辅助抗pd -1单药治疗与观察III期足底肢黑色素瘤:一项日本患者的多中心回顾性研究

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Global Oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1200/GO-24-00644
Shigeru Koizumi, Naoya Yamazaki, Yuki Ichigozaki, Hiroshi Kitagawa, Yukiko Kiniwa, Sayuri Sato, Toshihiro Takai, Reiichi Doi, Takamichi Ito, Masahito Yasuda, Yutaka Kuwatsuka, Takeo Maekawa, Jun Asai, Takuya Miyagawa, Shigeto Matsushita, Takeru Funakoshi, Yosuke Yamamoto, Takashi Inozume, Akiko Kishi, Tatsuya Takenouchi, Hiraku Kokubu, Shusaku Ito, Yoshiyasu Umeda, Yuki Yamamoto, Shoichiro Ishizuki, Shiro Iino, Hiroshi Uchi, Tomoe Nakagawa, Kazuhiro Inafuku, Takahiro Haga, Takahide Kaneko, Masahiro Nakagawa, Hideki Kamiya, Masaru Arima, Toshihiko Hoashi, Azusa Hiura, Nobuo Kanazawa, Keiko Manabe, Masashi Ishikawa, Kenji Asagoe, Utsugi Iwasawa, Takafumi Kadono, Naohito Hatta, Shoichiro Minami, Eiji Nakano, Dai Ogata, Satoshi Fukushima, Hisashi Uhara, Kenta Nakama, Yasuhiro Nakamura
{"title":"辅助抗pd -1单药治疗与观察III期足底肢黑色素瘤:一项日本患者的多中心回顾性研究","authors":"Shigeru Koizumi, Naoya Yamazaki, Yuki Ichigozaki, Hiroshi Kitagawa, Yukiko Kiniwa, Sayuri Sato, Toshihiro Takai, Reiichi Doi, Takamichi Ito, Masahito Yasuda, Yutaka Kuwatsuka, Takeo Maekawa, Jun Asai, Takuya Miyagawa, Shigeto Matsushita, Takeru Funakoshi, Yosuke Yamamoto, Takashi Inozume, Akiko Kishi, Tatsuya Takenouchi, Hiraku Kokubu, Shusaku Ito, Yoshiyasu Umeda, Yuki Yamamoto, Shoichiro Ishizuki, Shiro Iino, Hiroshi Uchi, Tomoe Nakagawa, Kazuhiro Inafuku, Takahiro Haga, Takahide Kaneko, Masahiro Nakagawa, Hideki Kamiya, Masaru Arima, Toshihiko Hoashi, Azusa Hiura, Nobuo Kanazawa, Keiko Manabe, Masashi Ishikawa, Kenji Asagoe, Utsugi Iwasawa, Takafumi Kadono, Naohito Hatta, Shoichiro Minami, Eiji Nakano, Dai Ogata, Satoshi Fukushima, Hisashi Uhara, Kenta Nakama, Yasuhiro Nakamura","doi":"10.1200/GO-24-00644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adjuvant anti-PD-1 (adj PD-1) antibodies are extensively used to improve survival in patients with resected melanoma. Clinical trials on adj PD-1 antibodies have revealed significant improvements in recurrence-free survival (RFS); however, few of these trials have included patients with acral melanoma (AM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data were retrospectively collected from Japanese patients who underwent resection of stage III sole AM between 2014 and 2021. Survival outcomes, including RFS, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS), were compared between patients without adjuvant therapy (OBS group) and those receiving adj PD-1 group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 139 patients (OBS: 79; adj PD-1: 60), with a median follow-up of 2.6 years. The baseline characteristics were comparable, except for age and nodal metastasis. No significant differences in survival were observed between the OBS and adj PD-1 groups (3-year RFS: 36.7% <i>v</i> 27.5%, <i>P</i> = .13; 3-year DMFS: 51.0% <i>v</i> 45.3%, <i>P</i> = .51; 3-year OS: 65.3% <i>v</i> 67.4%, <i>P</i> = .45). Multivariate analysis showed no survival benefit of adj PD-1 (RFS: hazard ratio [HR], 1.25, <i>P</i> = .29; DMFS: HR, 1.03, <i>P</i> = .89; and OS: HR, 0.69, <i>P</i> = .23). Each survival outcome after propensity score matching confirmed no significant difference between the matched OBS group (n = 52) and adj PD-1 group (n = 52; 3-year RFS: 34.3% <i>v</i> 25.9%, <i>P</i> = .22; 3-year DMFS: 45.6% <i>v</i> 46.5%, <i>P</i> = .85; 3-year OS: 60.7% <i>v</i> 68.9%, <i>P</i> = .29).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adj PD-1 did not improve the prognosis in sole AM. However, further studies are essential to evaluate the efficacy of the adj anti-PD-1 antibody in AM.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"e2400644"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjuvant Anti-PD-1 Monotherapy Versus Observation for Stage III Acral Melanoma of the Sole: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in Japanese Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Shigeru Koizumi, Naoya Yamazaki, Yuki Ichigozaki, Hiroshi Kitagawa, Yukiko Kiniwa, Sayuri Sato, Toshihiro Takai, Reiichi Doi, Takamichi Ito, Masahito Yasuda, Yutaka Kuwatsuka, Takeo Maekawa, Jun Asai, Takuya Miyagawa, Shigeto Matsushita, Takeru Funakoshi, Yosuke Yamamoto, Takashi Inozume, Akiko Kishi, Tatsuya Takenouchi, Hiraku Kokubu, Shusaku Ito, Yoshiyasu Umeda, Yuki Yamamoto, Shoichiro Ishizuki, Shiro Iino, Hiroshi Uchi, Tomoe Nakagawa, Kazuhiro Inafuku, Takahiro Haga, Takahide Kaneko, Masahiro Nakagawa, Hideki Kamiya, Masaru Arima, Toshihiko Hoashi, Azusa Hiura, Nobuo Kanazawa, Keiko Manabe, Masashi Ishikawa, Kenji Asagoe, Utsugi Iwasawa, Takafumi Kadono, Naohito Hatta, Shoichiro Minami, Eiji Nakano, Dai Ogata, Satoshi Fukushima, Hisashi Uhara, Kenta Nakama, Yasuhiro Nakamura\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/GO-24-00644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adjuvant anti-PD-1 (adj PD-1) antibodies are extensively used to improve survival in patients with resected melanoma. Clinical trials on adj PD-1 antibodies have revealed significant improvements in recurrence-free survival (RFS); however, few of these trials have included patients with acral melanoma (AM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data were retrospectively collected from Japanese patients who underwent resection of stage III sole AM between 2014 and 2021. Survival outcomes, including RFS, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS), were compared between patients without adjuvant therapy (OBS group) and those receiving adj PD-1 group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 139 patients (OBS: 79; adj PD-1: 60), with a median follow-up of 2.6 years. The baseline characteristics were comparable, except for age and nodal metastasis. No significant differences in survival were observed between the OBS and adj PD-1 groups (3-year RFS: 36.7% <i>v</i> 27.5%, <i>P</i> = .13; 3-year DMFS: 51.0% <i>v</i> 45.3%, <i>P</i> = .51; 3-year OS: 65.3% <i>v</i> 67.4%, <i>P</i> = .45). Multivariate analysis showed no survival benefit of adj PD-1 (RFS: hazard ratio [HR], 1.25, <i>P</i> = .29; DMFS: HR, 1.03, <i>P</i> = .89; and OS: HR, 0.69, <i>P</i> = .23). Each survival outcome after propensity score matching confirmed no significant difference between the matched OBS group (n = 52) and adj PD-1 group (n = 52; 3-year RFS: 34.3% <i>v</i> 25.9%, <i>P</i> = .22; 3-year DMFS: 45.6% <i>v</i> 46.5%, <i>P</i> = .85; 3-year OS: 60.7% <i>v</i> 68.9%, <i>P</i> = .29).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adj PD-1 did not improve the prognosis in sole AM. However, further studies are essential to evaluate the efficacy of the adj anti-PD-1 antibody in AM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO Global Oncology\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e2400644\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004986/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO Global Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-24-00644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-24-00644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:辅助抗PD-1 (adj PD-1)抗体被广泛用于提高黑色素瘤切除术患者的生存率。临床试验显示,adj PD-1抗体显著改善无复发生存期(RFS);然而,这些试验中很少包括肢端黑色素瘤(AM)患者。方法:回顾性收集2014年至2021年期间接受III期鞋底AM切除术的日本患者的临床资料。生存结果,包括RFS,远端无转移生存(DMFS)和总生存(OS),比较无辅助治疗组(OBS组)和接受形容词PD-1组的患者。结果:本研究纳入139例患者(OBS: 79;PD-1: 60),中位随访时间为2.6年。除了年龄和淋巴结转移外,基线特征具有可比性。OBS组和adj PD-1组的生存率无显著差异(3年RFS: 36.7% vs 27.5%, P = 0.13;3年DMFS: 51.0% vs 45.3%, P = 0.51;3年OS: 65.3% vs 67.4%, P = 0.45)。多因素分析显示,adj - PD-1无生存获益(RFS:风险比[HR], 1.25, P = 0.29;Dmfs: hr, 1.03, p = 0.89;OS: HR为0.69,P = 0.23)。倾向评分匹配后的各生存结局均证实匹配的OBS组(n = 52)与adj PD-1组(n = 52;3年RFS: 34.3% vs 25.9%, P = 0.22;3年DMFS: 45.6% vs 46.5%, P = 0.85;3年OS: 60.7% vs 68.9%, P = 0.29)。结论:Adj - PD-1对单纯AM的预后无改善作用。然而,还需要进一步的研究来评估抗pd -1抗体在AM中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adjuvant Anti-PD-1 Monotherapy Versus Observation for Stage III Acral Melanoma of the Sole: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in Japanese Patients.

Purpose: Adjuvant anti-PD-1 (adj PD-1) antibodies are extensively used to improve survival in patients with resected melanoma. Clinical trials on adj PD-1 antibodies have revealed significant improvements in recurrence-free survival (RFS); however, few of these trials have included patients with acral melanoma (AM).

Methods: Clinical data were retrospectively collected from Japanese patients who underwent resection of stage III sole AM between 2014 and 2021. Survival outcomes, including RFS, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS), were compared between patients without adjuvant therapy (OBS group) and those receiving adj PD-1 group.

Results: This study included 139 patients (OBS: 79; adj PD-1: 60), with a median follow-up of 2.6 years. The baseline characteristics were comparable, except for age and nodal metastasis. No significant differences in survival were observed between the OBS and adj PD-1 groups (3-year RFS: 36.7% v 27.5%, P = .13; 3-year DMFS: 51.0% v 45.3%, P = .51; 3-year OS: 65.3% v 67.4%, P = .45). Multivariate analysis showed no survival benefit of adj PD-1 (RFS: hazard ratio [HR], 1.25, P = .29; DMFS: HR, 1.03, P = .89; and OS: HR, 0.69, P = .23). Each survival outcome after propensity score matching confirmed no significant difference between the matched OBS group (n = 52) and adj PD-1 group (n = 52; 3-year RFS: 34.3% v 25.9%, P = .22; 3-year DMFS: 45.6% v 46.5%, P = .85; 3-year OS: 60.7% v 68.9%, P = .29).

Conclusion: Adj PD-1 did not improve the prognosis in sole AM. However, further studies are essential to evaluate the efficacy of the adj anti-PD-1 antibody in AM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JCO Global Oncology
JCO Global Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
310
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信