机器人辅助视频内窥镜腹股沟淋巴结切除术与Hugo™RAS系统:手术设置和初步经验。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Josep M Gaya, Camille Berquin, Giuseppe Basile, Alessio Pecoraro, Andrea Gallioli, Isabel Sanz Gomez, Paula Izquierdo, Angelo Territo, Pavel Gavrilov, Joan Palou, Antonio Rosales, Alberto Breda
{"title":"机器人辅助视频内窥镜腹股沟淋巴结切除术与Hugo™RAS系统:手术设置和初步经验。","authors":"Josep M Gaya, Camille Berquin, Giuseppe Basile, Alessio Pecoraro, Andrea Gallioli, Isabel Sanz Gomez, Paula Izquierdo, Angelo Territo, Pavel Gavrilov, Joan Palou, Antonio Rosales, Alberto Breda","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06044-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Hugo<sup>™</sup> RAS system is gaining prominence in the field of urologic robotic surgery. To date, no study has described robot-assisted video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (RAVEIL) using this system. Therefore, the aim of the study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the procedure, focusing on surgical set-up and preliminary results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of seven procedures in five patients with penile cancer were prospectively included. Baseline patient characteristics, intra- and post-operative surgical outcomes were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, four patients (80%) had negative clinical N-staging (cN0). Median (IQR) operative time was 90 (85-97.5) minutes, with a median (IQR) of 8 (8-9) lymph node yield per procedure. One post-operative complication, a lymphocele requiring percutaneous drainage (Clavien-Dindo 3a), was reported. Median (IQR) hospital stay was 3 (3-3.5) days and the median (IQR) time to drain removal was 8 (6.5-10) days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first case series demonstrating the safety and feasibility of RAVEIL using the Hugo<sup>™</sup> RAS system. The surgical configuration described may serve as a valuable reference standard for RAVEIL with this robotic platform and help novel adopters in implementing the platform in another surgical scenario.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"77 1","pages":"79-84"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robot-assisted video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy with the Hugo™ RAS System: surgical set-up and initial experience.\",\"authors\":\"Josep M Gaya, Camille Berquin, Giuseppe Basile, Alessio Pecoraro, Andrea Gallioli, Isabel Sanz Gomez, Paula Izquierdo, Angelo Territo, Pavel Gavrilov, Joan Palou, Antonio Rosales, Alberto Breda\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06044-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Hugo<sup>™</sup> RAS system is gaining prominence in the field of urologic robotic surgery. To date, no study has described robot-assisted video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (RAVEIL) using this system. Therefore, the aim of the study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the procedure, focusing on surgical set-up and preliminary results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of seven procedures in five patients with penile cancer were prospectively included. Baseline patient characteristics, intra- and post-operative surgical outcomes were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, four patients (80%) had negative clinical N-staging (cN0). Median (IQR) operative time was 90 (85-97.5) minutes, with a median (IQR) of 8 (8-9) lymph node yield per procedure. One post-operative complication, a lymphocele requiring percutaneous drainage (Clavien-Dindo 3a), was reported. Median (IQR) hospital stay was 3 (3-3.5) days and the median (IQR) time to drain removal was 8 (6.5-10) days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first case series demonstrating the safety and feasibility of RAVEIL using the Hugo<sup>™</sup> RAS system. The surgical configuration described may serve as a valuable reference standard for RAVEIL with this robotic platform and help novel adopters in implementing the platform in another surgical scenario.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva Urology and Nephrology\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"79-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva Urology and Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06044-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06044-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Hugo™RAS系统在泌尿外科机器人手术领域日益突出。迄今为止,还没有研究描述使用该系统的机器人辅助视频内窥镜腹股沟淋巴结切除术(RAVEIL)。因此,本研究的目的是评估手术的可行性和安全性,重点是手术设置和初步结果。方法:对5例阴茎癌患者共7例手术进行前瞻性分析。记录患者的基线特征、术中及术后手术结果。结果:总体而言,4例(80%)患者临床n分期(cN0)为阴性。中位(IQR)手术时间为90(85-97.5)分钟,每次手术中位(IQR)淋巴结清扫量为8(8-9)。报告了一例术后并发症,淋巴囊肿需要经皮引流(Clavien-Dindo 3a)。中位(IQR)住院时间为3(3-3.5)天,中位(IQR)引流时间为8(6.5-10)天。结论:这是第一个使用Hugo™RAS系统证明RAVEIL安全性和可行性的病例系列。所描述的手术配置可以作为RAVEIL与该机器人平台的有价值的参考标准,并帮助新的采用者在其他手术场景中实施该平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robot-assisted video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy with the Hugo™ RAS System: surgical set-up and initial experience.

Background: The Hugo RAS system is gaining prominence in the field of urologic robotic surgery. To date, no study has described robot-assisted video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (RAVEIL) using this system. Therefore, the aim of the study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the procedure, focusing on surgical set-up and preliminary results.

Methods: A total of seven procedures in five patients with penile cancer were prospectively included. Baseline patient characteristics, intra- and post-operative surgical outcomes were recorded.

Results: Overall, four patients (80%) had negative clinical N-staging (cN0). Median (IQR) operative time was 90 (85-97.5) minutes, with a median (IQR) of 8 (8-9) lymph node yield per procedure. One post-operative complication, a lymphocele requiring percutaneous drainage (Clavien-Dindo 3a), was reported. Median (IQR) hospital stay was 3 (3-3.5) days and the median (IQR) time to drain removal was 8 (6.5-10) days.

Conclusions: This is the first case series demonstrating the safety and feasibility of RAVEIL using the Hugo RAS system. The surgical configuration described may serve as a valuable reference standard for RAVEIL with this robotic platform and help novel adopters in implementing the platform in another surgical scenario.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Minerva Urology and Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
32.70%
发文量
237
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信