护理人员早期休克识别的准确性:日本一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。

Rina Tanohata, Katsutoshi Saito, Takehiko Nagano, Hidenobu Ochiai
{"title":"护理人员早期休克识别的准确性:日本一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Rina Tanohata, Katsutoshi Saito, Takehiko Nagano, Hidenobu Ochiai","doi":"10.2185/jrm.2024-053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Early recognition of shock status by paramedics significantly affects patient prognosis; however, its accuracy remains unclear. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of paramedics in classifying shock and the characteristics of misdiagnoses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This multicenter prospective observational study compared the on-scene shock diagnoses of paramedics between July 2022 and June 2023 with those of physicians upon hospital arrival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall diagnostic accuracy for shock revealed substantial agreement (k=0.64), whereas diagnosis by category ranged from slight to moderate agreement (k=0.11-0.51). Patients without systolic hypotension were more frequently missed during diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enhanced clinical education is needed to improve the accuracy of shock diagnosis by paramedics.</p>","PeriodicalId":73939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rural medicine : JRM","volume":"20 2","pages":"125-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11962191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of early shock recognition by paramedics: a multicenter prospective observational study in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Rina Tanohata, Katsutoshi Saito, Takehiko Nagano, Hidenobu Ochiai\",\"doi\":\"10.2185/jrm.2024-053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Early recognition of shock status by paramedics significantly affects patient prognosis; however, its accuracy remains unclear. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of paramedics in classifying shock and the characteristics of misdiagnoses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This multicenter prospective observational study compared the on-scene shock diagnoses of paramedics between July 2022 and June 2023 with those of physicians upon hospital arrival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall diagnostic accuracy for shock revealed substantial agreement (k=0.64), whereas diagnosis by category ranged from slight to moderate agreement (k=0.11-0.51). Patients without systolic hypotension were more frequently missed during diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enhanced clinical education is needed to improve the accuracy of shock diagnosis by paramedics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of rural medicine : JRM\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"125-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11962191/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of rural medicine : JRM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2185/jrm.2024-053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rural medicine : JRM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2185/jrm.2024-053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:护理人员对休克状态的早期识别对患者预后有重要影响;然而,其准确性尚不清楚。本研究评估护理人员对休克分类的诊断准确性及误诊的特点。材料和方法:本多中心前瞻性观察研究比较了2022年7月至2023年6月期间护理人员的现场休克诊断与到达医院时医生的诊断。结果:休克的总体诊断准确性显示了实质性的一致性(k=0.64),而分类诊断的一致性范围从轻微到中度(k=0.11-0.51)。无收缩期低血压的患者在诊断时更容易漏诊。结论:需要加强临床教育,提高护理人员对休克的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of early shock recognition by paramedics: a multicenter prospective observational study in Japan.

Objective: Early recognition of shock status by paramedics significantly affects patient prognosis; however, its accuracy remains unclear. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of paramedics in classifying shock and the characteristics of misdiagnoses.

Materials and methods: This multicenter prospective observational study compared the on-scene shock diagnoses of paramedics between July 2022 and June 2023 with those of physicians upon hospital arrival.

Results: The overall diagnostic accuracy for shock revealed substantial agreement (k=0.64), whereas diagnosis by category ranged from slight to moderate agreement (k=0.11-0.51). Patients without systolic hypotension were more frequently missed during diagnosis.

Conclusions: Enhanced clinical education is needed to improve the accuracy of shock diagnosis by paramedics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信