中低收入国家社区卫生工作者的财务激励模式:范围界定审查。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Health Action Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1080/16549716.2025.2480412
Oumar Mallé Samb, Mariétou Niang, Emilie Gelinas, Ndeye Thiab Diouf, Titilayo Tatiana Agbadje, Abir El Haouly
{"title":"中低收入国家社区卫生工作者的财务激励模式:范围界定审查。","authors":"Oumar Mallé Samb, Mariétou Niang, Emilie Gelinas, Ndeye Thiab Diouf, Titilayo Tatiana Agbadje, Abir El Haouly","doi":"10.1080/16549716.2025.2480412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community health workers (CHWs) are key players in providing primary healthcare in low- and middle-income countries. However, their absence from the formal health system in many of these countries often presents a challenge to their remuneration. The objective of this scoping review is to document programs implemented at both small and large scales in low- and middle-income countries, the remuneration strategies they have established, and the effects of these strategies on the work of CHWs. In total, we included 50 articles in this review. We have identified four types of compensation: fixed compensation, performance-based compensation, compensation based on income-generating activities (IGAs), and combined compensation. We identified the strengths and weaknesses of each type of compensation. A common strength for most models was improvement in motivation and performance. A common weakness for most models was irregular payments. The results of this review highlight the need to consider the economic, social, and cultural settings of the countries or environments at hand, and to include CHWs in discussions regarding the selection of a compensation model.</p>","PeriodicalId":49197,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Action","volume":"18 1","pages":"2480412"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial motivation models for community health workers in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Oumar Mallé Samb, Mariétou Niang, Emilie Gelinas, Ndeye Thiab Diouf, Titilayo Tatiana Agbadje, Abir El Haouly\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16549716.2025.2480412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Community health workers (CHWs) are key players in providing primary healthcare in low- and middle-income countries. However, their absence from the formal health system in many of these countries often presents a challenge to their remuneration. The objective of this scoping review is to document programs implemented at both small and large scales in low- and middle-income countries, the remuneration strategies they have established, and the effects of these strategies on the work of CHWs. In total, we included 50 articles in this review. We have identified four types of compensation: fixed compensation, performance-based compensation, compensation based on income-generating activities (IGAs), and combined compensation. We identified the strengths and weaknesses of each type of compensation. A common strength for most models was improvement in motivation and performance. A common weakness for most models was irregular payments. The results of this review highlight the need to consider the economic, social, and cultural settings of the countries or environments at hand, and to include CHWs in discussions regarding the selection of a compensation model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Health Action\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"2480412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Health Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2025.2480412\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2025.2480412","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在低收入和中等收入国家,社区卫生工作者是提供初级卫生保健的关键角色。然而,在许多这些国家,她们不在正规卫生系统中,这往往对她们的薪酬构成挑战。本次范围审查的目的是记录在低收入和中等收入国家实施的小型和大型项目,他们制定的薪酬战略,以及这些战略对卫生工作者工作的影响。我们总共纳入了50篇文章。我们已经确定了四种类型的薪酬:固定薪酬、基于绩效的薪酬、基于创收活动(IGAs)的薪酬和组合薪酬。我们确定了每种补偿类型的优点和缺点。大多数模型的共同优点是动机和性能的改进。大多数模型的一个共同弱点是不定期付款。本综述的结果强调需要考虑国家或环境的经济、社会和文化背景,并在讨论选择补偿模式时将卫生工作者包括在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Financial motivation models for community health workers in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Community health workers (CHWs) are key players in providing primary healthcare in low- and middle-income countries. However, their absence from the formal health system in many of these countries often presents a challenge to their remuneration. The objective of this scoping review is to document programs implemented at both small and large scales in low- and middle-income countries, the remuneration strategies they have established, and the effects of these strategies on the work of CHWs. In total, we included 50 articles in this review. We have identified four types of compensation: fixed compensation, performance-based compensation, compensation based on income-generating activities (IGAs), and combined compensation. We identified the strengths and weaknesses of each type of compensation. A common strength for most models was improvement in motivation and performance. A common weakness for most models was irregular payments. The results of this review highlight the need to consider the economic, social, and cultural settings of the countries or environments at hand, and to include CHWs in discussions regarding the selection of a compensation model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Health Action
Global Health Action PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Action is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal affiliated with the Unit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine at Umeå University, Sweden. The Unit hosts the Umeå International School of Public Health and the Umeå Centre for Global Health Research. Vision: Our vision is to be a leading journal in the global health field, narrowing health information gaps and contributing to the implementation of policies and actions that lead to improved global health. Aim: The widening gap between the winners and losers of globalisation presents major public health challenges. To meet these challenges, it is crucial to generate new knowledge and evidence in the field and in settings where the evidence is lacking, as well as to bridge the gaps between existing knowledge and implementation of relevant findings. Thus, the aim of Global Health Action is to contribute to fuelling a more concrete, hands-on approach to addressing global health challenges. Manuscripts suggesting strategies for practical interventions and research implementations where none already exist are specifically welcomed. Further, the journal encourages articles from low- and middle-income countries, while also welcoming articles originated from South-South and South-North collaborations. All articles are expected to address a global agenda and include a strong implementation or policy component.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信