帕金森病10年诊断的稳定性和准确性

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology Pub Date : 2025-05-13 Epub Date: 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000213499
Valtteri Räty, Tomi Kuusimäki, Joonas Majuri, Tero Vahlberg, Maria Gardberg, Tommi Noponen, Marko Seppänen, Anna-Maija Tolppanen, Valtteri Kaasinen
{"title":"帕金森病10年诊断的稳定性和准确性","authors":"Valtteri Räty, Tomi Kuusimäki, Joonas Majuri, Tero Vahlberg, Maria Gardberg, Tommi Noponen, Marko Seppänen, Anna-Maija Tolppanen, Valtteri Kaasinen","doi":"10.1212/WNL.0000000000213499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Accurate diagnosis of Parkinson disease (PD) remains challenging, with variability and clinical uncertainty, especially in nonspecialized settings. Despite advancements in diagnostic criteria and biological markers, misdiagnosis continues to affect patient care and research. This study aimed to assess the long-term diagnostic stability of PD and evaluate the accuracy of initial diagnoses over time in a large, consecutive cohort diagnosed by neurologists, with or without movement disorder specialization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective longitudinal analysis of patients diagnosed with PD between 2006 and 2020. Patient records were reviewed over a median follow-up period of 10 years, with more than half of the cohort tracked from motor symptom onset to death. Diagnostic evaluations included dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging and neuropathologic examinations for a subset of patients, based on clinical indications. Two movement disorder specialists cross-validated diagnoses through retrospective chart reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 1,626 patients (mean age 69.0 years, 44.1% female). Of these, 10.6% (n = 172) had their diagnoses revised by treating neurologists, and 2.7% (n = 44) were revised based on chart reviews or neuropathologic findings. The median time to diagnosis revision was 22 months (interquartile range = 43). The most common revised diagnoses were vascular parkinsonism, progressive supranuclear palsy, and multiple system atrophy, with 4.7% (n = 77) classified as clinically undetermined parkinsonism. In a secondary analysis separating PD and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), the revision rate increased to 17.7%. DAT imaging had been performed on 588 patients and was more frequently used in revised cases. Postmortem neuropathologic examinations had been conducted in only 3% of deceased patients, with 64% confirming the initial PD diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study demonstrates significant diagnostic instability in PD, with 13.3% of diagnoses revised, primarily within 2 years. When DLB is considered separately, the revision rate increases to 17.7%. Despite frequent DAT imaging and limited postmortem examinations, clinical uncertainty persists among practicing neurologists, contrasting with lower misdiagnosis rates in specialized centers. These findings highlight the need for systematic application of diagnostic criteria, regular reevaluation of diagnoses, more frequent autopsies, and the development of accessible diagnostic biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"104 9","pages":"e213499"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970931/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stability and Accuracy of a Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease Over 10 Years.\",\"authors\":\"Valtteri Räty, Tomi Kuusimäki, Joonas Majuri, Tero Vahlberg, Maria Gardberg, Tommi Noponen, Marko Seppänen, Anna-Maija Tolppanen, Valtteri Kaasinen\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/WNL.0000000000213499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Accurate diagnosis of Parkinson disease (PD) remains challenging, with variability and clinical uncertainty, especially in nonspecialized settings. Despite advancements in diagnostic criteria and biological markers, misdiagnosis continues to affect patient care and research. This study aimed to assess the long-term diagnostic stability of PD and evaluate the accuracy of initial diagnoses over time in a large, consecutive cohort diagnosed by neurologists, with or without movement disorder specialization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective longitudinal analysis of patients diagnosed with PD between 2006 and 2020. Patient records were reviewed over a median follow-up period of 10 years, with more than half of the cohort tracked from motor symptom onset to death. Diagnostic evaluations included dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging and neuropathologic examinations for a subset of patients, based on clinical indications. Two movement disorder specialists cross-validated diagnoses through retrospective chart reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 1,626 patients (mean age 69.0 years, 44.1% female). Of these, 10.6% (n = 172) had their diagnoses revised by treating neurologists, and 2.7% (n = 44) were revised based on chart reviews or neuropathologic findings. The median time to diagnosis revision was 22 months (interquartile range = 43). The most common revised diagnoses were vascular parkinsonism, progressive supranuclear palsy, and multiple system atrophy, with 4.7% (n = 77) classified as clinically undetermined parkinsonism. In a secondary analysis separating PD and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), the revision rate increased to 17.7%. DAT imaging had been performed on 588 patients and was more frequently used in revised cases. Postmortem neuropathologic examinations had been conducted in only 3% of deceased patients, with 64% confirming the initial PD diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study demonstrates significant diagnostic instability in PD, with 13.3% of diagnoses revised, primarily within 2 years. When DLB is considered separately, the revision rate increases to 17.7%. Despite frequent DAT imaging and limited postmortem examinations, clinical uncertainty persists among practicing neurologists, contrasting with lower misdiagnosis rates in specialized centers. These findings highlight the need for systematic application of diagnostic criteria, regular reevaluation of diagnoses, more frequent autopsies, and the development of accessible diagnostic biomarkers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology\",\"volume\":\"104 9\",\"pages\":\"e213499\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970931/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000213499\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000213499","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:帕金森病(PD)的准确诊断仍然具有挑战性,具有可变性和临床不确定性,特别是在非专业环境中。尽管在诊断标准和生物标记方面取得了进步,但误诊继续影响着患者的护理和研究。本研究旨在评估PD的长期诊断稳定性,并在一个大型连续队列中评估初始诊断的准确性,该队列由神经科医生诊断,有或没有运动障碍专业。方法:我们对2006年至2020年间诊断为PD的患者进行了回顾性纵向分析。在中位随访期为10年的患者记录中,超过一半的队列从运动症状发作到死亡。诊断评估包括根据临床适应症对一部分患者进行多巴胺转运蛋白(DAT)成像和神经病理学检查。两名运动障碍专家通过回顾性图表回顾交叉验证诊断。结果:纳入1626例患者(平均年龄69.0岁,女性44.1%)。其中,10.6% (n = 172)的诊断通过治疗神经科医生进行了修改,2.7% (n = 44)的诊断根据病历回顾或神经病理结果进行了修改。到诊断修订的中位时间为22个月(四分位数间距= 43)。最常见的修订诊断为血管性帕金森病、进行性核上性麻痹和多系统萎缩,其中4.7% (n = 77)被归类为临床未确定的帕金森病。在将PD和痴呆与路易体(DLB)分开的二次分析中,修正率增加到17.7%。在588例患者中进行了DAT成像,并且更常用于修订病例。只有3%的死亡患者进行了死后神经病理学检查,其中64%的患者确认了PD的初步诊断。讨论:本研究显示PD的诊断有明显的不稳定性,13.3%的诊断被修改,主要是在2年内。如果单独考虑DLB,修正率上升到17.7%。尽管频繁的DAT成像和有限的死后检查,临床不确定性仍然存在于执业神经病学家中,与专业中心较低的误诊率形成对比。这些发现强调了系统应用诊断标准、定期重新评估诊断、更频繁的尸检和开发可获得的诊断生物标志物的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stability and Accuracy of a Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease Over 10 Years.

Background and objectives: Accurate diagnosis of Parkinson disease (PD) remains challenging, with variability and clinical uncertainty, especially in nonspecialized settings. Despite advancements in diagnostic criteria and biological markers, misdiagnosis continues to affect patient care and research. This study aimed to assess the long-term diagnostic stability of PD and evaluate the accuracy of initial diagnoses over time in a large, consecutive cohort diagnosed by neurologists, with or without movement disorder specialization.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective longitudinal analysis of patients diagnosed with PD between 2006 and 2020. Patient records were reviewed over a median follow-up period of 10 years, with more than half of the cohort tracked from motor symptom onset to death. Diagnostic evaluations included dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging and neuropathologic examinations for a subset of patients, based on clinical indications. Two movement disorder specialists cross-validated diagnoses through retrospective chart reviews.

Results: The cohort included 1,626 patients (mean age 69.0 years, 44.1% female). Of these, 10.6% (n = 172) had their diagnoses revised by treating neurologists, and 2.7% (n = 44) were revised based on chart reviews or neuropathologic findings. The median time to diagnosis revision was 22 months (interquartile range = 43). The most common revised diagnoses were vascular parkinsonism, progressive supranuclear palsy, and multiple system atrophy, with 4.7% (n = 77) classified as clinically undetermined parkinsonism. In a secondary analysis separating PD and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), the revision rate increased to 17.7%. DAT imaging had been performed on 588 patients and was more frequently used in revised cases. Postmortem neuropathologic examinations had been conducted in only 3% of deceased patients, with 64% confirming the initial PD diagnosis.

Discussion: This study demonstrates significant diagnostic instability in PD, with 13.3% of diagnoses revised, primarily within 2 years. When DLB is considered separately, the revision rate increases to 17.7%. Despite frequent DAT imaging and limited postmortem examinations, clinical uncertainty persists among practicing neurologists, contrasting with lower misdiagnosis rates in specialized centers. These findings highlight the need for systematic application of diagnostic criteria, regular reevaluation of diagnoses, more frequent autopsies, and the development of accessible diagnostic biomarkers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology
Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1973
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology. As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content. Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信