{"title":"临终决定和更严格地确定儿童最大利益的必要性。","authors":"James Cameron, Cameron Stewart, Julian Savulescu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This column discusses the New South Wales Supreme Court decision in H v OL [2024] NSWSC 271. That decision raises a number of issues about how the \"best interests\" principle is employed in cases where disputes arise about whether life-sustaining treatments should be withheld or withdrawn from children. The column argues that these cases would be better served by adopting the \"balance sheet\" approach that is employed in England and Wales.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"31 4","pages":"699-708"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"End-of-Life Decisions and the Need for Greater Rigour in the Determination of a Child's Best Interests.\",\"authors\":\"James Cameron, Cameron Stewart, Julian Savulescu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This column discusses the New South Wales Supreme Court decision in H v OL [2024] NSWSC 271. That decision raises a number of issues about how the \\\"best interests\\\" principle is employed in cases where disputes arise about whether life-sustaining treatments should be withheld or withdrawn from children. The column argues that these cases would be better served by adopting the \\\"balance sheet\\\" approach that is employed in England and Wales.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Law and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"699-708\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Law and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本专栏讨论新南威尔士州最高法院在H v OL [2024] NSWSC 271中的判决。这一决定引发了一系列关于“最大利益”原则如何在关于是否应该对儿童进行维持生命的治疗产生争议的情况下使用的问题。该专栏认为，如果采用英格兰和威尔士采用的“资产负债表”方法，这些案例将得到更好的解决。
End-of-Life Decisions and the Need for Greater Rigour in the Determination of a Child's Best Interests.
This column discusses the New South Wales Supreme Court decision in H v OL [2024] NSWSC 271. That decision raises a number of issues about how the "best interests" principle is employed in cases where disputes arise about whether life-sustaining treatments should be withheld or withdrawn from children. The column argues that these cases would be better served by adopting the "balance sheet" approach that is employed in England and Wales.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
