Thi Thanh Thuong Dang, Kai Mausch, Mai Phuong Nguyen, Ingrid Öborn, Sigrun Dahlin, Nguyen La, Paolo Sckokai, Pierre Chopin
{"title":"农林业对越南农户生计的潜在多方面影响:需要考虑农林业的类型、规模和成熟度,以便进行无偏见的评估","authors":"Thi Thanh Thuong Dang, Kai Mausch, Mai Phuong Nguyen, Ingrid Öborn, Sigrun Dahlin, Nguyen La, Paolo Sckokai, Pierre Chopin","doi":"10.1007/s10457-025-01170-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Agroforestry is widely recommended in the mountainous areas of Southeast Asia to improve farmers’ livelihoods and reverse current land degradation trends. However, studies of the impacts of adoption of agroforestry practices on smallholder farmer livelihoods are limited to field-scale assessments and landscape potential. In this paper, we assess the difference in terms of farming system performance between agroforestry adopters and non-adopters in northwest Viet Nam using propensity score matching (PSM) calculating the average treatment (agroforestry adoption) effect on the treated (adopters) on core economic, environmental, and social indicators. The results of the PSM indicate an increase in revenues of about 8 million VND ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (about 325$) per household when adopting agroforestry, but a counterintuitive outcome regarding erosion. This outcome is likely due to an improperly selected farmer control group, which is located on less erosion-prone land, as well as the presence of immature trees in agroforestry systems, whose canopies have not yet contributed to reducing erosion. A typology of adopters was produced and revealed a wide diversity of agroforestry adoption pathways across the population, which may have blurred the results of the PSM. Six farming household types were obtained ranging from ‘Off-farm income-dependent farmers’ with low proportion of agroforestry to ‘Specialists mixed agroforesters’ with higher proportion of agroforestry practices on their farm and different levels of input intensity in their farming systems. This typology highlights the need for greater context awareness in farming system research and proper control of the agroforestry type, the proportion of agroforestry in the farming systems, and the maturity of the agroforestry system. This will help to better capture the real-life, farm-scale impacts of agroforestry practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"99 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-025-01170-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential multifaceted agroforestry impacts on farming household’s livelihoods in Viet Nam: need to account for agroforestry type, magnitude and maturity for non-biased evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Thi Thanh Thuong Dang, Kai Mausch, Mai Phuong Nguyen, Ingrid Öborn, Sigrun Dahlin, Nguyen La, Paolo Sckokai, Pierre Chopin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10457-025-01170-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Agroforestry is widely recommended in the mountainous areas of Southeast Asia to improve farmers’ livelihoods and reverse current land degradation trends. However, studies of the impacts of adoption of agroforestry practices on smallholder farmer livelihoods are limited to field-scale assessments and landscape potential. In this paper, we assess the difference in terms of farming system performance between agroforestry adopters and non-adopters in northwest Viet Nam using propensity score matching (PSM) calculating the average treatment (agroforestry adoption) effect on the treated (adopters) on core economic, environmental, and social indicators. The results of the PSM indicate an increase in revenues of about 8 million VND ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (about 325$) per household when adopting agroforestry, but a counterintuitive outcome regarding erosion. This outcome is likely due to an improperly selected farmer control group, which is located on less erosion-prone land, as well as the presence of immature trees in agroforestry systems, whose canopies have not yet contributed to reducing erosion. A typology of adopters was produced and revealed a wide diversity of agroforestry adoption pathways across the population, which may have blurred the results of the PSM. Six farming household types were obtained ranging from ‘Off-farm income-dependent farmers’ with low proportion of agroforestry to ‘Specialists mixed agroforesters’ with higher proportion of agroforestry practices on their farm and different levels of input intensity in their farming systems. This typology highlights the need for greater context awareness in farming system research and proper control of the agroforestry type, the proportion of agroforestry in the farming systems, and the maturity of the agroforestry system. This will help to better capture the real-life, farm-scale impacts of agroforestry practices.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agroforestry Systems\",\"volume\":\"99 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-025-01170-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agroforestry Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01170-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01170-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Potential multifaceted agroforestry impacts on farming household’s livelihoods in Viet Nam: need to account for agroforestry type, magnitude and maturity for non-biased evaluation
Agroforestry is widely recommended in the mountainous areas of Southeast Asia to improve farmers’ livelihoods and reverse current land degradation trends. However, studies of the impacts of adoption of agroforestry practices on smallholder farmer livelihoods are limited to field-scale assessments and landscape potential. In this paper, we assess the difference in terms of farming system performance between agroforestry adopters and non-adopters in northwest Viet Nam using propensity score matching (PSM) calculating the average treatment (agroforestry adoption) effect on the treated (adopters) on core economic, environmental, and social indicators. The results of the PSM indicate an increase in revenues of about 8 million VND ha−1 yr−1 (about 325$) per household when adopting agroforestry, but a counterintuitive outcome regarding erosion. This outcome is likely due to an improperly selected farmer control group, which is located on less erosion-prone land, as well as the presence of immature trees in agroforestry systems, whose canopies have not yet contributed to reducing erosion. A typology of adopters was produced and revealed a wide diversity of agroforestry adoption pathways across the population, which may have blurred the results of the PSM. Six farming household types were obtained ranging from ‘Off-farm income-dependent farmers’ with low proportion of agroforestry to ‘Specialists mixed agroforesters’ with higher proportion of agroforestry practices on their farm and different levels of input intensity in their farming systems. This typology highlights the need for greater context awareness in farming system research and proper control of the agroforestry type, the proportion of agroforestry in the farming systems, and the maturity of the agroforestry system. This will help to better capture the real-life, farm-scale impacts of agroforestry practices.
期刊介绍:
Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base