Matt J. Jones, Fiona Nichols-Fleming, Alexander J. Evans, Brandon C. Johnson, Jeffrey C. Andrews-Hanna
{"title":"月球的质心偏移是否可以用一个均匀的原始地壳来解释?","authors":"Matt J. Jones, Fiona Nichols-Fleming, Alexander J. Evans, Brandon C. Johnson, Jeffrey C. Andrews-Hanna","doi":"10.1029/2024JE008783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A fundamental constraint on the Moon's interior mass distribution is the 1.935-km lunar center of mass (COM)–center of figure (COF) offset. Extant constraints on the mass asymmetry that generates the COM-COF offset—commonly attributed to a crustal thickness asymmetry wherein the nearside crust is thinner than that of the farside—do not permit a unique solution for the lunar interior structure. Using simple analytical models of isostasy and porosity evolution, we quantify potential contributions to the lunar mass asymmetry from nearside-farside asymmetries (specifically, spherical harmonic degree-1 variations) in porosity, crustal basalts, and dense late-stage magma ocean cumulates. We demonstrate that these asymmetries could simultaneously explain the COM-COF offset and allow for a lunar crust that formed with globally uniform thickness and porosity. Scenarios with an excess of ∼10–44 km of late-stage cumulates in the nearside relative to the farside allow for full ranges of 5%–12% nearside anorthosite porosity, 1–2 km of excess nearside basalts, and nearside crustal thickness of either 30 km or 38 km. Furthermore, under specific conditions (30-km nearside crust with low porosity and high late-stage cumulate density of ∼3,600 kg/m<sup>3</sup>), the COM-COF offset permits an initially uniform crust as well as a present-day crust with uniform thickness. While observational constraints do not favor perfectly symmetric present-day crustal thickness, our analyses highlight the importance of higher fidelity characterization of the lunar interior structure and the use of caution in investigations that fundamentally rely on lunar crustal thickness constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can the Moon's Center of Mass–Center of Figure Offset Be Explained With a Uniform Primordial Crust?\",\"authors\":\"Matt J. Jones, Fiona Nichols-Fleming, Alexander J. Evans, Brandon C. Johnson, Jeffrey C. Andrews-Hanna\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JE008783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A fundamental constraint on the Moon's interior mass distribution is the 1.935-km lunar center of mass (COM)–center of figure (COF) offset. Extant constraints on the mass asymmetry that generates the COM-COF offset—commonly attributed to a crustal thickness asymmetry wherein the nearside crust is thinner than that of the farside—do not permit a unique solution for the lunar interior structure. Using simple analytical models of isostasy and porosity evolution, we quantify potential contributions to the lunar mass asymmetry from nearside-farside asymmetries (specifically, spherical harmonic degree-1 variations) in porosity, crustal basalts, and dense late-stage magma ocean cumulates. We demonstrate that these asymmetries could simultaneously explain the COM-COF offset and allow for a lunar crust that formed with globally uniform thickness and porosity. Scenarios with an excess of ∼10–44 km of late-stage cumulates in the nearside relative to the farside allow for full ranges of 5%–12% nearside anorthosite porosity, 1–2 km of excess nearside basalts, and nearside crustal thickness of either 30 km or 38 km. Furthermore, under specific conditions (30-km nearside crust with low porosity and high late-stage cumulate density of ∼3,600 kg/m<sup>3</sup>), the COM-COF offset permits an initially uniform crust as well as a present-day crust with uniform thickness. While observational constraints do not favor perfectly symmetric present-day crustal thickness, our analyses highlight the importance of higher fidelity characterization of the lunar interior structure and the use of caution in investigations that fundamentally rely on lunar crustal thickness constraints.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"volume\":\"130 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008783\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008783","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Can the Moon's Center of Mass–Center of Figure Offset Be Explained With a Uniform Primordial Crust?
A fundamental constraint on the Moon's interior mass distribution is the 1.935-km lunar center of mass (COM)–center of figure (COF) offset. Extant constraints on the mass asymmetry that generates the COM-COF offset—commonly attributed to a crustal thickness asymmetry wherein the nearside crust is thinner than that of the farside—do not permit a unique solution for the lunar interior structure. Using simple analytical models of isostasy and porosity evolution, we quantify potential contributions to the lunar mass asymmetry from nearside-farside asymmetries (specifically, spherical harmonic degree-1 variations) in porosity, crustal basalts, and dense late-stage magma ocean cumulates. We demonstrate that these asymmetries could simultaneously explain the COM-COF offset and allow for a lunar crust that formed with globally uniform thickness and porosity. Scenarios with an excess of ∼10–44 km of late-stage cumulates in the nearside relative to the farside allow for full ranges of 5%–12% nearside anorthosite porosity, 1–2 km of excess nearside basalts, and nearside crustal thickness of either 30 km or 38 km. Furthermore, under specific conditions (30-km nearside crust with low porosity and high late-stage cumulate density of ∼3,600 kg/m3), the COM-COF offset permits an initially uniform crust as well as a present-day crust with uniform thickness. While observational constraints do not favor perfectly symmetric present-day crustal thickness, our analyses highlight the importance of higher fidelity characterization of the lunar interior structure and the use of caution in investigations that fundamentally rely on lunar crustal thickness constraints.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.