operability of the protocol proposed by Olsen et al for inpatients with type 2 diabetes in non-intensive care unit (non-ICU) settings.

Method: 7 inpatient diabetes team members, responsible for daily insulin titration, decided on insulin adjustments for 353 days. The members had the option to follow the CGM-based insulin protocol or override it for basal, prandial, and correctional insulin, separately, in 84 inpatients monitored by CGM. Questionnaires were used to evaluate the protocol's operability by the teams.

Results: Of 456 basal insulin titration decisions, 439 (96.3%) adhered to the protocol. For prandial insulin, adherence rates were 83.9% (125/149) for breakfast, 87.2% (130/149) for lunch, and 92.6% (138/149) for dinner (p=0.163). All correctional insulin titrations adhered to the protocol. All team members expressed a preference for having a protocol for CGM-based insulin titration and rated the protocol's usability on a 1 to 10 scale, with mean scores (SD) of 8.7 (0.9) for basal insulin, 8.3 (1.4) for prandial insulin, and 7.4 (1.9) for correctional insulin.

Conclusions: The CGM-based insulin titration protocol by Olsen et al has been successfully implemented for titrating basal, prandial, and correctional insulin in inpatients with type 2 diabetes in non-ICU settings. It was highly accepted by inpatient diabetes teams and provides a framework for effective CGM implementation in these settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (JDST) is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Diabetes Technology Society. JDST covers scientific and clinical aspects of diabetes technology including glucose monitoring, insulin and metabolic peptide delivery, the artificial pancreas, digital health, precision medicine, social media, cybersecurity, software for modeling, physiologic monitoring, technology for managing obesity, and diagnostic tests of glycation. The journal also covers the development and use of mobile applications and wireless communication, as well as bioengineered tools such as MEMS, new biomaterials, and nanotechnology to develop new sensors. Articles in JDST cover both basic research and clinical applications of technologies being developed to help people with diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信