农林业对越南农户生计的潜在多方面影响:需要考虑农林业的类型、规模和成熟度,以便进行无偏见的评估

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Thi Thanh Thuong Dang, Kai Mausch, Mai Phuong Nguyen, Ingrid Öborn, Sigrun Dahlin, Nguyen La, Paolo Sckokai, Pierre Chopin
{"title":"农林业对越南农户生计的潜在多方面影响:需要考虑农林业的类型、规模和成熟度,以便进行无偏见的评估","authors":"Thi Thanh Thuong Dang,&nbsp;Kai Mausch,&nbsp;Mai Phuong Nguyen,&nbsp;Ingrid Öborn,&nbsp;Sigrun Dahlin,&nbsp;Nguyen La,&nbsp;Paolo Sckokai,&nbsp;Pierre Chopin","doi":"10.1007/s10457-025-01170-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Agroforestry is widely recommended in the mountainous areas of Southeast Asia to improve farmers’ livelihoods and reverse current land degradation trends. However, studies of the impacts of adoption of agroforestry practices on smallholder farmer livelihoods are limited to field-scale assessments and landscape potential. In this paper, we assess the difference in terms of farming system performance between agroforestry adopters and non-adopters in northwest Viet Nam using propensity score matching (PSM) calculating the average treatment (agroforestry adoption) effect on the treated (adopters) on core economic, environmental, and social indicators. The results of the PSM indicate an increase in revenues of about 8 million VND ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (about 325$) per household when adopting agroforestry, but a counterintuitive outcome regarding erosion. This outcome is likely due to an improperly selected farmer control group, which is located on less erosion-prone land, as well as the presence of immature trees in agroforestry systems, whose canopies have not yet contributed to reducing erosion. A typology of adopters was produced and revealed a wide diversity of agroforestry adoption pathways across the population, which may have blurred the results of the PSM. Six farming household types were obtained ranging from ‘Off-farm income-dependent farmers’ with low proportion of agroforestry to ‘Specialists mixed agroforesters’ with higher proportion of agroforestry practices on their farm and different levels of input intensity in their farming systems. This typology highlights the need for greater context awareness in farming system research and proper control of the agroforestry type, the proportion of agroforestry in the farming systems, and the maturity of the agroforestry system. This will help to better capture the real-life, farm-scale impacts of agroforestry practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"99 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-025-01170-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential multifaceted agroforestry impacts on farming household’s livelihoods in Viet Nam: need to account for agroforestry type, magnitude and maturity for non-biased evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Thi Thanh Thuong Dang,&nbsp;Kai Mausch,&nbsp;Mai Phuong Nguyen,&nbsp;Ingrid Öborn,&nbsp;Sigrun Dahlin,&nbsp;Nguyen La,&nbsp;Paolo Sckokai,&nbsp;Pierre Chopin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10457-025-01170-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Agroforestry is widely recommended in the mountainous areas of Southeast Asia to improve farmers’ livelihoods and reverse current land degradation trends. However, studies of the impacts of adoption of agroforestry practices on smallholder farmer livelihoods are limited to field-scale assessments and landscape potential. In this paper, we assess the difference in terms of farming system performance between agroforestry adopters and non-adopters in northwest Viet Nam using propensity score matching (PSM) calculating the average treatment (agroforestry adoption) effect on the treated (adopters) on core economic, environmental, and social indicators. The results of the PSM indicate an increase in revenues of about 8 million VND ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (about 325$) per household when adopting agroforestry, but a counterintuitive outcome regarding erosion. This outcome is likely due to an improperly selected farmer control group, which is located on less erosion-prone land, as well as the presence of immature trees in agroforestry systems, whose canopies have not yet contributed to reducing erosion. A typology of adopters was produced and revealed a wide diversity of agroforestry adoption pathways across the population, which may have blurred the results of the PSM. Six farming household types were obtained ranging from ‘Off-farm income-dependent farmers’ with low proportion of agroforestry to ‘Specialists mixed agroforesters’ with higher proportion of agroforestry practices on their farm and different levels of input intensity in their farming systems. This typology highlights the need for greater context awareness in farming system research and proper control of the agroforestry type, the proportion of agroforestry in the farming systems, and the maturity of the agroforestry system. This will help to better capture the real-life, farm-scale impacts of agroforestry practices.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agroforestry Systems\",\"volume\":\"99 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-025-01170-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agroforestry Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01170-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01170-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在东南亚山区,农林业被广泛推荐用于改善农民的生计和扭转目前的土地退化趋势。然而,关于采用农林业做法对小农生计的影响的研究仅限于实地规模的评估和景观潜力。在本文中,我们利用倾向得分匹配(PSM)来评估越南西北部农林业采用者和非采用者在农业系统绩效方面的差异,计算了核心经济、环境和社会指标上的平均处理(农林业采用者)对处理(采用者)的影响。PSM的结果表明,采用农林业后,每户收入增加约800万越南盾公顷- 1年(约325美元),但在侵蚀方面的结果与直觉相反。造成这一结果的原因可能是选择不当的农民控制组,他们位于不易发生侵蚀的土地上,以及农林业系统中存在未成熟的树木,其树冠尚未有助于减少侵蚀。对采用者进行了分类,并揭示了整个人口中农林业采用途径的广泛多样性,这可能模糊了PSM的结果。获得了六种农户类型,从农林业比例较低的“依赖非农收入的农民”到农林业比例较高的“专业混合农林业农户”,其农业系统的投入强度不同。这种类型强调了在农业系统研究和适当控制农林业类型、农林业在农业系统中的比例以及农林业系统的成熟度方面需要更大的背景意识。这将有助于更好地捕捉农林业实践的实际农场规模影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Potential multifaceted agroforestry impacts on farming household’s livelihoods in Viet Nam: need to account for agroforestry type, magnitude and maturity for non-biased evaluation

Agroforestry is widely recommended in the mountainous areas of Southeast Asia to improve farmers’ livelihoods and reverse current land degradation trends. However, studies of the impacts of adoption of agroforestry practices on smallholder farmer livelihoods are limited to field-scale assessments and landscape potential. In this paper, we assess the difference in terms of farming system performance between agroforestry adopters and non-adopters in northwest Viet Nam using propensity score matching (PSM) calculating the average treatment (agroforestry adoption) effect on the treated (adopters) on core economic, environmental, and social indicators. The results of the PSM indicate an increase in revenues of about 8 million VND ha−1 yr−1 (about 325$) per household when adopting agroforestry, but a counterintuitive outcome regarding erosion. This outcome is likely due to an improperly selected farmer control group, which is located on less erosion-prone land, as well as the presence of immature trees in agroforestry systems, whose canopies have not yet contributed to reducing erosion. A typology of adopters was produced and revealed a wide diversity of agroforestry adoption pathways across the population, which may have blurred the results of the PSM. Six farming household types were obtained ranging from ‘Off-farm income-dependent farmers’ with low proportion of agroforestry to ‘Specialists mixed agroforesters’ with higher proportion of agroforestry practices on their farm and different levels of input intensity in their farming systems. This typology highlights the need for greater context awareness in farming system research and proper control of the agroforestry type, the proportion of agroforestry in the farming systems, and the maturity of the agroforestry system. This will help to better capture the real-life, farm-scale impacts of agroforestry practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信