南非创伤性脊髓损伤患者的社区重新融入模式:过程和结果。

0 REHABILITATION
Advances in rehabilitation science and practice Pub Date : 2025-04-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536351251326797
Eugene Nizeyimana, Quinette Louw, Conran Joseph
{"title":"南非创伤性脊髓损伤患者的社区重新融入模式:过程和结果。","authors":"Eugene Nizeyimana, Quinette Louw, Conran Joseph","doi":"10.1177/27536351251326797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic spinal cord injury impacts physical functioning, independence, and quality of life. The high incidence rate of 75.6 per million in South Africa indicate the crucial role of successful community reintegration. Despite South African's policy emphasizing comprehensive rehabilitation of persons with disabilities, community reintegration following spinal cord injury remains inadequate.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a multidimensional model to improve community reintegration for individuals with traumatic spinal cord injuries in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 4-phase mixed methods study was employed. Phase 1 used a cross-sectional survey of 108 individuals with spinal cord injuries to investigate levels and factors influencing psychosocial and community reintegration. Phase 2 involved 28 qualitative interviews with different content experts, including individuals with spinal cord injuries, caregivers, rehabilitation professionals, and persons representing people with disabilities in the communities. Phase 3 reviewed existing community reintegration programs, while Phase 4 used a Delphi technique with 10 experts to design and refine program components and strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed low levels of psychosocial and community reintegration, influenced by employment and housing factors. Content experts highlighted barriers such as inaccessible environments, transportation challenges, and negative societal attitudes. Program components included technological support, employment assistance, mentorship, and recreational activities. The first 3 phases informed a development of a 3-level model addressing client, community, and legislative domains. In the fourth phase, experts reached consensus on components and strategies to achieve this multi-level community reintegration model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evidence-based community reintegration model offers a structured, multi-level framework to address reintegration challenges in South Africa. It emphasizes coordinated interventions at individual, community, and policy levels to improve outcomes for individuals with traumatic spinal cord injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":72107,"journal":{"name":"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice","volume":"14 ","pages":"27536351251326797"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967211/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Community Reintegration Model for Persons With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in South Africa: Process and Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Eugene Nizeyimana, Quinette Louw, Conran Joseph\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27536351251326797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic spinal cord injury impacts physical functioning, independence, and quality of life. The high incidence rate of 75.6 per million in South Africa indicate the crucial role of successful community reintegration. Despite South African's policy emphasizing comprehensive rehabilitation of persons with disabilities, community reintegration following spinal cord injury remains inadequate.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a multidimensional model to improve community reintegration for individuals with traumatic spinal cord injuries in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 4-phase mixed methods study was employed. Phase 1 used a cross-sectional survey of 108 individuals with spinal cord injuries to investigate levels and factors influencing psychosocial and community reintegration. Phase 2 involved 28 qualitative interviews with different content experts, including individuals with spinal cord injuries, caregivers, rehabilitation professionals, and persons representing people with disabilities in the communities. Phase 3 reviewed existing community reintegration programs, while Phase 4 used a Delphi technique with 10 experts to design and refine program components and strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed low levels of psychosocial and community reintegration, influenced by employment and housing factors. Content experts highlighted barriers such as inaccessible environments, transportation challenges, and negative societal attitudes. Program components included technological support, employment assistance, mentorship, and recreational activities. The first 3 phases informed a development of a 3-level model addressing client, community, and legislative domains. In the fourth phase, experts reached consensus on components and strategies to achieve this multi-level community reintegration model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evidence-based community reintegration model offers a structured, multi-level framework to address reintegration challenges in South Africa. It emphasizes coordinated interventions at individual, community, and policy levels to improve outcomes for individuals with traumatic spinal cord injuries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"27536351251326797\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967211/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536351251326797\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536351251326797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:创伤性脊髓损伤影响身体功能、独立性和生活质量。南非每百万人中有75.6%的高发病率表明成功地重新融入社区的关键作用。尽管南非的政策强调残疾人的全面康复,但脊髓损伤后的社区重新融入仍然不足。目的:开发一个多维模型,以改善南非创伤性脊髓损伤患者的社区重新融入。方法:采用四期混合方法进行研究。第一阶段对108名脊髓损伤患者进行了横断面调查,以调查影响社会心理和社区重新融入的水平和因素。第二阶段包括28个与不同内容专家的定性访谈,包括脊髓损伤患者、护理人员、康复专业人员和社区残疾人代表。第三阶段回顾了现有的社区重返社会项目,而第四阶段则与10名专家一起使用德尔菲技术来设计和完善项目的组成部分和策略。结果:研究显示,受就业和住房因素影响,社会心理和社区重新融入水平较低。内容专家强调了无障碍环境、交通挑战和负面的社会态度等障碍。项目内容包括技术支持、就业援助、指导和娱乐活动。前3个阶段介绍了解决客户、社区和立法领域的3层模型的开发。在第四阶段,专家们就实现这一多层次社区重新融合模式的组成部分和战略达成了共识。结论:基于证据的社区重返社会模式为解决南非重返社会的挑战提供了一个结构化的、多层次的框架。它强调个人、社区和政策层面的协调干预,以改善创伤性脊髓损伤患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Community Reintegration Model for Persons With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in South Africa: Process and Outcomes.

A Community Reintegration Model for Persons With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in South Africa: Process and Outcomes.

A Community Reintegration Model for Persons With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in South Africa: Process and Outcomes.

A Community Reintegration Model for Persons With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in South Africa: Process and Outcomes.

Background: Traumatic spinal cord injury impacts physical functioning, independence, and quality of life. The high incidence rate of 75.6 per million in South Africa indicate the crucial role of successful community reintegration. Despite South African's policy emphasizing comprehensive rehabilitation of persons with disabilities, community reintegration following spinal cord injury remains inadequate.

Objective: To develop a multidimensional model to improve community reintegration for individuals with traumatic spinal cord injuries in South Africa.

Methods: A 4-phase mixed methods study was employed. Phase 1 used a cross-sectional survey of 108 individuals with spinal cord injuries to investigate levels and factors influencing psychosocial and community reintegration. Phase 2 involved 28 qualitative interviews with different content experts, including individuals with spinal cord injuries, caregivers, rehabilitation professionals, and persons representing people with disabilities in the communities. Phase 3 reviewed existing community reintegration programs, while Phase 4 used a Delphi technique with 10 experts to design and refine program components and strategies.

Results: The study revealed low levels of psychosocial and community reintegration, influenced by employment and housing factors. Content experts highlighted barriers such as inaccessible environments, transportation challenges, and negative societal attitudes. Program components included technological support, employment assistance, mentorship, and recreational activities. The first 3 phases informed a development of a 3-level model addressing client, community, and legislative domains. In the fourth phase, experts reached consensus on components and strategies to achieve this multi-level community reintegration model.

Conclusion: The evidence-based community reintegration model offers a structured, multi-level framework to address reintegration challenges in South Africa. It emphasizes coordinated interventions at individual, community, and policy levels to improve outcomes for individuals with traumatic spinal cord injuries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信