一项单中心观察性研究:在农村紧急情况中,通过附近医院为偏远地区紧急情况提供比单独的直升机紧急医疗服务更早的初级保健。

Katsutoshi Saito, Tomohiro Abe, Rina Tanohata, Takehiko Nagano, Hidenobu Ochiai
{"title":"一项单中心观察性研究:在农村紧急情况中,通过附近医院为偏远地区紧急情况提供比单独的直升机紧急医疗服务更早的初级保健。","authors":"Katsutoshi Saito, Tomohiro Abe, Rina Tanohata, Takehiko Nagano, Hidenobu Ochiai","doi":"10.2185/jrm.2024-038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Providing emergency care to serious patients in rural areas remains challenging. Intentional transit practice involves transporting a serious patient to a nearby hospital while requesting the Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS). This study aims to evaluate its effectiveness on earlier primary medical interventions and the decision of the destination hospital.</p><p><strong>Patient and methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center, retrospective observational study at a HEMS base hospital in a rural area of Japan. The study participants included patients who underwent the intentional transit practice between April 2012 and March 2019. We compared actual times to estimated times for each case treated with the HEMS alone (HEMS-alone model). Outcomes were the time from ambulance call to reaching the physician (physician reaching time), arrival at the final destination facility (destination hospital arrival time), and helicopter waiting time at the landing zone (helicopter waiting time). Subgroup analyses by region and an analysis of the relationship between diagnostic tests performed at the transit hospital and the type of destination facility were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-seven patients were eligible for analysis. Compared to the HEMS-alone model, the intentional transit practice reduced the physician reaching time (median [interquartile] min) (26 [21-32] vs. 37 [29-47], <i>P</i><0.0001) while increasing the destination hospital arrival time and the helicopter waiting time (71 [58-93] vs. 65 [59-80], <i>P</i>=0.03; 24 [18-34] vs. 19 [18-21], <i>P</i><0.0001; respectively). Subgroup analysis showed a consistent result for physician reaching time but heterogeneity in the other time courses by region. Diagnostic tests were related to transportation to facilities other than the HEMS base hospital.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intentional transit practice is beneficial for providing primary care earlier than the HEMS alone and for transport to more specific facilities. However, it delays arrival at the destination facility and increases helicopter waiting time.</p>","PeriodicalId":73939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rural medicine : JRM","volume":"20 2","pages":"92-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11962189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intentional transit practice through a nearby hospital for remote area emergencies provides earlier primary care than helicopter emergency medical services alone in rural emergencies: a single-center, observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Katsutoshi Saito, Tomohiro Abe, Rina Tanohata, Takehiko Nagano, Hidenobu Ochiai\",\"doi\":\"10.2185/jrm.2024-038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Providing emergency care to serious patients in rural areas remains challenging. Intentional transit practice involves transporting a serious patient to a nearby hospital while requesting the Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS). This study aims to evaluate its effectiveness on earlier primary medical interventions and the decision of the destination hospital.</p><p><strong>Patient and methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center, retrospective observational study at a HEMS base hospital in a rural area of Japan. The study participants included patients who underwent the intentional transit practice between April 2012 and March 2019. We compared actual times to estimated times for each case treated with the HEMS alone (HEMS-alone model). Outcomes were the time from ambulance call to reaching the physician (physician reaching time), arrival at the final destination facility (destination hospital arrival time), and helicopter waiting time at the landing zone (helicopter waiting time). Subgroup analyses by region and an analysis of the relationship between diagnostic tests performed at the transit hospital and the type of destination facility were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-seven patients were eligible for analysis. Compared to the HEMS-alone model, the intentional transit practice reduced the physician reaching time (median [interquartile] min) (26 [21-32] vs. 37 [29-47], <i>P</i><0.0001) while increasing the destination hospital arrival time and the helicopter waiting time (71 [58-93] vs. 65 [59-80], <i>P</i>=0.03; 24 [18-34] vs. 19 [18-21], <i>P</i><0.0001; respectively). Subgroup analysis showed a consistent result for physician reaching time but heterogeneity in the other time courses by region. Diagnostic tests were related to transportation to facilities other than the HEMS base hospital.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intentional transit practice is beneficial for providing primary care earlier than the HEMS alone and for transport to more specific facilities. However, it delays arrival at the destination facility and increases helicopter waiting time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of rural medicine : JRM\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"92-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11962189/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of rural medicine : JRM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2185/jrm.2024-038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rural medicine : JRM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2185/jrm.2024-038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在农村地区为重症患者提供急诊护理仍然具有挑战性。故意转运做法包括在请求直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)的同时,将重症患者运送到附近的医院。本研究旨在评估其对早期初级医疗干预和目的地医院决策的有效性。患者和方法:我们在日本农村地区的一家HEMS基地医院进行了一项单中心、回顾性观察研究。研究参与者包括在2012年4月至2019年3月期间接受有意转运实践的患者。我们比较了单独使用HEMS治疗的每个病例的实际时间和估计时间(HEMS单独模型)。结果包括从呼叫救护车到找到医生的时间(医生到达时间)、到达最终目的地设施的时间(目的地医院到达时间)和直升机在着陆区的等待时间(直升机等待时间)。按地区进行了亚组分析,并分析了在中转医院进行的诊断测试与目的地设施类型之间的关系。结果:87例患者符合分析条件。与单独的hems模型相比,有意中转实践减少了医生到达时间(中位数[四分位数]分钟)(26 [21-32]vs. 37 [29-47], PP=0.03;[18-34]与[18-21],结论:与单独的HEMS相比,有意转运的做法有利于更早地提供初级保健,并有利于运送到更具体的设施。然而,它延迟到达目的地设施和增加直升机等待时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intentional transit practice through a nearby hospital for remote area emergencies provides earlier primary care than helicopter emergency medical services alone in rural emergencies: a single-center, observational study.

Objective: Providing emergency care to serious patients in rural areas remains challenging. Intentional transit practice involves transporting a serious patient to a nearby hospital while requesting the Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS). This study aims to evaluate its effectiveness on earlier primary medical interventions and the decision of the destination hospital.

Patient and methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective observational study at a HEMS base hospital in a rural area of Japan. The study participants included patients who underwent the intentional transit practice between April 2012 and March 2019. We compared actual times to estimated times for each case treated with the HEMS alone (HEMS-alone model). Outcomes were the time from ambulance call to reaching the physician (physician reaching time), arrival at the final destination facility (destination hospital arrival time), and helicopter waiting time at the landing zone (helicopter waiting time). Subgroup analyses by region and an analysis of the relationship between diagnostic tests performed at the transit hospital and the type of destination facility were performed.

Results: Eighty-seven patients were eligible for analysis. Compared to the HEMS-alone model, the intentional transit practice reduced the physician reaching time (median [interquartile] min) (26 [21-32] vs. 37 [29-47], P<0.0001) while increasing the destination hospital arrival time and the helicopter waiting time (71 [58-93] vs. 65 [59-80], P=0.03; 24 [18-34] vs. 19 [18-21], P<0.0001; respectively). Subgroup analysis showed a consistent result for physician reaching time but heterogeneity in the other time courses by region. Diagnostic tests were related to transportation to facilities other than the HEMS base hospital.

Conclusion: The intentional transit practice is beneficial for providing primary care earlier than the HEMS alone and for transport to more specific facilities. However, it delays arrival at the destination facility and increases helicopter waiting time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信