比较术后镇痛方案的有效性和安全性(CARES):务实的国际多中心随机试验方案。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mark C Bicket, Karim Shiraz Ladha, Simon Haroutounian, Kellie McFarlin, Mary Neff, Rachel L McDuffie, Jennifer F Waljee, Duminda Nalaka Wijeysundera, Chad Brummet, Yi Li
{"title":"比较术后镇痛方案的有效性和安全性(CARES):务实的国际多中心随机试验方案。","authors":"Mark C Bicket, Karim Shiraz Ladha, Simon Haroutounian, Kellie McFarlin, Mary Neff, Rachel L McDuffie, Jennifer F Waljee, Duminda Nalaka Wijeysundera, Chad Brummet, Yi Li","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute pain is commonly experienced by millions of patients who undergo outpatient surgical procedures. Moreover, an increasing number of procedures are performed on an outpatient basis, requiring greater postoperative planning to ensure effective pain management. Analgesic approaches commonly involve prescription opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), but an optimal regimen that balances pain and adverse effects has not been identified. In addition, critical gaps in evidence exist regarding how opioids and NSAIDs compare as analgesic regimens after surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The Comparing Analgesic Regimen Effectiveness and Safety after Surgery (CARES) trial is a pragmatic, international, multicentre randomised trial that enrols adults undergoing three elective surgical procedures (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, breast lumpectomy, hernia repair). Participants are randomised to receive discharge analgesic prescriptions that consist of either NSAIDs or low-dose opioids (ie, 10 pills of oxycodone 5 mg or equivalent), with both groups prescribed acetaminophen around-the-clock. The primary effectiveness outcome is patient-reported worst daily pain intensity over the first 7 days after surgery. The primary safety outcome is the occurrence of opioid and/or NSAID side effects over the first 7 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes are assessed by patient report and medical record review at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery and include sleep disturbance, patient perception of improvement/change after treatment, pain interference, anxiety, depression, health-related quality of life, clinically important adverse events, substance use, opioid misuse, chronic pain, healthcare utilisation related to pain and quality of recovery.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Investigational review boards at the University of Michigan and other sites have approved the CARES trial. The first patient enrolled in CARES in February 2023, with recruitment anticipated through 2026. Dissemination builds on the input of patient partners and other members of an engaged Stakeholder Advisory Board, with activities spanning co-production of summaries to share results with study participants, publications in biomedical journals and lay press, presentations to scientific and community organisations, and other multimedia communication materials.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05722002.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 4","pages":"e099925"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973795/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Analgesic Regimen Effectiveness and Safety after Surgery (CARES): protocol for a pragmatic, international multicentre randomised trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mark C Bicket, Karim Shiraz Ladha, Simon Haroutounian, Kellie McFarlin, Mary Neff, Rachel L McDuffie, Jennifer F Waljee, Duminda Nalaka Wijeysundera, Chad Brummet, Yi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute pain is commonly experienced by millions of patients who undergo outpatient surgical procedures. Moreover, an increasing number of procedures are performed on an outpatient basis, requiring greater postoperative planning to ensure effective pain management. Analgesic approaches commonly involve prescription opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), but an optimal regimen that balances pain and adverse effects has not been identified. In addition, critical gaps in evidence exist regarding how opioids and NSAIDs compare as analgesic regimens after surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The Comparing Analgesic Regimen Effectiveness and Safety after Surgery (CARES) trial is a pragmatic, international, multicentre randomised trial that enrols adults undergoing three elective surgical procedures (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, breast lumpectomy, hernia repair). Participants are randomised to receive discharge analgesic prescriptions that consist of either NSAIDs or low-dose opioids (ie, 10 pills of oxycodone 5 mg or equivalent), with both groups prescribed acetaminophen around-the-clock. The primary effectiveness outcome is patient-reported worst daily pain intensity over the first 7 days after surgery. The primary safety outcome is the occurrence of opioid and/or NSAID side effects over the first 7 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes are assessed by patient report and medical record review at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery and include sleep disturbance, patient perception of improvement/change after treatment, pain interference, anxiety, depression, health-related quality of life, clinically important adverse events, substance use, opioid misuse, chronic pain, healthcare utilisation related to pain and quality of recovery.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Investigational review boards at the University of Michigan and other sites have approved the CARES trial. The first patient enrolled in CARES in February 2023, with recruitment anticipated through 2026. Dissemination builds on the input of patient partners and other members of an engaged Stakeholder Advisory Board, with activities spanning co-production of summaries to share results with study participants, publications in biomedical journals and lay press, presentations to scientific and community organisations, and other multimedia communication materials.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05722002.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"e099925\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973795/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099925\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099925","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:急性疼痛是常见的经验,数以百万计的患者谁接受门诊手术。此外,越来越多的手术是在门诊进行的,需要更多的术后计划来确保有效的疼痛管理。镇痛方法通常包括处方阿片类药物和非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs),但平衡疼痛和不良反应的最佳方案尚未确定。此外,关于阿片类药物和非甾体抗炎药作为手术后镇痛方案的比较,证据存在重大差距。方法和分析:比较术后镇痛方案的有效性和安全性(CARES)试验是一项实用的、国际的、多中心的随机试验,招募了接受三种选择性外科手术(腹腔镜胆囊切除术、乳房肿瘤切除术、疝修补术)的成年人。参与者被随机分配接受出院镇痛处方,其中包括非甾体抗炎药或低剂量阿片类药物(即10粒羟考酮5毫克或同等剂量),两组都24小时开对乙酰氨基酚。主要疗效指标是术后前7天患者报告的每日最严重疼痛强度。主要的安全性指标是术后前7天阿片类药物和/或非甾体抗炎药副作用的发生情况。次要结局通过术后1周、1个月、3个月和6个月的患者报告和医疗记录评估,包括睡眠障碍、治疗后患者对改善/改变的感知、疼痛干扰、焦虑、抑郁、与健康相关的生活质量、临床重要不良事件、物质使用、阿片类药物滥用、慢性疼痛、与疼痛相关的医疗保健利用和恢复质量。伦理和传播:密歇根大学和其他地方的研究审查委员会已经批准了CARES试验。第一位患者于2023年2月加入CARES,预计招募到2026年。传播建立在患者合作伙伴和参与的利益攸关方咨询委员会其他成员的投入基础上,活动包括共同制作摘要,与研究参与者分享结果,在生物医学期刊和非专业媒体上发表出版物,向科学和社区组织介绍,以及其他多媒体传播材料。试验注册号:NCT05722002。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Analgesic Regimen Effectiveness and Safety after Surgery (CARES): protocol for a pragmatic, international multicentre randomised trial.

Introduction: Acute pain is commonly experienced by millions of patients who undergo outpatient surgical procedures. Moreover, an increasing number of procedures are performed on an outpatient basis, requiring greater postoperative planning to ensure effective pain management. Analgesic approaches commonly involve prescription opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), but an optimal regimen that balances pain and adverse effects has not been identified. In addition, critical gaps in evidence exist regarding how opioids and NSAIDs compare as analgesic regimens after surgery.

Methods and analysis: The Comparing Analgesic Regimen Effectiveness and Safety after Surgery (CARES) trial is a pragmatic, international, multicentre randomised trial that enrols adults undergoing three elective surgical procedures (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, breast lumpectomy, hernia repair). Participants are randomised to receive discharge analgesic prescriptions that consist of either NSAIDs or low-dose opioids (ie, 10 pills of oxycodone 5 mg or equivalent), with both groups prescribed acetaminophen around-the-clock. The primary effectiveness outcome is patient-reported worst daily pain intensity over the first 7 days after surgery. The primary safety outcome is the occurrence of opioid and/or NSAID side effects over the first 7 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes are assessed by patient report and medical record review at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery and include sleep disturbance, patient perception of improvement/change after treatment, pain interference, anxiety, depression, health-related quality of life, clinically important adverse events, substance use, opioid misuse, chronic pain, healthcare utilisation related to pain and quality of recovery.

Ethics and dissemination: Investigational review boards at the University of Michigan and other sites have approved the CARES trial. The first patient enrolled in CARES in February 2023, with recruitment anticipated through 2026. Dissemination builds on the input of patient partners and other members of an engaged Stakeholder Advisory Board, with activities spanning co-production of summaries to share results with study participants, publications in biomedical journals and lay press, presentations to scientific and community organisations, and other multimedia communication materials.

Trial registration number: NCT05722002.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信