美国保护开放空间优惠财产税项目及对具有农业使用资格要求的州的政策考虑

Holly F. Henderson , Urs P. Kreuter
{"title":"美国保护开放空间优惠财产税项目及对具有农业使用资格要求的州的政策考虑","authors":"Holly F. Henderson ,&nbsp;Urs P. Kreuter","doi":"10.1016/j.rala.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>Retention of privately owned open space is becoming an increasing imperative throughout the United States, particularly in densely developed regions.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>As of 2022, 35 states have adopted some form of preferential tax treatment to conserve land based solely on its environmental value.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>In 11 states, including Texas, agricultural or timber production is a prerequisite to receiving this property tax reduction, which precludes ecologically valuable, nonworking land from being conserved through preferential property tax treatment.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>We evaluated 17 states that do not necessitate agricultural or timber use and present alternative strategies to protect land based on ecological significance.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Our results provide options for possible modification of Conservation Open Space Valuation to programs that do not possess production-oriented qualification requirements.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":101057,"journal":{"name":"Rangelands","volume":"47 2","pages":"Pages 136-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conservation open space preferential property tax programs in the United States and policy considerations for states with agricultural use qualification requirements\",\"authors\":\"Holly F. Henderson ,&nbsp;Urs P. Kreuter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rala.2025.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>Retention of privately owned open space is becoming an increasing imperative throughout the United States, particularly in densely developed regions.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>As of 2022, 35 states have adopted some form of preferential tax treatment to conserve land based solely on its environmental value.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>In 11 states, including Texas, agricultural or timber production is a prerequisite to receiving this property tax reduction, which precludes ecologically valuable, nonworking land from being conserved through preferential property tax treatment.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>We evaluated 17 states that do not necessitate agricultural or timber use and present alternative strategies to protect land based on ecological significance.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Our results provide options for possible modification of Conservation Open Space Valuation to programs that do not possess production-oriented qualification requirements.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rangelands\",\"volume\":\"47 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 136-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rangelands\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019005282500001X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangelands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019005282500001X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

•在美国,保留私人拥有的开放空间正变得越来越迫切,尤其是在人口密集的发达地区。•截至2022年,35个州采用了某种形式的税收优惠待遇,仅根据其环境价值来保护土地。•在包括德克萨斯州在内的11个州,农业或木材生产是获得财产税减免的先决条件,这就排除了通过优惠财产税待遇来保护具有生态价值的非工作土地。•我们评估了17个不需要农业或木材使用的州,并根据生态意义提出了保护土地的替代战略。•我们的研究结果为不具备生产导向资格要求的项目提供了可能修改保护开放空间评估的选项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conservation open space preferential property tax programs in the United States and policy considerations for states with agricultural use qualification requirements
  • Retention of privately owned open space is becoming an increasing imperative throughout the United States, particularly in densely developed regions.
  • As of 2022, 35 states have adopted some form of preferential tax treatment to conserve land based solely on its environmental value.
  • In 11 states, including Texas, agricultural or timber production is a prerequisite to receiving this property tax reduction, which precludes ecologically valuable, nonworking land from being conserved through preferential property tax treatment.
  • We evaluated 17 states that do not necessitate agricultural or timber use and present alternative strategies to protect land based on ecological significance.
  • Our results provide options for possible modification of Conservation Open Space Valuation to programs that do not possess production-oriented qualification requirements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信