卫生系统主导的早期同意和直接联系高危亲属:试点研究结果。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Public Health Genomics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1159/000545404
Nora B Henrikson, Aaron Scrol, Jamilyn M Zepp, Melissa L Anderson, Paula R Blasi, John J Ewing, Jane Grafton, James D Ralston, Stephanie M Fullerton, Kathleen A Leppig
{"title":"卫生系统主导的早期同意和直接联系高危亲属:试点研究结果。","authors":"Nora B Henrikson, Aaron Scrol, Jamilyn M Zepp, Melissa L Anderson, Paula R Blasi, John J Ewing, Jane Grafton, James D Ralston, Stephanie M Fullerton, Kathleen A Leppig","doi":"10.1159/000545404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>At-risk relatives of probands with genetic variants associated with hereditary cancer risk should receive cascade genetic testing. In the USA, probands are expected to notify their own at-risk relatives, but many relatives never learn of their risk, representing missed opportunity to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with hereditary cancers. Direct contact of relatives could reach relatives not contacted by the proband. We conducted a single-arm, prospective pilot evaluation of a direct contact intervention based on patient and family preferences. Here, we report the study's quantitative results, measured by proband and relative participation in the intervention follow-up survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited adults receiving genetic counseling for inherited cancer risk at one US integrated health system. A genetic counselor offered to contact at-risk relatives. We surveyed probands and relatives at study enrollment and 6-8 weeks and evaluated administrative data to assess the program's outreach to probands and relatives, its acceptability, and its limited efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We approached 148 probands before their genetic counseling appointment. Fifty-five (37%) consented to study participation. Of these, 31 completed genetic testing, 29 of whom provided consent to contact 101 relatives. Forty-four percent (n = 45) of relatives consented to be contacted by the study genetic counselor. Acceptability was high for both groups and no harms were reported. All relatives reached (n = 43) received their proband's test results, including 6 pathogenic/likely pathogenic findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A direct contact program was acceptable, reached at-risk relatives, and communicated proband test results. Direct contact with early consent of relatives holds promise for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":49650,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Genomics","volume":" ","pages":"150-162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12074871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health System-Led Early Consent and Direct Contact of At-Risk Relatives: Pilot Study Results.\",\"authors\":\"Nora B Henrikson, Aaron Scrol, Jamilyn M Zepp, Melissa L Anderson, Paula R Blasi, John J Ewing, Jane Grafton, James D Ralston, Stephanie M Fullerton, Kathleen A Leppig\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000545404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>At-risk relatives of probands with genetic variants associated with hereditary cancer risk should receive cascade genetic testing. In the USA, probands are expected to notify their own at-risk relatives, but many relatives never learn of their risk, representing missed opportunity to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with hereditary cancers. Direct contact of relatives could reach relatives not contacted by the proband. We conducted a single-arm, prospective pilot evaluation of a direct contact intervention based on patient and family preferences. Here, we report the study's quantitative results, measured by proband and relative participation in the intervention follow-up survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited adults receiving genetic counseling for inherited cancer risk at one US integrated health system. A genetic counselor offered to contact at-risk relatives. We surveyed probands and relatives at study enrollment and 6-8 weeks and evaluated administrative data to assess the program's outreach to probands and relatives, its acceptability, and its limited efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We approached 148 probands before their genetic counseling appointment. Fifty-five (37%) consented to study participation. Of these, 31 completed genetic testing, 29 of whom provided consent to contact 101 relatives. Forty-four percent (n = 45) of relatives consented to be contacted by the study genetic counselor. Acceptability was high for both groups and no harms were reported. All relatives reached (n = 43) received their proband's test results, including 6 pathogenic/likely pathogenic findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A direct contact program was acceptable, reached at-risk relatives, and communicated proband test results. Direct contact with early consent of relatives holds promise for future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Genomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"150-162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12074871/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Genomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545404\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:先证者有遗传变异与遗传性癌症风险相关的高危亲属应接受级联基因检测。在美国,先证者应该通知他们自己有风险的亲属,但许多亲属从未了解他们的风险,这意味着错过了减少与遗传性癌症相关的发病率和死亡率的机会。亲属的直接联系可以到达未被先证者联系的亲属。我们进行了一项单臂前瞻性试点评估,根据患者和家属的偏好对直接接触干预进行评估。在这里,我们报告了研究的定量结果,通过先证者和相对参与干预随访调查来测量。方法:我们招募了在美国一个综合卫生系统接受遗传性癌症风险遗传咨询的成年人。一位遗传咨询师主动提出联系有风险的亲属。我们在研究入组时和6-8周时对先证者和亲属进行了调查,并评估了管理数据,以评估该计划对先证者和亲属的推广、可接受性和有限的有效性。结果:148名先证者在预约遗传咨询前进行了接触。55人(37%)同意参与研究。其中31人完成了基因检测,29人同意与101名亲属联系。44% (n=45)的亲属同意与研究遗传咨询师联系。两组的可接受性都很高,无危害报告。所有到达的亲属(n=43)都收到了先证者的检测结果,其中包括6项致病/可能致病的发现。结论:直接接触方案是可接受的,接触到有风险的亲属并传达先证者检测结果。直接接触早期同意的亲属为未来的研究带来了希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health System-Led Early Consent and Direct Contact of At-Risk Relatives: Pilot Study Results.

Introduction: At-risk relatives of probands with genetic variants associated with hereditary cancer risk should receive cascade genetic testing. In the USA, probands are expected to notify their own at-risk relatives, but many relatives never learn of their risk, representing missed opportunity to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with hereditary cancers. Direct contact of relatives could reach relatives not contacted by the proband. We conducted a single-arm, prospective pilot evaluation of a direct contact intervention based on patient and family preferences. Here, we report the study's quantitative results, measured by proband and relative participation in the intervention follow-up survey.

Methods: We recruited adults receiving genetic counseling for inherited cancer risk at one US integrated health system. A genetic counselor offered to contact at-risk relatives. We surveyed probands and relatives at study enrollment and 6-8 weeks and evaluated administrative data to assess the program's outreach to probands and relatives, its acceptability, and its limited efficacy.

Results: We approached 148 probands before their genetic counseling appointment. Fifty-five (37%) consented to study participation. Of these, 31 completed genetic testing, 29 of whom provided consent to contact 101 relatives. Forty-four percent (n = 45) of relatives consented to be contacted by the study genetic counselor. Acceptability was high for both groups and no harms were reported. All relatives reached (n = 43) received their proband's test results, including 6 pathogenic/likely pathogenic findings.

Conclusion: A direct contact program was acceptable, reached at-risk relatives, and communicated proband test results. Direct contact with early consent of relatives holds promise for future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Genomics
Public Health Genomics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Public Health Genomics'' is the leading international journal focusing on the timely translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies into public health, health policies, and healthcare as a whole. This peer-reviewed journal is a bimonthly forum featuring original papers, reviews, short communications, and policy statements. It is supplemented by topic-specific issues providing a comprehensive, holistic and ''all-inclusive'' picture of the chosen subject. Multidisciplinary in scope, it combines theoretical and empirical work from a range of disciplines, notably public health, molecular and medical sciences, the humanities and social sciences. In so doing, it also takes into account rapid scientific advances from fields such as systems biology, microbiomics, epigenomics or information and communication technologies as well as the hight potential of ''big data'' for public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信