{"title":"“SWell”儿童重症护理人员福利干预:可行性研究","authors":"Rachel L. Shaw, Amy Fox, Shoshana Gander-Zaucker, Karen Maher, Sally Crighton","doi":"10.1111/jep.70092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Paediatric Critical Care (PCC) staff experience high levels of stress, distress and burnout. The objective was to test feasibility of delivering staff wellbeing interventions in UK PCC units.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The method was a feasibility study of Staff Wellbeing interventions using standardized psychological measures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design and Participants</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a multi-centre feasibility (non-randomised) study at 14 UK PCC units during 2023. Interdisciplinary PCC staff were recruited through principal investigators (PIs) at each site.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Collection Instruments</h3>\n \n <p>The primary outcome measure tested was the Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale. Secondary outcome measures tested were: Brief Resilience Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale with acceptability and feasibility surveys. All were completed online using Qualtrics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Procedures</h3>\n \n <p>Two ‘SWell’ Staff Wellbeing interventions were tested: Mad-Sad-Glad and Wellbeing Images with Appreciative Inquiry. They were low-intensity, group-based, structured reflective discussions delivered by PIs. Baseline measures (<i>t</i>0) were completed by 596 staff, 264 (43%) completed immediate post-intervention (<i>t</i>1), with 6% and 5% at 3 (<i>t</i>2) and 6 (<i>t</i>3) months post-intervention, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>50% (<i>n</i> = 14) of UK PCC units delivered 104 interventions to 573 staff demonstrating delivery feasibility.</p>\n \n <p>Wilcoxon signed-rank tests found that wellbeing scores and depression scores were significantly improved in matched pairs (<i>t</i>0, <i>t</i>1; <i>n</i> = 130). Staff ratings indicated high acceptability and feasibility for incorporating interventions into everyday practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>‘SWell’ interventions are feasible to deliver. Pre/post data collection is possible but significant attrition prohibited long-term follow-up. Significant improvements in wellbeing demonstrated appropriateness of outcome measures to detect changes in psychological wellbeing. Further evaluation work is required to determine whether positive changes are sustainable longer-term.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70092","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘SWell’ Staff Wellbeing Interventions in Paediatric Critical Care: A Feasibility Study\",\"authors\":\"Rachel L. Shaw, Amy Fox, Shoshana Gander-Zaucker, Karen Maher, Sally Crighton\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Paediatric Critical Care (PCC) staff experience high levels of stress, distress and burnout. The objective was to test feasibility of delivering staff wellbeing interventions in UK PCC units.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The method was a feasibility study of Staff Wellbeing interventions using standardized psychological measures.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Study Design and Participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a multi-centre feasibility (non-randomised) study at 14 UK PCC units during 2023. Interdisciplinary PCC staff were recruited through principal investigators (PIs) at each site.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data Collection Instruments</h3>\\n \\n <p>The primary outcome measure tested was the Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale. Secondary outcome measures tested were: Brief Resilience Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale with acceptability and feasibility surveys. All were completed online using Qualtrics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Procedures</h3>\\n \\n <p>Two ‘SWell’ Staff Wellbeing interventions were tested: Mad-Sad-Glad and Wellbeing Images with Appreciative Inquiry. They were low-intensity, group-based, structured reflective discussions delivered by PIs. Baseline measures (<i>t</i>0) were completed by 596 staff, 264 (43%) completed immediate post-intervention (<i>t</i>1), with 6% and 5% at 3 (<i>t</i>2) and 6 (<i>t</i>3) months post-intervention, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>50% (<i>n</i> = 14) of UK PCC units delivered 104 interventions to 573 staff demonstrating delivery feasibility.</p>\\n \\n <p>Wilcoxon signed-rank tests found that wellbeing scores and depression scores were significantly improved in matched pairs (<i>t</i>0, <i>t</i>1; <i>n</i> = 130). Staff ratings indicated high acceptability and feasibility for incorporating interventions into everyday practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>‘SWell’ interventions are feasible to deliver. Pre/post data collection is possible but significant attrition prohibited long-term follow-up. Significant improvements in wellbeing demonstrated appropriateness of outcome measures to detect changes in psychological wellbeing. Further evaluation work is required to determine whether positive changes are sustainable longer-term.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70092\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70092\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
‘SWell’ Staff Wellbeing Interventions in Paediatric Critical Care: A Feasibility Study
Introduction
Paediatric Critical Care (PCC) staff experience high levels of stress, distress and burnout. The objective was to test feasibility of delivering staff wellbeing interventions in UK PCC units.
Materials and Methods
The method was a feasibility study of Staff Wellbeing interventions using standardized psychological measures.
Study Design and Participants
We conducted a multi-centre feasibility (non-randomised) study at 14 UK PCC units during 2023. Interdisciplinary PCC staff were recruited through principal investigators (PIs) at each site.
Data Collection Instruments
The primary outcome measure tested was the Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale. Secondary outcome measures tested were: Brief Resilience Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale with acceptability and feasibility surveys. All were completed online using Qualtrics.
Procedures
Two ‘SWell’ Staff Wellbeing interventions were tested: Mad-Sad-Glad and Wellbeing Images with Appreciative Inquiry. They were low-intensity, group-based, structured reflective discussions delivered by PIs. Baseline measures (t0) were completed by 596 staff, 264 (43%) completed immediate post-intervention (t1), with 6% and 5% at 3 (t2) and 6 (t3) months post-intervention, respectively.
Results
50% (n = 14) of UK PCC units delivered 104 interventions to 573 staff demonstrating delivery feasibility.
Wilcoxon signed-rank tests found that wellbeing scores and depression scores were significantly improved in matched pairs (t0, t1; n = 130). Staff ratings indicated high acceptability and feasibility for incorporating interventions into everyday practice.
Discussion
‘SWell’ interventions are feasible to deliver. Pre/post data collection is possible but significant attrition prohibited long-term follow-up. Significant improvements in wellbeing demonstrated appropriateness of outcome measures to detect changes in psychological wellbeing. Further evaluation work is required to determine whether positive changes are sustainable longer-term.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.