基于注意力的混合深度学习模型及其在心血管疾病风险分层中的科学验证

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Mrinalini Bhagawati , Siddharth Gupta , Sudip Paul , Laura Mantella , Amer M. Johri , John R. Laird , Ekta Tiwari , Narendra N. Khanna , Andrew Nicolaides , Rajesh Singh , Mustafa Al-Maini , Luca Saba , Jasjit S. Suri
{"title":"基于注意力的混合深度学习模型及其在心血管疾病风险分层中的科学验证","authors":"Mrinalini Bhagawati ,&nbsp;Siddharth Gupta ,&nbsp;Sudip Paul ,&nbsp;Laura Mantella ,&nbsp;Amer M. Johri ,&nbsp;John R. Laird ,&nbsp;Ekta Tiwari ,&nbsp;Narendra N. Khanna ,&nbsp;Andrew Nicolaides ,&nbsp;Rajesh Singh ,&nbsp;Mustafa Al-Maini ,&nbsp;Luca Saba ,&nbsp;Jasjit S. Suri","doi":"10.1016/j.bspc.2025.107824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Carotid plaque can be used to predict the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Earlier machine learning solutions were not reliable, or accurate. The authors hypothesize that (i) attention-based unidirectional or bidirectional hybrid deep learning (HDL) is superior to non-attention-based unidirectional or bidirectional hybrid deep learning and (ii) attention-based bidirectional hybrid deep learning models are superior to attention-based unidirectional HDL paradigms. The proposed design, AtheroEdge™ 3.0<sub>att-HDL</sub> (AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA), shows how effectively characteristics of the carotid plaque in attention-based hybrid deep learning systems predict the risk of CVD more accurately and reliably.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>The study involved 500 participants who underwent targeted carotid B-mode ultrasonography along with coronary angiography. Six hybrid models (four attention types) were used, totaling 6x4 = 24 models. These were benchmarked against the machine learning models. Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test, Wilcoxon test, and paired <em>T</em>-test were used for the statistical and reliability tests. The scientific validation was performed using the unseen data. The area-under-the-curve and p-values were used for the performance evaluation of AtheroEdge™ 3.0<sub>att-HDL</sub>.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The best attention-based bidirectional HDL model showed a mean improvement of <strong>36.11 %</strong>, <strong>5.37 %</strong>, <strong>5.37 %</strong>, and <strong>1.04 %</strong> over Random Forest, unidirectional LSTM, bidirectional LSTM, and best attention-based unidirectional HDL models, respectively. As per the reliability and statistical test findings, the bidirectional AtheroEdge™ 3.0<sub>att-HDL</sub> had a p-value of less than 0.001, while the unidirectional AtheroEdge™ 3.0<sub>att-HDL</sub> also complied with regulations having a p-value &lt; 0.005.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The hypothesis was scientifically validated, assessed for reliability and stability, and deemed suitable for clinical application.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55362,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 107824"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attention-based hybrid deep learning models and its scientific validation for cardiovascular disease risk stratification\",\"authors\":\"Mrinalini Bhagawati ,&nbsp;Siddharth Gupta ,&nbsp;Sudip Paul ,&nbsp;Laura Mantella ,&nbsp;Amer M. Johri ,&nbsp;John R. Laird ,&nbsp;Ekta Tiwari ,&nbsp;Narendra N. Khanna ,&nbsp;Andrew Nicolaides ,&nbsp;Rajesh Singh ,&nbsp;Mustafa Al-Maini ,&nbsp;Luca Saba ,&nbsp;Jasjit S. Suri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bspc.2025.107824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Carotid plaque can be used to predict the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Earlier machine learning solutions were not reliable, or accurate. The authors hypothesize that (i) attention-based unidirectional or bidirectional hybrid deep learning (HDL) is superior to non-attention-based unidirectional or bidirectional hybrid deep learning and (ii) attention-based bidirectional hybrid deep learning models are superior to attention-based unidirectional HDL paradigms. The proposed design, AtheroEdge™ 3.0<sub>att-HDL</sub> (AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA), shows how effectively characteristics of the carotid plaque in attention-based hybrid deep learning systems predict the risk of CVD more accurately and reliably.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>The study involved 500 participants who underwent targeted carotid B-mode ultrasonography along with coronary angiography. Six hybrid models (four attention types) were used, totaling 6x4 = 24 models. These were benchmarked against the machine learning models. Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test, Wilcoxon test, and paired <em>T</em>-test were used for the statistical and reliability tests. The scientific validation was performed using the unseen data. The area-under-the-curve and p-values were used for the performance evaluation of AtheroEdge™ 3.0<sub>att-HDL</sub>.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The best attention-based bidirectional HDL model showed a mean improvement of <strong>36.11 %</strong>, <strong>5.37 %</strong>, <strong>5.37 %</strong>, and <strong>1.04 %</strong> over Random Forest, unidirectional LSTM, bidirectional LSTM, and best attention-based unidirectional HDL models, respectively. As per the reliability and statistical test findings, the bidirectional AtheroEdge™ 3.0<sub>att-HDL</sub> had a p-value of less than 0.001, while the unidirectional AtheroEdge™ 3.0<sub>att-HDL</sub> also complied with regulations having a p-value &lt; 0.005.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The hypothesis was scientifically validated, assessed for reliability and stability, and deemed suitable for clinical application.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control\",\"volume\":\"108 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107824\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746809425003350\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746809425003350","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景颈动脉斑块可用于预测心血管疾病(CVD)的风险。早期的机器学习解决方案不可靠,也不准确。作者假设:(i)基于注意的单向或双向混合深度学习(HDL)优于非基于注意的单向或双向混合深度学习;(ii)基于注意的双向混合深度学习模型优于基于注意的单向HDL范式。提出的设计AtheroEdge™3.0at - hdl (atheropopoint™,Roseville, CA, USA)显示了基于注意力的混合深度学习系统如何有效地预测颈动脉斑块的特征,更准确、更可靠地预测心血管疾病的风险。方法:500名受试者接受了颈动脉b超和冠状动脉造影检查。采用6个混合模型(4种注意类型),共6x4 = 24个模型。这些都是根据机器学习模型进行基准测试的。统计检验和信度检验采用Mann-Whitney U检验、Wilcoxon检验和配对t检验。科学验证是使用未见过的数据进行的。曲线下面积和p值用于AtheroEdge™3.0att-HDL的性能评估。结果基于注意力的最佳双向HDL模型比随机森林模型、单向LSTM模型、双向LSTM模型和最佳基于注意力的单向HDL模型分别平均提高36.11%、5.37%、5.37%和1.04%。根据可靠性和统计检验结果,双向AtheroEdge™3.0att-HDL的p值小于0.001,而单向AtheroEdge™3.0att-HDL也符合p值为<的规定;0.005.结论该假设经过科学验证,可靠性和稳定性评价,适合临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attention-based hybrid deep learning models and its scientific validation for cardiovascular disease risk stratification

Background

Carotid plaque can be used to predict the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Earlier machine learning solutions were not reliable, or accurate. The authors hypothesize that (i) attention-based unidirectional or bidirectional hybrid deep learning (HDL) is superior to non-attention-based unidirectional or bidirectional hybrid deep learning and (ii) attention-based bidirectional hybrid deep learning models are superior to attention-based unidirectional HDL paradigms. The proposed design, AtheroEdge™ 3.0att-HDL (AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA), shows how effectively characteristics of the carotid plaque in attention-based hybrid deep learning systems predict the risk of CVD more accurately and reliably.

Methodology

The study involved 500 participants who underwent targeted carotid B-mode ultrasonography along with coronary angiography. Six hybrid models (four attention types) were used, totaling 6x4 = 24 models. These were benchmarked against the machine learning models. Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon test, and paired T-test were used for the statistical and reliability tests. The scientific validation was performed using the unseen data. The area-under-the-curve and p-values were used for the performance evaluation of AtheroEdge™ 3.0att-HDL.

Results

The best attention-based bidirectional HDL model showed a mean improvement of 36.11 %, 5.37 %, 5.37 %, and 1.04 % over Random Forest, unidirectional LSTM, bidirectional LSTM, and best attention-based unidirectional HDL models, respectively. As per the reliability and statistical test findings, the bidirectional AtheroEdge™ 3.0att-HDL had a p-value of less than 0.001, while the unidirectional AtheroEdge™ 3.0att-HDL also complied with regulations having a p-value < 0.005.

Conclusions

The hypothesis was scientifically validated, assessed for reliability and stability, and deemed suitable for clinical application.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
13.70%
发文量
822
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Biomedical Signal Processing and Control aims to provide a cross-disciplinary international forum for the interchange of information on research in the measurement and analysis of signals and images in clinical medicine and the biological sciences. Emphasis is placed on contributions dealing with the practical, applications-led research on the use of methods and devices in clinical diagnosis, patient monitoring and management. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control reflects the main areas in which these methods are being used and developed at the interface of both engineering and clinical science. The scope of the journal is defined to include relevant review papers, technical notes, short communications and letters. Tutorial papers and special issues will also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信