{"title":"SPECT/CT加减影甲状旁腺显像对甲状旁腺功能亢进的诊断作用:主要是终末期肾病患者的队列","authors":"Worachart Jitrapinate, Yutapong Raruenrom, Nantaporn Wongsurawat, Prakasit Sa-Ngiamwibool, Daris Theerakulpisut","doi":"10.1186/s13550-025-01234-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SPECT/CT has been well established as a valuable technique in nuclear medicine parathyroid imaging, but most previous studies were done in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. In this retrospective study, we examined the diagnostic performance of [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]NaTcO4 / [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]Tc-MIBI planar subtraction parathyroid scintigraphy (PS), SPECT/CT, and a combination of the two in a patient cohort consisting of mostly end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with secondary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism, using histopathological results as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 116 patients included, 98 (84.5%) had ESRD. The overall sensitivity of subtraction PS, SPECT/CT and combined interpretation was 69% (95% confidence interval: 64-73%), 67% (61-72%), and 79% (74-84%), while the specificity was 68% (59-76%), 71% (61-80%), and 60% (50-70%), respectively. For patients without ESRD with predominantly primary hyperparathyroidism, the sensitivity was 93% (70-99%), 89% (57-98%), and 100% (70-100%), and the specificity was 88% (76-94%), 87% (71-95%), and 84% (67-93%), respectively. For those with ESRD with predominantly tertiary and secondary hyperparathyroidism, the sensitivity was 67% (62-72%), 66% (60-71%), 78% (73-83%), and the specificity was 55% (42-67%), 57% (43-70%), and 43% (30-58%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SPECT/CT was not superior to subtraction PS in ESRD patients with hyperparathyroidism. Combining these two techniques improves sensitivity, but likely with the expense of reduction in specificity. Both planar subtraction PS and SPECT/CT have suboptimal diagnostic performance in ESRD patients compared with non-ESRD patients where these techniques provide impressive sensitivity and specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11611,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SPECT/CT in addition to subtraction parathyroid scintigraphy in hyperparathyroidism: diagnostic performance in a cohort of predominantly end-stage renal disease patients.\",\"authors\":\"Worachart Jitrapinate, Yutapong Raruenrom, Nantaporn Wongsurawat, Prakasit Sa-Ngiamwibool, Daris Theerakulpisut\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13550-025-01234-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SPECT/CT has been well established as a valuable technique in nuclear medicine parathyroid imaging, but most previous studies were done in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. In this retrospective study, we examined the diagnostic performance of [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]NaTcO4 / [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]Tc-MIBI planar subtraction parathyroid scintigraphy (PS), SPECT/CT, and a combination of the two in a patient cohort consisting of mostly end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with secondary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism, using histopathological results as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 116 patients included, 98 (84.5%) had ESRD. The overall sensitivity of subtraction PS, SPECT/CT and combined interpretation was 69% (95% confidence interval: 64-73%), 67% (61-72%), and 79% (74-84%), while the specificity was 68% (59-76%), 71% (61-80%), and 60% (50-70%), respectively. For patients without ESRD with predominantly primary hyperparathyroidism, the sensitivity was 93% (70-99%), 89% (57-98%), and 100% (70-100%), and the specificity was 88% (76-94%), 87% (71-95%), and 84% (67-93%), respectively. For those with ESRD with predominantly tertiary and secondary hyperparathyroidism, the sensitivity was 67% (62-72%), 66% (60-71%), 78% (73-83%), and the specificity was 55% (42-67%), 57% (43-70%), and 43% (30-58%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SPECT/CT was not superior to subtraction PS in ESRD patients with hyperparathyroidism. Combining these two techniques improves sensitivity, but likely with the expense of reduction in specificity. Both planar subtraction PS and SPECT/CT have suboptimal diagnostic performance in ESRD patients compared with non-ESRD patients where these techniques provide impressive sensitivity and specificity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJNMMI Research\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972272/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJNMMI Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-025-01234-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-025-01234-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
SPECT/CT in addition to subtraction parathyroid scintigraphy in hyperparathyroidism: diagnostic performance in a cohort of predominantly end-stage renal disease patients.
Background: SPECT/CT has been well established as a valuable technique in nuclear medicine parathyroid imaging, but most previous studies were done in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. In this retrospective study, we examined the diagnostic performance of [99mTc]NaTcO4 / [99mTc]Tc-MIBI planar subtraction parathyroid scintigraphy (PS), SPECT/CT, and a combination of the two in a patient cohort consisting of mostly end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with secondary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism, using histopathological results as the reference standard.
Results: Among 116 patients included, 98 (84.5%) had ESRD. The overall sensitivity of subtraction PS, SPECT/CT and combined interpretation was 69% (95% confidence interval: 64-73%), 67% (61-72%), and 79% (74-84%), while the specificity was 68% (59-76%), 71% (61-80%), and 60% (50-70%), respectively. For patients without ESRD with predominantly primary hyperparathyroidism, the sensitivity was 93% (70-99%), 89% (57-98%), and 100% (70-100%), and the specificity was 88% (76-94%), 87% (71-95%), and 84% (67-93%), respectively. For those with ESRD with predominantly tertiary and secondary hyperparathyroidism, the sensitivity was 67% (62-72%), 66% (60-71%), 78% (73-83%), and the specificity was 55% (42-67%), 57% (43-70%), and 43% (30-58%), respectively.
Conclusion: SPECT/CT was not superior to subtraction PS in ESRD patients with hyperparathyroidism. Combining these two techniques improves sensitivity, but likely with the expense of reduction in specificity. Both planar subtraction PS and SPECT/CT have suboptimal diagnostic performance in ESRD patients compared with non-ESRD patients where these techniques provide impressive sensitivity and specificity.
EJNMMI ResearchRADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING&nb-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
72
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍:
EJNMMI Research publishes new basic, translational and clinical research in the field of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. Regular features include original research articles, rapid communication of preliminary data on innovative research, interesting case reports, editorials, and letters to the editor. Educational articles on basic sciences, fundamental aspects and controversy related to pre-clinical and clinical research or ethical aspects of research are also welcome. Timely reviews provide updates on current applications, issues in imaging research and translational aspects of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging technologies.
The main emphasis is placed on the development of targeted imaging with radiopharmaceuticals within the broader context of molecular probes to enhance understanding and characterisation of the complex biological processes underlying disease and to develop, test and guide new treatment modalities, including radionuclide therapy.