澳大利亚妇女妊娠期常规疫苗、COVID-19和呼吸道合胞病毒疫苗接种经验和信息需求的定性探讨

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Claire Carew , Ashleigh Rak , Jane Tuckerman , Deborah Pidd , Sophie Vasiliadis , Margie Danchin , Jessica Kaufman
{"title":"澳大利亚妇女妊娠期常规疫苗、COVID-19和呼吸道合胞病毒疫苗接种经验和信息需求的定性探讨","authors":"Claire Carew ,&nbsp;Ashleigh Rak ,&nbsp;Jane Tuckerman ,&nbsp;Deborah Pidd ,&nbsp;Sophie Vasiliadis ,&nbsp;Margie Danchin ,&nbsp;Jessica Kaufman","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><div>New maternal vaccine introduction may affect pregnant women's information needs and decision-making processes.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>The number of vaccines available to pregnant women in Australia has doubled with the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccine during the pandemic and recent approval of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study explored the maternal vaccine experiences and evolving information needs of Australian pregnant women during and since the pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This qualitative study recruited participants through social media and a Melbourne public antenatal clinic. Eligible women were either pregnant mid-pandemic (gave birth May 2021-April 2022) or pregnant post-pandemic during the study period (June 2023-March 2024). Online interviews exploring information-seeking and decision-making practices for influenza, pertussis, COVID-19, and maternal RSV vaccines were inductively thematically analysed.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>We interviewed twenty-two women with different levels of vaccine acceptance, identifying four themes: (i) “Full mother mode” to protect the baby - perceived disease risk influenced vaccine decision-making; (ii) “Fear of the unknown and comfort of the familiar” – testing and safety data on known vaccines provided confidence. More information was needed for the new RSV vaccine due to less familiarity; (iii) Whatever the provider says, “she's the professional” - providers’ recommendations and personal vaccine decisions provided reassurance; (iv) “I want time to learn about it\" – women preferred consistent information early in pregnancy for unhurried decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Information about new maternal vaccines like RSV should be provided early in pregnancy, emphasising vaccine testing rigour, effectiveness and safety for the baby. Consistent recommendations across providers are essential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 104402"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A qualitative exploration of Australian women's vaccination experiences and information needs for routine, COVID-19 and respiratory syncytial virus vaccines in pregnancy\",\"authors\":\"Claire Carew ,&nbsp;Ashleigh Rak ,&nbsp;Jane Tuckerman ,&nbsp;Deborah Pidd ,&nbsp;Sophie Vasiliadis ,&nbsp;Margie Danchin ,&nbsp;Jessica Kaufman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Problem</h3><div>New maternal vaccine introduction may affect pregnant women's information needs and decision-making processes.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>The number of vaccines available to pregnant women in Australia has doubled with the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccine during the pandemic and recent approval of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study explored the maternal vaccine experiences and evolving information needs of Australian pregnant women during and since the pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This qualitative study recruited participants through social media and a Melbourne public antenatal clinic. Eligible women were either pregnant mid-pandemic (gave birth May 2021-April 2022) or pregnant post-pandemic during the study period (June 2023-March 2024). Online interviews exploring information-seeking and decision-making practices for influenza, pertussis, COVID-19, and maternal RSV vaccines were inductively thematically analysed.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>We interviewed twenty-two women with different levels of vaccine acceptance, identifying four themes: (i) “Full mother mode” to protect the baby - perceived disease risk influenced vaccine decision-making; (ii) “Fear of the unknown and comfort of the familiar” – testing and safety data on known vaccines provided confidence. More information was needed for the new RSV vaccine due to less familiarity; (iii) Whatever the provider says, “she's the professional” - providers’ recommendations and personal vaccine decisions provided reassurance; (iv) “I want time to learn about it\\\" – women preferred consistent information early in pregnancy for unhurried decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Information about new maternal vaccines like RSV should be provided early in pregnancy, emphasising vaccine testing rigour, effectiveness and safety for the baby. Consistent recommendations across providers are essential.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Midwifery\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613825001202\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613825001202","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题:引入新的孕产妇疫苗可能会影响孕妇的信息需求和决策过程。背景随着在大流行期间引入COVID-19疫苗和最近批准呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)疫苗,澳大利亚孕妇可获得的疫苗数量增加了一倍。目的本研究探讨澳大利亚孕妇在流感大流行期间和之后接种疫苗的经验和不断变化的信息需求。方法本定性研究通过社交媒体和墨尔本一家公共产前诊所招募参与者。在研究期间(2023年6月至2024年3月),符合条件的妇女要么在大流行中期怀孕(2021年5月至2022年4月分娩),要么在大流行后怀孕。探讨流感、百日咳、COVID-19和母亲RSV疫苗的信息寻求和决策实践的在线访谈进行了归纳主题分析。我们采访了22名接受疫苗程度不同的妇女,确定了四个主题:(i)保护婴儿的“全妈模式”——感知到的疾病风险影响疫苗决策;㈡“对未知的恐惧和对熟悉的安慰”——对已知疫苗的测试和安全数据提供了信心。由于不太熟悉,新的RSV疫苗需要更多的信息;(三)无论提供者说什么,“她是专业人士”——提供者的建议和个人疫苗决定提供了保证;“我需要时间了解它”-妇女希望在怀孕早期获得一致的信息,以便不慌不忙地作出决定。结论应在妊娠早期提供RSV等新型母体疫苗的相关信息,强调疫苗检测的严谨性、有效性和对婴儿的安全性。跨提供者的一致建议是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A qualitative exploration of Australian women's vaccination experiences and information needs for routine, COVID-19 and respiratory syncytial virus vaccines in pregnancy

Problem

New maternal vaccine introduction may affect pregnant women's information needs and decision-making processes.

Background

The number of vaccines available to pregnant women in Australia has doubled with the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccine during the pandemic and recent approval of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine.

Aim

This study explored the maternal vaccine experiences and evolving information needs of Australian pregnant women during and since the pandemic.

Methods

This qualitative study recruited participants through social media and a Melbourne public antenatal clinic. Eligible women were either pregnant mid-pandemic (gave birth May 2021-April 2022) or pregnant post-pandemic during the study period (June 2023-March 2024). Online interviews exploring information-seeking and decision-making practices for influenza, pertussis, COVID-19, and maternal RSV vaccines were inductively thematically analysed.

Findings

We interviewed twenty-two women with different levels of vaccine acceptance, identifying four themes: (i) “Full mother mode” to protect the baby - perceived disease risk influenced vaccine decision-making; (ii) “Fear of the unknown and comfort of the familiar” – testing and safety data on known vaccines provided confidence. More information was needed for the new RSV vaccine due to less familiarity; (iii) Whatever the provider says, “she's the professional” - providers’ recommendations and personal vaccine decisions provided reassurance; (iv) “I want time to learn about it" – women preferred consistent information early in pregnancy for unhurried decision-making.

Conclusion

Information about new maternal vaccines like RSV should be provided early in pregnancy, emphasising vaccine testing rigour, effectiveness and safety for the baby. Consistent recommendations across providers are essential.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信