增强现实辅助手术导航下的翼髂螺钉置入安全性。

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Maximillian Y Lee, Hania Shahzad, Varun K Singh, Richard Lee Price, Frank M Phillips, Safdar N Khan
{"title":"增强现实辅助手术导航下的翼髂螺钉置入安全性。","authors":"Maximillian Y Lee, Hania Shahzad, Varun K Singh, Richard Lee Price, Frank M Phillips, Safdar N Khan","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Augmented reality (AR) technology has existed for decades but is not commonly used in spine surgery. Studies have found AR to have a good safety profile and workflow advantages over robotic navigation in pedicle screw placement. This study evaluates the safety and accuracy of AR navigation with S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw placement, an area with challenging surgical anatomy and little published research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients undergoing spine surgery involving the S2AI corridor between November 2022 and September 2024 at two large academic medical centers. Patient and screw information was collected, and radiographs and CT scans were analyzed for screw safety and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 70 screws analyzed fully penetrated the sacroiliac joint with only one screw breaching the pelvis medially and no screws breaching the greater sciatic notch. No complications were found in the S2AI corridor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The S2AI corridor contains high-risk neurovasculature. Studies have demonstrated the superiority of robotic navigation over freehand navigation in this area. AR is noninferior to robotic navigation. AR, however, has radiation exposure, workflow, and training advantages over robotic navigation. Future work should investigate patient-reported outcomes, cost-benefit, and learning curve.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"S2 Alar-Iliac Screw Insertion Safety With Augmented Reality-Assisted Surgical Navigation.\",\"authors\":\"Maximillian Y Lee, Hania Shahzad, Varun K Singh, Richard Lee Price, Frank M Phillips, Safdar N Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Augmented reality (AR) technology has existed for decades but is not commonly used in spine surgery. Studies have found AR to have a good safety profile and workflow advantages over robotic navigation in pedicle screw placement. This study evaluates the safety and accuracy of AR navigation with S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw placement, an area with challenging surgical anatomy and little published research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients undergoing spine surgery involving the S2AI corridor between November 2022 and September 2024 at two large academic medical centers. Patient and screw information was collected, and radiographs and CT scans were analyzed for screw safety and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 70 screws analyzed fully penetrated the sacroiliac joint with only one screw breaching the pelvis medially and no screws breaching the greater sciatic notch. No complications were found in the S2AI corridor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The S2AI corridor contains high-risk neurovasculature. Studies have demonstrated the superiority of robotic navigation over freehand navigation in this area. AR is noninferior to robotic navigation. AR, however, has radiation exposure, workflow, and training advantages over robotic navigation. Future work should investigate patient-reported outcomes, cost-benefit, and learning curve.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964378/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

增强现实(AR)技术已经存在了几十年,但在脊柱手术中并不常用。研究发现,与机器人导航相比,AR在椎弓根螺钉置入方面具有良好的安全性和工作流程优势。本研究评估AR导航与S2翼髂(S2AI)螺钉置入的安全性和准确性,这是一个具有挑战性的外科解剖领域,发表的研究很少。方法:回顾性分析2022年11月至2024年9月在两家大型学术医疗中心接受涉及S2AI走廊脊柱手术的患者。收集患者和螺钉信息,并分析x线片和CT扫描以确定螺钉的安全性和准确性。结果:所有70颗螺钉均完全穿透骶髂关节,仅有1颗螺钉破坏骨盆内侧,无螺钉破坏坐骨大切迹。S2AI通道无并发症。结论:S2AI走廊包含高危神经血管系统。研究表明,在这一领域,机器人导航比徒手导航具有优越性。AR不逊于机器人导航。然而,与机器人导航相比,AR具有辐射暴露、工作流程和训练方面的优势。未来的工作应该调查患者报告的结果、成本效益和学习曲线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
S2 Alar-Iliac Screw Insertion Safety With Augmented Reality-Assisted Surgical Navigation.

Introduction: Augmented reality (AR) technology has existed for decades but is not commonly used in spine surgery. Studies have found AR to have a good safety profile and workflow advantages over robotic navigation in pedicle screw placement. This study evaluates the safety and accuracy of AR navigation with S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw placement, an area with challenging surgical anatomy and little published research.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients undergoing spine surgery involving the S2AI corridor between November 2022 and September 2024 at two large academic medical centers. Patient and screw information was collected, and radiographs and CT scans were analyzed for screw safety and accuracy.

Results: All 70 screws analyzed fully penetrated the sacroiliac joint with only one screw breaching the pelvis medially and no screws breaching the greater sciatic notch. No complications were found in the S2AI corridor.

Conclusion: The S2AI corridor contains high-risk neurovasculature. Studies have demonstrated the superiority of robotic navigation over freehand navigation in this area. AR is noninferior to robotic navigation. AR, however, has radiation exposure, workflow, and training advantages over robotic navigation. Future work should investigate patient-reported outcomes, cost-benefit, and learning curve.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
282
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信