放置宫内节育器时解痉药物的实际使用情况--大型观察性研究 EURAS-LCS12 的启示。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Lisa Eggebrecht, Manuel Rizzo, Moritz Klinghardt, Tanja Böhnke, Clare Barnett, Klaas Heinemann
{"title":"放置宫内节育器时解痉药物的实际使用情况--大型观察性研究 EURAS-LCS12 的启示。","authors":"Lisa Eggebrecht, Manuel Rizzo, Moritz Klinghardt, Tanja Böhnke, Clare Barnett, Klaas Heinemann","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2025.2480086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antispasmodic drugs are used to facilitate the insertion of intrauterine devices (IUD), and to decrease uterine cramping during the procedure. Evidence supporting these benefits is scarce, and little is known about the prevalence of antispasmodic use before IUD insertion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EURAS-LCS12 is an ongoing non-interventional cohort study in ten European countries. Information is gathered from health care professionals (HCP) and IUD users via questionnaires at the time of IUD insertion. Patterns of antispasmodics before IUD insertion, by participating country, were assessed using descriptive methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>96,024 users were included in the study, of which 2.7% (N = 2,565) received antispasmodics before IUD insertion, with notable differences observed between countries. Highest antispasmodic use was observed in France and Germany: in France, almost 50% of HCPs (68/144) gave antispasmodics at least once during the study period. In Germany, 16% of enrolling HCPs used antispasmodics at least once during the study period; two HCPs (0.8%) administered antispasmodics in 69% of all study participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical practices for prescribing and administering antispasmodics during IUD insertion vary by country and seem to rely on local recommendations, or locally applicable best practices. The heterogeneous use of antispasmodics with uncertain benefits highlights the need for evidence-based recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"149-152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world use of antispasmodic drugs during IUD insertion - insights from the large observational study EURAS-LCS12.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Eggebrecht, Manuel Rizzo, Moritz Klinghardt, Tanja Böhnke, Clare Barnett, Klaas Heinemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13625187.2025.2480086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antispasmodic drugs are used to facilitate the insertion of intrauterine devices (IUD), and to decrease uterine cramping during the procedure. Evidence supporting these benefits is scarce, and little is known about the prevalence of antispasmodic use before IUD insertion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EURAS-LCS12 is an ongoing non-interventional cohort study in ten European countries. Information is gathered from health care professionals (HCP) and IUD users via questionnaires at the time of IUD insertion. Patterns of antispasmodics before IUD insertion, by participating country, were assessed using descriptive methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>96,024 users were included in the study, of which 2.7% (N = 2,565) received antispasmodics before IUD insertion, with notable differences observed between countries. Highest antispasmodic use was observed in France and Germany: in France, almost 50% of HCPs (68/144) gave antispasmodics at least once during the study period. In Germany, 16% of enrolling HCPs used antispasmodics at least once during the study period; two HCPs (0.8%) administered antispasmodics in 69% of all study participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical practices for prescribing and administering antispasmodics during IUD insertion vary by country and seem to rely on local recommendations, or locally applicable best practices. The heterogeneous use of antispasmodics with uncertain benefits highlights the need for evidence-based recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"149-152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2025.2480086\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2025.2480086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:抗痉挛药物用于促进宫内节育器(IUD)的插入,并减少手术过程中的子宫痉挛。支持这些益处的证据很少,而且对宫内节育器植入前使用抗痉挛药物的流行情况知之甚少。方法:EURAS-LCS12是一项在10个欧洲国家进行的非干预性队列研究。信息收集来自卫生保健专业人员(HCP)和宫内节育器使用者在宫内节育器插入时通过问卷调查。使用描述性方法评估参与国在宫内节育器插入前的抗痉挛模式。结果:96,024名使用者被纳入研究,其中2.7% (N = 2,565)在植入宫内节育器前接受了抗痉挛药物治疗,国家间差异显著。法国和德国的抗痉挛药物使用率最高:在法国,几乎50%的hcp(68/144)在研究期间至少给予一次抗痉挛药物。在德国,16%的入组医护人员在研究期间至少使用过一次抗痉挛药物;两名HCPs(0.8%)在69%的研究参与者中使用抗痉挛药物。结论:不同国家在宫内节育器植入过程中处方和使用抗痉挛药物的临床实践不同,似乎依赖于当地的推荐或当地适用的最佳实践。抗痉挛药物的异质性使用和不确定的疗效突出了基于证据的建议的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world use of antispasmodic drugs during IUD insertion - insights from the large observational study EURAS-LCS12.

Introduction: Antispasmodic drugs are used to facilitate the insertion of intrauterine devices (IUD), and to decrease uterine cramping during the procedure. Evidence supporting these benefits is scarce, and little is known about the prevalence of antispasmodic use before IUD insertion.

Methods: EURAS-LCS12 is an ongoing non-interventional cohort study in ten European countries. Information is gathered from health care professionals (HCP) and IUD users via questionnaires at the time of IUD insertion. Patterns of antispasmodics before IUD insertion, by participating country, were assessed using descriptive methods.

Results: 96,024 users were included in the study, of which 2.7% (N = 2,565) received antispasmodics before IUD insertion, with notable differences observed between countries. Highest antispasmodic use was observed in France and Germany: in France, almost 50% of HCPs (68/144) gave antispasmodics at least once during the study period. In Germany, 16% of enrolling HCPs used antispasmodics at least once during the study period; two HCPs (0.8%) administered antispasmodics in 69% of all study participants.

Conclusion: Clinical practices for prescribing and administering antispasmodics during IUD insertion vary by country and seem to rely on local recommendations, or locally applicable best practices. The heterogeneous use of antispasmodics with uncertain benefits highlights the need for evidence-based recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health, The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care publishes original peer-reviewed research papers as well as review papers and other appropriate educational material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信